Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Performance comparison of refrigeration cycle using R134a with the vapor-liquid ejector
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Performance comparison of refrigeration cycle using R134a with the vapor-liquid ejector
Yoon, Jung-In; Kim, Chung-Lae; Son, Chang-Hyo;
  PDF(new window)
Recently, research on high-efficiency refrigeration cycles that apply an ejector to basic cycles has progressed actively. The role of the ejector and the performance of refrigeration cycles are subordinate to ejector locations. In this study, the performance of three refrigeration cycles with different ejector locations is compared and analyzed. The results showed an increased COP in all cycles due to the application of the ejector, with the highest increase of 44% compared to a basic refrigeration cycle. The ejector refrigeration cycle proposed in this study presents the highest COP, 3.47. Moreover, the decrease in condensation capacity in Bergander's cycle, Xing's cycle, and our proposed ejector refrigeration cycle went up to 21%. In refrigeration cycles applying the ejector, the pressure ratio of the ejector, the vapor fraction of discharge, and compression ratio are important factors for COP enhancement. For this reason, detailed and accurate control of these is significant.
Vapor-liquid ejector;R134a;Ejector refrigeration cycle;Coefficient of performance;
 Cited by
J. Chen, S. Jarall, H. Havtun, and B. Palm, "A review on versatile ejector applications in refrigeration systems", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 67-90, 2015. crossref(new window)

M. Xing, G. Yan, and J. Yu, "Performance evaluation of an ejector subcooled vapor-compression refrigeration cycle", Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 92, pp 431-436, 2015. crossref(new window)

K. Sumeru, S. Sulaimon, H. Nasution, and F. N. Ani, "Numerical and experimental study of an ejector as an expansion device in split-type air conditioner for energy savings", Energy and Buildings, vol. 79, pp. 98-105, 2014. crossref(new window)

N. Lawrence and S. Elbel, "Theoretical and practical comparison of two-phase ejector refrigeration cycles including First and Second Law analysis", International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1220-1232, 2013. crossref(new window)

Aspen HYSYS, Version 8.0, Aspen Technology Inc, 2013.

J. I. Yoon, C. H. Son, K. H. Choi, C. M. Son, S. H. Seol, H. S. Lee, and H. J. Kim, "Improvement of efficiency of kalina cycle and performance comparison", Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 11-19, 2015.

J. I. Yoon, C. H. Son, S. H. Seol, H. U. Kim, S. J. Ha, S. H. Jung, H. J. Kim, and H. S. Lee, "Performance analysis of OTEC power cycle with a liquid vapor ejector using R32/R152a", Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1597-1605, 2015. crossref(new window)

H. S. Lee, J. I. Yoon, C. H. Son, S. J. Ha, S. H. Seol, B. H. Ye, H. J. Kim, and G. J. Jung, "Efficiency enhancement of the ocean thermal energy conversion system with a vapor-vapor ejector", Advances In Mechanical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1-10, 2015.