JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Differences in Preference Depending on Signal Explicitness when Selecting Fashion Luxury Brand - The Moderating Effects of Self-Construal and Implicit Theory -
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Differences in Preference Depending on Signal Explicitness when Selecting Fashion Luxury Brand - The Moderating Effects of Self-Construal and Implicit Theory -
Suh, Min-Jeong; Hwang, Sun-Jin; Yeo, Jun-Sang;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
There are differences in preference according to the brand signal explicitness when selecting fashion luxury brand, and the purpose of this study is to verify the moderating effects of self-construal and implicit theory in relation to those preferences. This study divided the experiment design into two mixed design studies: Study 1 and Study 2. The study 1 was composed of the following factors: brand signal explicitness(subtle vs. explicit signal) and self-construal(independent vs. interdependent self-construal). Study 2 was composed of the following factors: brand signal explicitness( subtle vs. explicit signal) and Implicit theory(entity vs. incremental theorist). Convenience sampling was conducted to find the subjects of study 1 and study 2. Study 1 analyzed data from 172 women in Seoul, Gyeonggi-do and Busan who prefer luxury brand, and study 2 used data from 138 women. The results of this study are as follows. 1) Independent self-construal primed group was shown to prefer subtle signal product to explicit signal product, whereas interdependent self-construal priming group preferred explicit signal product to subtle signal product. 2) The entity theorist to prefer explicit signal product to subtle signal product. On the other hand, the incremental theorist did not show significant difference in the preference between subtle and explicit signal products. Therefore, the results of the present study shown the importance of understanding consumers through the difference depending on consumer inclination and psychology, recommending preferred luxury brand according to the inclination of the target customers, and establishing segmented marketing strategy to captivate consumers with these various characteristics.
 Keywords
brand signal explicitness;implicit theory;product preference;luxury brand;self-construal;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Aaker, J. L. & Patti, W. (1998). Empathy versus pride: the influence of emotional appeals across cultures. Journal of Consumer Research 25, 241-261. crossref(new window)

2.
Asia Economy How far does the korean's 'bluff' (2015, Januray 13). Retrieved from http://www.asiae.co.kr/news/view.htm?idxno=20140113111 64135932

3.
Bak, B. G. & Song, J. H. (2008). Exploration of the causal structure among change belief, goal orientation, self-regulated learning, achievement, and subjective well-being: an enlargement of dweck model. The Korean Psychological Association, 22(2), 333-350.

4.
Bang, J. H., Kang, S. R., & Kim, M. S. (2011). A study on the factors which affect consumers purchasing luxury products online: based on attitude function. The Korea Research Academy of Distribution Information, 14(1), 5-28.

5.
Berger, J. & Ward, M. (2010). Subtle signals of Inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 555-569. crossref(new window)

6.
Cho, G. J. (2009). A study on how unmarried women's consumption propensity and ethice affect attitudes toward luxury goods and their counterfeits. (Unpublished master's dissertation). University of Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

7.
Choi, S. H. (2001). A study on the attitude toward fashion luxury products. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 9(6), 842-854.

8.
Choi, S. H. (2003). The effects of the perceived product characteristics and conspicuous consumption on the fashion luxury involvement. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(2), 209-218.

9.
Chun, M. S., Lee, S. G., & Koh, A. R. (2006). The effect of cultural tendency on clothing consumption behavior. The Korean Psychological Association, 7(2), 277-300.

10.
Chun, S. Y. & Lee, S. J. (2005). A study on conformity and undividuality of consumers purchasing burberry fashion prestigious product. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 55(3), 136-149.

11.
Dubois, B. & Duquesne, P. (1993). The market for luxury goods: Income versus culture. European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35-45.

12.
Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-73. crossref(new window)

13.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: a world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285. crossref(new window)

14.
Erdley, C. A., Loomis, C. C., & Cain, K. M. (1997). Relations among children's social goals, implicit personality theories, and responses to social failure. Frances Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 263-72. crossref(new window)

15.
Escalas, J. E. & Bettam, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Researcch, 32, 378-389. crossref(new window)

16.
Fiske, S. T. & Taylor S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd Ed.). New York, U.S,: Mcgraw-Hill.

17.
Gang D. G. (1999). Effect of priming direction, level and product information of the product evaluation: complication for country-of-origin effects. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hanyang University, Seoul, Repulic of Korea.

18.
Grossman, G. M. & Shapiro, C. (1988). Counterfeitproduct trade. The American Economics Review, 78(3), 59-75.

19.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?. Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794. crossref(new window)

20.
Hong, B. S., Lee, E. J., & Yun, Y. J. (2010). The effect of relationship marketing implement factors of masstige fashion brand on the trust, satisfaction, and repurchase intention. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34(4), 663-672. crossref(new window)

21.
Jeon, K. S. & Park, H. J. (2005). The effect of fashion orientation and consumer needs for unqueness on buying intentions for luxury brands. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 29(2), 231-241.

