JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Different Perceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Elementary, Middle, and High School Students regarding Irradiated Food, Nuclear Power Generation, and Medical Radiation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Different Perceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Elementary, Middle, and High School Students regarding Irradiated Food, Nuclear Power Generation, and Medical Radiation
Han, Eun Ok; Kim, Jae Rok; Choi, Yoon Seok;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A survey was conducted on perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes of elementary, middle, and high school students, who will lead public opinion in the future, regarding irradiated food, nuclear power generation, and medical radiation. These topics urgently require general social acceptability among various fields in which radiation is used. Educational methods to enhance social acceptability were partially discovered. First, it is necessary to implement different strategies when designing courses for female and male students. Male students have higher levels of objective knowledge (p<0.039) of irradiated food, necessity (p<0.001) and objective knowledge (p<0.001) of nuclear power generation, approval of building a nuclear power plant in the nation (p<0.001), necessity (p<0.001) and objective knowledge (p<0.001) of medical radiation, and attitudes regarding using medical radiation (p<0.007, p<0.001). Second, the educational effect of explanations to help increase national understanding of the necessity and safety of nuclear power generation will increase if information on the necessity and safety of medical radiation is provided as well. Both male and female students perceived that medical radiation is the most necessary (p<0.001), medical radiation is the safest (p<0.001), and nuclear power generation is the least safe (p<0.013). Moreover, the correlation between medical radiation and nuclear power generation was the highest. Third, there is a need for different lectures between classes, since the patterns of perception vary according to the field of radiation use among elementary, middle, and high school students. Elementary school students had high interest in education on nuclear power generation (p<0.005), perceived that irradiated food is safe (p<0.001), and had the most positive attitude toward consuming irradiated food (p<0.001). Middle school students had high interest in education on nuclear power generation (p<0.018), perceived that nuclear power generation (p<0.001) and medical radiation (p<0.002) are safe, and had the most positive attitude toward using radiation for treatment (p<0.001). High school students had the highest level of objective knowledge on nuclear power generation (p<0.001) and medical radiation (p<0.001), and perceived that medical radiation is the most necessary (p<0.017); however, they perceived that nuclear power generation is the least safe (p<0.001). Attitudes toward irradiated food intake (p<0.001) and approving construction of a nuclear power plant in their neighborhood (p<0.001) were both low. Fourth, it is necessary to provide educational programs to change perceptions and improve attitudes rather than providing education focused on objective knowledge. There was no correlation between objective knowledge and necessity of irradiated food, objective knowledge and safety and interest in education on nuclear power generation, and objective knowledge and interest in education and information acquirement regarding medical radiation. In particular, high school students had the highest level of objective knowledge and yet had the least positive attitudes toward approving construction of nuclear power plants in their neighborhood and intake of irradiated food. Therefore, to increase the social acceptability of using nuclear energy and radiation in Korea, it is desirable to provide strategic educational programs to improve perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes regarding the necessity and safety of their use.
 Keywords
Irradiated food;Nuclear power generation;Medical radiation;Perceptions;Knowledge;Attitudes;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
고등학생들의 원자력 인식구조에 대한 언어 연결망 분석,김봉철;정운관;최명일;

한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 2015. vol.15. 7, pp.578-590 crossref(new window)
2.
방사선학과 학생들의 공간선량 측정 경험이 방사선 안전 인식에 미치는 영향,문재미;박상태;유지현;

Journal of Radiation Protection and Research, 2015. vol.40. 3, pp.174-180 crossref(new window)
1.
The Radiation Problem and Its Solution from a Health Communication Perspective, Journal of Korean Medical Science, 2016, 31, Suppl 1, S88  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Semantic Network Analysis on Teen's Perceptual Construct about Nuclear Power, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 2015, 15, 7, 578  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Analysis of food irradiation education for elementary, middle, and high school students for three years in South Korea, Nutrition Research and Practice, 2016, 10, 2, 237  crossref(new windwow)
4.
Radiological Safety Perception Change after Spatial Dose Measurement of Radiology Department Students, Journal of Radiation Protection and Research, 2015, 40, 3, 174  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
김대근, 전현욱. 후기현대사회의 위험관리를 위한 형법 및 형사정책연구(I): 선진 과학기술사회의 위험관리 형사정책. 경제.인문사회연구회 협동연구 총서; 한국형사정책연구원. 2012.

2.
Roberts DA. Scientific literacy. In Abell SK. Lederman NG(Eds.); Handbook of Research on Science Education. 2007;729-780.

3.
Zeidler DL, Sadler TD, Simmons ML, Howes EV. Beyond STS: A Research-based, Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education. Science Education. 2005;89:357-377. crossref(new window)

4.
Sadler TD. Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of the Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2004;41:513-536. crossref(new window)

5.
Honkanen P, Verplanken B. Understanding Attitudes towards Genetically Modified Food: The Role of Values and Attitude Strength. Journal of Consumer Policy. 2004;27:401-420. crossref(new window)

6.
Bem D. The Concept of Risk in the Study of Human Behavior. In J. Dowie, P. Lefrere II, (Eds.), Risk and Chance, Milton Keynes, England, The Open University Press. 1980;1-15.

