JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Development of Stereotest using Gabor Images in 3D Environment: An Explorative Study
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Journal of Broadcast Engineering
  • Volume 20, Issue 6,  2015, pp.901-911
  • Publisher : The Korean Institute of Broadcast and Media Engineers
  • DOI : 10.5909/JBE.2015.20.6.901
 Title & Authors
The Development of Stereotest using Gabor Images in 3D Environment: An Explorative Study
Kham, Keetaek;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Many studies tried to develop a 3D display based stereo test as a substitute for the conventional stereo test. Although many 3D monitor based stereo tests have various advantages over the conventional stereo tests with printed stimuli, they have a crucial limitation in manipulating disparity. The least value for disparity manipulation is one pixel, which is too big to screen the normal stereo acuity in pc environment with a short viewing distance. In this explorative study, a Gabor image was employed as a test stimulus, because its position can be manipulated by changing its phase information, which allows sub-pixel manipulation for disparity. Instead of employing the methods of the conventional stereo tests where measurement was made only once for each of a wide range of disparity values, 10 replications were administrated for each of 6 disparity levels. The results from the test using Gabor images were compared with those using random dot stimulus because the latter stimulus was exactly the same as that of the conventional stereo test. The correlation coefficient between two tests was found to be moderate. After one month later, the whole test was repeated in the same settings. The correlation coefficient between test and retest results from Gabor images was found to be as high as that from a random dot stimulus, implying high test-retest reliability. These results suggest that a Gabor stimulus could be used as a test stimulus for the valid and reliable stereo test, even in the limited condition, such as 3D environment with a short viewing distance and a condition for evaluating the stereo acuity very precisely.
 Keywords
Stereotest;3D environment;a Gabor image;random dot stereogram;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Howard, I. P. Seeing in depth. Vol. 1 Basic mechanisms. Thornhill, Ontario, Canada: I Porteous, 2002.

2.
van Beurden, M. H. P. H., IJsselsteijn, W. A., & de Kort, Y. A. W. Effectiveness of stereoscopic displays in medicine : a review. 3D Research, vol 3 no 1, pp. 1-13, 2012. crossref(new window)

3.
Gargantini, A., Facoetti, G., Vitali, A. A random dot stereoacuity test based on 3d technology. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Pervasive Health, pp. 358–361, 2014.

4.
Kim, J., Yang, H.K., Kim, Y., Lee, B., & Hwang, J. M. Distance stereotest using a 3-dimensional monitor for adult subjects, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 151 no. 6, pp. 1081–1086, 2011. crossref(new window)

5.
Breyer, A. Jiang, X., Rutsche, A., & Mojon, D. S. A New 3D Monitor –Based Random-Dot Stereotest for Children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47, pp. 4842-4846, 2006. crossref(new window)

6.
Fujikado T, Hosohata J, Ohmi G, et al. Use of dynamic and colored stereogram to measure stereopsis in strabismic patients. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 42, pp. 101-107, 1998. crossref(new window)

7.
Tychsen L. Binocular vision. In (Hart W. M. Eds). Adler’s Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Applications, pp. 773–853. CV Mosby St. Louis, 1992.

8.
Cho, Y. A., Cho, S., & Roh, G. Evaluation of criteria of stereoacuity for Titmus, Randot & TNO Stereotest. Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society, Vol.40 No.2, pp. 532-537, 1999.

9.
Ardito M. Studies of the influence of display size and picture brightness on the preferred viewing distance for HDTV programs. SMPTE Journal, 103, pp.517–522, 1994. crossref(new window)

10.
Withers, S. (Oct 3, 2014). TV Viewing Distance Guide. Retrieved from https://www.avforums.com/article/tv-full-hd-ultra-hd-4k-viewing-distance-guide.10704.

11.
Rempel D. Willms K. Anshel J. Jaschinski W. Sheedy J. The effects of visual display distance on eye accommodation, head posture, and vision and neck symptoms. Human Factors, vol. 49, pp. 830–838, 2007. crossref(new window)

12.
Watson, A. B., Barlow, H. B., & Robson, J. G. What does the eye see best?. Nature, vol. 302 no. 5907, pp. 419-22, 1983. crossref(new window)

13.
Tsui, S., Khuu, S. K., & Hayes, A. The perceived position shift of a pattern that contains internal motion is accompanied by a change in the pattern’s apparent size and shape. Vision Research, 47, pp. 402-410, 2007. crossref(new window)

14.
Ohzawa, G.C. DeAngelis, R. Freeman, R. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science, vol. 249, pp. 1037–1041, 1990. crossref(new window)

15.
Anzai, A., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D. Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: Position vs. phase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 94, pp. 5438–5443, 1997. crossref(new window)

16.
Petrov, Y. & Glennerster, A. The role of a local reference in stereoscopic detection of depth relief. Vision Research, vol. 44, pp. 367-376, 2004. crossref(new window)

17.
Glennerster, A., & McKee, S. P. Bias and sensitivity of stereo judgements in the presence of a slanted reference plane. Vision Research, vol. 39, pp. 3057–3069, 1999. crossref(new window)

18.
Richards, W. Stereopsis and Stereoblindness. Experimental Brain Research, vol. 10, pp. 380-388, 1970. crossref(new window)

19.
Ogle, K. N. Note on stereoscopic acuity and viewing distance. Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol.148, pp. 794–798, 1958. crossref(new window)

20.
Brown, J. P., Ogle, K.N. & Reiher, L. Stereoscopic acuity and observation distance. Investigative Ophthalmology, vol. 4, pp. 894–-900, 1965.