JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Transducer Combination for High-Quality Ultrasound Tomography Based on Speed of Sound Imaging
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Transducer Combination for High-Quality Ultrasound Tomography Based on Speed of Sound Imaging
Kim, Young Hun; Park, Kwan Kyu;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The type of ultrasound transducer used influences the quality of a reconstructed ultrasound image. This study analyzed the effect of transducer type on ultrasound computed tomography (UCT) image quality. The UCT was modeled in an ultrasound simulator by using a 5 cm anatomy model and a ring-shape 5 MHz 128 transducer array, which considered attenuation, refraction, and reflection. Speed-of-sound images were reconstructed by the Radon transform as the UCT image modality. Acoustic impedance images were also reconstructed by the delay-and-sum (DAS) method, which considered the speed of sound information. To determine the optimal combination of transducers in observation, point-source, flat, and focused transducers were tested in combination as trasmitters and receivers; UCT images were constructed from each combination. The combination of point-source/flat transducer as transmitting and receiving devices presented the best reconstructed image quality. In UCT implementation, the combination of a flat transducer for transmitting and a point transducer for receiving permitted acceptable image quality.
 Keywords
Ultrasound;Computed Tomography (CT);Radon Transform;Delay and Sum;Transducer;Time of Flight;Simulation;Acoustics;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
G. H. Glover and J. C. Sharp, "Reconstruction of ultrasound propagation speed distributions in soft tissue: time-of-flight tomography," IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, Vol. SU-24, No. 4 (1977)

2.
J. Nebeker and T. R. Nelson, "Breast sound speed tomography from B-mode data," IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, pp. 2344-2347 (2010)

3.
I. Peterlik, R. Jirik, N. Ruiter and J. Jan, "Regularized image reconstruction for ultrasound attenuation transmission tomography," Radioengineering, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 125-132 (2008)

4.
H. I. Schlaberg, M. Yang and B. S. Hoyle, "Ultrasound reflection tomography for industrial processes," Ultrasonics International, Vol. 36, Issues 1-5, pp. 297-303 (1998) crossref(new window)

5.
F. Huang, A. Maurudis, J. Gamelin, A. Aguirre, D. Castillo, P. Guo1 and Q. Zhu, "A fast photoacoustic imaging system based on a curved ultrasound transducer array," Bioengineering Conference, IEEE 33rd Annual Northeast, pp. 47-48 (2007)

6.
C. Li, N. Duric, P. Littrup and L. Huang, "In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography," Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., Vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 1615-1628 (2009) crossref(new window)

7.
A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, "Principles of computerized tomographic imaging," The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, pp. 49-112 (1988)

8.
J.-F. Synnevag, "Adaptive beamforming for medical ultrasound imaging," Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo Nr. 835, pp. 4-18 (2008)

9.
Z. Sharif-Khodaei and M. H. Aliabadi, "Assessment of delay-and-sum algorithms for damage detection in aluminium and composite plates," Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 23, No. 7, 075007 (2014) crossref(new window)

10.
B. E. Treeby and B. T. Cox, "k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave-fields," J. Biomed. Opt., Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 021314 (2010) crossref(new window)

11.
B. E. Treeby, J. Jaros, A. P. Rendell and B. T. Cox, "Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 131, No. 6, pp. 4324-4336 (2012) crossref(new window)

12.
L. A. Shepp and B. F. Logan, "The Fourier reconstruction of a head section," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. NS-21 (1974)