7.
이재신. 미디어 형식과 위험 메시지 구성이 감정적 위험인식과 행위의도에 미치는 영향. 인지과학. 2012;23(4):457-485.

8.
Slovic P. Perception of Risk from Radiation, London; Earthscan Publication Ltd. 2000:264-274.

9.
조성경, 오세기. 원자력시설 및 정책의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 인식인자 도출에 관한 이론적 고찰. 한국에너지공학회지. 2002;11(4):332-341.

10.
Slovic P. Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy. Risk Analysis. 1993;13(6):675-682. crossref(new window)

11.
박균성. 원자력 안전법제의 재검토. 행정법이론실무학회 행정법연구. 2012;33:169-190.

12.
Bird DK, Haynes K, Honert RVD, McAneney J, Poortinga W. Nuclear Power in Australia: A Comparative Analysis of Public Opinion Regarding Climate Change and the Fukushima Disaster. Energy Policy (In Press).

13.
Prati G, Zani B. The Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Risk Perception, Antinuclear Behavioral Intentions, Attitude, Trust, Environmental Beliefs, and Values. Environment and Behavior. 2012;45:782-798.

14.
Siegrist M, Visschers VHM. Acceptance of Nuclear Power: The Fukushima Effect. Energy Policy. 2012;59:112-119.

15.
Yamamura E. Experience of Technological and Natural Disaster and their Impact on the Perceived Risk of Nuclear Accidents After the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan 2011: A Cross-country Analysis. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2012;41:360-363.

16.
김효정, 김미라. 방사선조사 식품에 대한 소비자의 태도. 대한가정학회지. 2003;41(5):119-130.

17.
John W, Malone J. Consumer willingness to purchase and to pay more for potential benefits of irradiated fresh food products. Agribusiness 1990;6(2):163-178. crossref(new window)

18.
Foster A. The Impact of Consumer Acceptance on Trade in Irradiated Foods. Journal of British Food. 1990;92(5):28-34.

19.
조경영, 문주현. 원자력시설 주변 지역주민의 원자력에 대한 인식조사. 대한방사성폐기물학회. 2011;9(3):181-189.

20.
조선대학교. 방사선조사 의료용품에 대한 국민이해도 제고 방안 연구. 과학기술부. 2005.

21.
김태호. 원자력발전의 안전성 담보 시스템에 대한 법적 검토: 발전용 원자로에 대한 리스크 관리를 중심으로. 행정법이론실무학회 행정법 연구. 2011;30:39-65.

22.
고려대학교. 원자력 안전문화 프로그램의 효과성 향상 방안. 한국원자력연구소. 2006.

23.
김민훈. 원자력 안전규제에 대한 법제 고찰. 부산대학교 법학연구. 2012;53(2):53-77.

24.
Hodson D. Time for Action: Science Education for an Alternative Future. International Journal of Science Education. 2003;25(6):645-670. crossref(new window)

25.
Roth WM. Activism or Science, Technology Education as Byproduct of Capacity Building. Journal for Activism in Science & Technology Education. 2009;1(1):16-31.

26.
장지영, 문지영, 유효숙, 최경희, Joseph Krajcik. 과학과 관련된 사회, 윤리적 문제(SSI)의 맥락에 따른 중학생들의 인성적 태도와 가치관 분석. 한국과학교육학회지. 2012;32(7):1124-1138.

27.
유승엽. 원자력발전에 대한 국민 신뢰감 회복 PR 정책방향. 디지털정책관리학회. 2013;11(10):287-294.

28.
Slovic P. Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics and Science: Surveying the Risk Assessment Battlefield. London: Earthscan Publication Ltd. 2000;390-412.

29.
Showers DE, Shrigley RL, Lobert L. Effect of Knowledge and Persuasion on High School Students' Attitudes toward Nuclear Power Plant. J. Research in Science Teaching. 1995;32:29-43. crossref(new window)

30.
Krimsky S. The Role of Theory in Risk Studies. Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, New York. 1992:3-23.

31.
Slovic P. Perception of Risk: Reflection on the Psychometric Paradigm. In D. Golding & S. Krimsky(Eds.) Theory of Risk. 1992;117-152.

32.
Slovic P. Perception of Risk. Science, 1987;236:280-285. crossref(new window)

33.
Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein D, Read D, Combs B. How Safe is Safe enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits. Policy Sciences. 1978;9(2):127-152. crossref(new window)

34.
김재윤. 원자력과 방사성물질등의 위험에 대한 형법적 보호. 법학연구. 2012;45:289.

35.
Peter E, Slovic P. The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1996;26:1427-1453. crossref(new window)