JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
New Information Behavior Model: Life Paradigm Based
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
New Information Behavior Model: Life Paradigm Based
Lee, Hyuk-Jin;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Humanities academia and scientific community have been fused together in 21st centurty and it creates new theories and models. Among them, the embodied cognition theory has received attention in several related fields. This study reviews the major metatheories in information user behavior with their limitations. Then, "Life paradigm information behavior model" is suggested as a new theory, which communsurates with new era`s request, introducing the embodied cognition theory and the entropy concept. By overcoming the limitations of individual approach to the information retrieval and user behaviors, we expect the discourse of the new integrated information retrieval paradigm.
 Keywords
Information Science Paradigm;Information Science Model;Information Behavior Model;Entropy;Embodied Information Theory;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
고인석. 1999. 인간의 정신성을 어떻게 이해할 것인가. "화이트헤드 연구", 2: 41-62. (Ko, In Sok. 1999. "How to Understand Human Mentality: A Whiteheadian Look at the Contemporary Mind - Body Debate." The Journal of Whitehead Studies, 2: 41-62.)

2.
박휴용. 2003. 교육의 리듬의 창조성에 관한 고찰. "화이트헤드 연구", 7: 107-138. (Park, Hyu Yong. 2003. "Consideration on creativity from the rhythm of education." The Journal of Whitehead Studies, 7: 107-138.)

3.
엔트로피를 읽는 사람들 엮음. 1999. "쉽게 읽는 엔트로피". 서울: 두레. (Research society of entropy. 1999. Easy to read entropy. Seoul: Dure press.)

4.
오영환. 1998. 화이트헤드의 인간의 시간경험. "西江人文論叢", 8: 171-181. (Oh, Young-Hwan. 1998. "Whitehead and the Human Experience of Time." Seogang Humanities journal, 8: 171-181.)

5.
이덕환. 1999. 열역학의 세계 - 엔트로피는 항상 증가하지 않는다. "과학동아", 159: 70-77. (Lee, Duk Hwan. 1999. "The world of thermodynamics- Entropy does not always increase." Science Dong-A, 159: 70-77.)

6.
장영준. 2001. "언어의 비밀". 서울: 한국문화사. (Jang, Youngjun. 2001. Secret of Language. Seoul: Hankookmunwha-sa.)

7.
전철. 1997. 화이트헤드의 인간이해: 현실적존재를 중심으로. "신학의 미래", 51-76. (Chun, Chul. 1997. "Whitehead's understanding of humaninty- focusing on actual entity." Future of theology, 51-76.)

8.
정찬섭. 1988. 감성과학의 심리학적 측면. "한국감성과학회지", 1(1): 20-21. (Chung, Chan Sup. 1988. "Psychological aspects of the science of sensibility." Korean Journal of the science of emotion & sensibility, 1(1): 20-21.)

9.
"한겨레 사이언스 온". 2010. 이정모. 테크놀로지 너희가 '마음, 몸, 이야기'를 아느냐?. 12월 23일. [online]. [cited 2015.9.23]. . (Hankyoreh Science-on. 2010. Technology, do you know 'mind, body, and story'? [online]. [cited 2015.9.23]. .)

10.
"한겨레 사이언스 온". 2012. 정보 사라질 땐 반드시 에너지 필요 - 실험 입증. 3월 13일. [online]. [cited 2015.9.21]. . (Hankyoreh Science-on. 2012. There needs energy when information disappears-experiment. [online]. [cited 2015.9.21]. .)

11.
21세기 기악회. 2007. 감성공학적 연구방법을 통한 음악적 감성연구의 연구의 가능성. [online]. [cited 2015.10.21]. . (The Korean Society of the 21st Century Music. 2007. Possibility of musical sensibility study through Sensibility Ergonomics methodology [online]. [cited 2015.10.21]. .)

12.
Antoine Bérut et al. 2012. "Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics." Nature, 483: 187-189. crossref(new window)

13.
Case, D. O. 2005. Theories of Information Behavio (ASIST monograph). Fisher K. E., S. Frdelez, and L. McKechnie (eds.) (pp. 289-293). Information Today, Inc: Medford, NJ.

14.
Dervin, B. 1999. "On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method." Information Professing and Management, 35(6): 727-750. crossref(new window)

15.
Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage

16.
Escaprit, Robert. 1995. "정보와 커뮤니케이션". 김광현 옮김. 서울: 민음사.

17.
Fisher, E. P. 2009. "슈뢰딩거의 고양이". 박규호 옮김. 파주: 들녁.

18.
Gergen, K. J. 1999. An Invitation to Social Construction. London: Sage.

19.
Kuhlthau, C. C. 1991. "Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5): 361-371. crossref(new window)

20.
Leslie, P. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.). 이영근 옮김. 2005 (원서: 1995). "교육과 구성주의: 교육공학의 인식론적 기반". 서울: 학지사.

21.
Ma, L. 2012. "Meanings of information: The assumptions and research consequences of three foundational LIS theories." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 63(4): 716-723. crossref(new window)

22.
Nahl, D. 2005. Theories of Information Behavio (ASIST monograph). Fisher K. E., S. Frdelez, and L. McKechnie (eds.) (pp. 39-44). Information Today, Inc: Medford, NJ.

23.
Sampson, E. E. 1993. Celebrating the Other: A Dialogic Account of Human Nature. CO, Boulder: Westview Press.

24.
Shoichi Toyabe et al. 2010. "Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality." Nature Physics, 6: 988-992. crossref(new window)

25.
Talja, S., K. Tuominen, and R. Savolainen. 2005. ""Isms" in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism." Journal of Documentation, 61(1): 79-101. crossref(new window)

26.
Whitehead, A. N. 김용옥 옮김. 1998 (원서: 1929). "이성의 기능". 서울: 통나무.