JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Low-dose Protocol in Chest CT: Comparison of Standard-dose Protocol
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Low-dose Protocol in Chest CT: Comparison of Standard-dose Protocol
Lee, Won-Jeong; Ahn, Bong-Seon; Park, Young-Sun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare radiation dose and image quality between low-dose (LDP) and standard-dose protocol (SDP). LDP (120 kVp, 30 mAs, 2-mm thickness) and SDP (120 kVp, 180 mAs, 1.2-mm thickness) images obtained from 61 subjects were retrospectively evaluated at level of carina bifurcation, using multi-detector CT (Brilliance 16, Philips Medical Systems). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated at ascending aorta and infraspinatus muscle, from CT number and back-ground noise. Radiation dose from two protocols measured at 5-point using acrylic-phantom, and CT number and noise measured at 4-point using water-phantom. All statistical analysis were performed using SPSS 19.0 program. LDP images showed significantly more noise and a significantly lower SNR and CNR than did SDP images at ascending aorta and infraspinatus muscle. Noise, SNR and CNR were significantly correlated with body mass index (p<0.001). Radiation dose, SNR and CNR from phantom were significant differences between two protocols. LDP showed a significant reduction of radiation dose with a significant change in SNR and CNR compared with SDP. Therefore, exposure dose on LDP in clinical applications needs resetting highly more considering image quality.
 Keywords
Chest low-dose;Contrast-to-noise ratio;Image quality;Radiation dose;Signal-to-noise ratio;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
Liver CT 검사에서 프로토콜 변화에 따른 선량 감소와 영상의 질 개선에 관한 연구,조유진;조평곤;

대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학, 2015. vol.38. 2, pp.107-114 crossref(new window)
1.
Development and Characterization of a Dosimeter Using Tissue-Equivalent Scintillator by Photon-Counting Method, Journal of Sensor Science and Technology, 2014, 23, 1, 29  crossref(new windwow)
2.
A Study of The Correlation of The Area Dose with Residual CT Contrast Media and MRI Contrast Media during The Use of General Imaging Automatic Exposure Control System, Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2016, 10, 8, 619  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
건강보험심사평가원. CT촬영비용 및 장비설치현황. http://stat.kosis.kr/nsieu/index.jsp?hOrg=354.

2.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRPPublication 87. Oxford; Pegamon Press. 2000.

3.
Rydberg J, Buckwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, Phillips MD, Conces DJ Jr, Aisen AM, Persohn SA, Kopecky KK. Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2000;20(6):1787-1806. crossref(new window)

4.
Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Stratakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N. The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. Med. Phys. 2005;32(6):1621-1629. crossref(new window)

5.
McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler(Jr) JM. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: Overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006;26(2):503-512. crossref(new window)

6.
Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Nicolas V. Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: Prospective raddomized study. Radiology. 2007;245(2):577-583. crossref(new window)

7.
Goo HW. CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean. J. Radiol. 2012;13(1):1-11. crossref(new window)

8.
Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, Arams RS, McCauley DI. Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology. 1990:175(3):729-731. crossref(new window)

9.
Johkoh T, Honda O, Yamamoto S, Tomiyama N, Koyama M, Kozuka T, Mihara N, Hamada S, Narumi Y, Nakamura H, Kudo M. Evaluation of image quality and spatial resolution of low-dose high-pitch multidetector-row helical high-resolution CT in 11 autopsy lungs and a wire phantom. Radiat. Med. 2001;19(6):279-284.

10.
Fasola G, Belvedere O, Aita M, Zanin T, Follador A, Cassetti P, Meduri S, De Pangher V, Pignata G, Rosolen V, Barbone F, Grossi F. Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma in an asbestos-exposed population: baseline results of a prospective, nonrandomized feasibility trial--an Alpe-adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary Group Study (ATOM 002). Oncologist. 2007;12(10):1215-1224. crossref(new window)

11.
Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Betschart T, Desbiolles L, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Alkadhi H. Radiation dose values for various coronary calcium scoring protocols in dual-source CT. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2009;25(4):443-451. crossref(new window)

12.
Prakash P, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, Shepard JAO, Digumarthy SR. Is weight-based adjustment of automatic exposure control necessary for the reduction of chest CT radiation dose? Korean. J. Radiol. 2010;11(1):46-53. crossref(new window)

13.
Kubo T, Lin PJ, Stiller W, Takahashi M, Kauczor HU, Ohno Y, Hatabu H. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;190(2):335-343. crossref(new window)

14.
Itoh S, Ikeda M, Arahata S Kodaira T, Isomura T, Kato T, Yamakawa K, Maruyama K, Ishigaki T. Lung cancer screening: minimum tube current required for helical CT. Radiology. 2000;215(1): 175-183. crossref(new window)

15.
한국의료영상품질관리원. 전산화단층촬영장치 품질관리 검사. http://www.ikiami.or.kr/info/KMI417QD.aspx

16.
Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 2008;248(3):995-1003. crossref(new window)

17.
Qi W, Li J, Du X. Method for automatic tube current selection for obtaining a consistent image quality and dose optimization in a cardiac multidetector CT. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10(6):568-574. crossref(new window)

18.
Park EA, Lee W, Kang JH, Yin YH, Chung JW, Park JH. The Image Quality and Radiation Dose of 100-kVp versus 120-kVp ECG-Gated 16-Slice CT Coronary Angiography. Korean. J. Radiol. 2009;10(3): 235-243. crossref(new window)

19.
Takahashi M, Maguire WM, Ashtari M, Khan A, Papp Z, Alberico R, Campbell W, Eacobacci T, Herman PG. Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax comparison with the standard-dose technique. Invest. Radiol. 1998; 33(2):68-73. crossref(new window)

20.
Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, McLoud T, Rhea J. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179(2):461-465. crossref(new window)