22.
Jung, J. W., Joung, S. H., & Cha, K. W. (2003). Materialism, conspicuous consumption, and preference for imported luxury brands among college students. The Korean Home Management Association, 21(5), 1-12.

23.
Kim, M. J. (2008). An empirical study on the relationship among value of luxury goods, relationship quality, and behavioral intention of female university students (Unpublished master's dissertation). Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

24.
Kim, S. B. & Bae, I. H. (2005). A study on the antecedents and consequence of luxury goods preference: focus on luxury goods purchasing customer in department store. Journal of Product Research, 23(2), 29-51.

25.
Kim, Y. J., Song, S. Y., & Jhang, J. H. (2007). The effect of self-construal on product attitudes. Journal of Marking Research, 22(4), 157-173.

26.
Korea Economy (2013. November 16). Retrieved from http://www.hankyung.com/news/app/newsview.php?aid=2013111547781

27.
Lee, M. G. (2009). A study on the semiotic approach of logo in imported fashion luxury brands. Journal of Fashion Business, 13(2), 1-16.

28.
Lee, M. H., Lee, Y. R., & Ahn, M. Y. (2014). Luxury brand consumption values and signal preference based on cultural and economic capital. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 64(4), 91-105.

29.
Lee, S. G., Kim, M. Y., & Park, S. K. (2007). The study of the consumers' attitudes toward fashion counterfeit and brand equity: focusing on mediate role of brand attachment. The Korean Consumption Culture Association, 10(1), 87-104.

30.
Lee, S. H., Lee L., & Jung, S. Y. (2003). The effect of variables on fashion luxury brand purchasing behavior. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(22), 1241-1251.

31.
Lee, Y. N (2009). The effect on encoding varability and self construal product evaluation of the repeated ads. (Unpublished master's dissertation). Kwangwoon University. Seoul, Republic of Korea.

32.
Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation & endorsement: the role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421-36. crossref(new window)

33.
Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implication for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. crossref(new window)

34.
Nia, A. & Zaikowshy, L. (2000). Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 485-497. crossref(new window)

35.
Park H. S. & Kim H. S. (2011). The effect of benefits and online shopping risks on channel selection for luxury fashion items. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35(1), 13-25 crossref(new window)

36.
Park J. A. (2010). A study on korean and japanese consumers' attitudes and consumer knowledge about luxury brands. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34(8), 1303-1318. crossref(new window)

37.
Park, E. A., Kim., H. J., & Suh, H. S. (2009). The relationship among self-construals, body value, and appearance management behavior: a cross-cultural study. The Korean Psychological Association, 10(2), 251-274.

38.
Park, H. S. (2010). An analysis of the fashion luxury brand differentiation strategy. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 16(2), 252-262.

39.
Park, J. C. & Ryu, G. S. (2012). The influence of temporal construal and self-construal on consideration set formation. The Korean Society of Consumer Studies, 23(1), 29-53.

40.
Park, J. K. & John, D. R. (2010). Got to get you into my life do brand personalities rub off on consumers? Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 655-669. crossref(new window)

41.
Shin, G. C., Ku, Y. A., & Choi, S. H. (2011). The study on the influence of consumers value that affects brand charisma, brand attitude and purchase intention: with relevance to masstige brand. The Korean Society for Quaity Management, 39(4), 486-499.

42.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology bulletin, 580-591.

43.
Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances/private realities, The psychology self-monitoring. New York, U.S.:Freeman.

44.
Snyder, M. (1992). Motivational foundations of behavioural confirmation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 67-114. crossref(new window)

45.
Suh, Y. H., Oh, H. S., & Jeon, M. J. (2011). A study on how chemyon influence consuming behaviors for the luxury brands. The Society of Fashion and Textile Industry, 13(1), 25-313.

46.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520. crossref(new window)

47.
Vigneron, F. & Johnson, L. W. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 99(1), 484-506.

48.
Wong, N. & Ahuvia, A. (1998). Personal taste and family face. Psychology and Marketing, 15, 423-441. crossref(new window)

49.
Youm, D. S. & Yu, S. Y. (2012). A study on consumption behavior of korea consumers of luxury goods: focus on motivation, benefit and cost. The Korean Psychological Association, 13(3), 323-341.

50.
Zhang, D. N. (2009). A study on the purchase motives of luxury goods: cases in university female students. (Unpublished master's dissertation). Woosuk University, Wanju, Republic of Korea.

51.
Zhang, Y. & Betsy G. (1996). Matching advertising appeals to culture: the influence of products' use conditions. Journal of Advertising, 25, 29-46. crossref(new window)