JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Changes in Spatial Resolution at Position of the Detector in Digital Mammography System
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Changes in Spatial Resolution at Position of the Detector in Digital Mammography System
Kim, Hye-Min; Chon, Kwon Su;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
X-ray mammography is the most effective method for the diagnosis of calcified lesions of various breast diseases. To reduce patient dose and to obtain optimal image required for diagnosis, the performance of the mammography system should be maintained continuously. Because the target (anode) angle of the X-ray tube is measured from the central X-ray, the effective angle can be slightly different in view of the position on the detector, which can result in degrading spatial resolution of the imaging within the field of view. In this study, we measured the MTF to examine spatial resolution for positions on the detector in the digital mammography system. For a tungsten wire of diameter, the highest spatial frequency was obtained. It meant that a wire diameter for measuring MTF through LSF should be small compared to the pixel size of the detector used in the mammography system. The spatial resolution showed slightly different performance according to positions on the detector. The center position gave the best spatial resolution and positions away from the center showed the degraded performance although the difference of the spatial resolution was small. The effective focal spot size of the full width at half maximum also showed similar result. It concluded that the slightly increase of the effective focal spot size gave the degradation of the spatial resolution for positions on the detector.
 Keywords
Mammography;Modulation Transfer Function;Spatial Resolution;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2002 Annual Report of the Korea Central Cancer Registry, 2003.

2.
S. Y. Choi, C. S. Kim, "Development of Automatic Cluster Algorithm for Microcalcification in Digital Mammography," Korean Society of Radiological Science, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 45-52, 2009.

3.
R. H. Morgan, L. M. Bates, U. V. Gopala Rao, A. Marinaro, "The frequency response characteristics of x-ray films and screens," American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 92, pp. 426-440, 1964.

4.
K. Rossmann, "Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function, tools for the study of imaging systems," Radiology, Vol. 93 No. 2, pp. 257-329, 1969. crossref(new window)

5.
S. C. Bushong, Radiologic Science for Technologists, 10th Ed., Elsevier Science Health Science Co., Missouri, pp. 111-112, 2012.

6.
H. W. Cho, K. S. Chon, "Change of MTF for Sampling Interval in Digital Detector," Korean Society of Radiology, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp .224-230, 2014.

7.
J. M . Kim, H. W. Jung, J. W. Min, E. K. Yim, "Correction Method of Slit Modulation Transfer function on Digital Medical Imaging System," Korean Society of Radiological Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 133-139, 2006.

8.
M. Funke, N. Breiter, K. P. Hermann, J. W. Oestmann, E. Grabbe, "Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus x-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure," European Radiology, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 386-390, 1998. crossref(new window)

9.
H. Fujita, D. Y. Tsai, T. Itoh, K. Doi, J. Morishita, K. Ueda, A. Ohtsuka, "A Simple Method for Determining the Modulation Transfer Function in Digital Radiography," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 34-43, 1992. crossref(new window)

10.
Modulation Transfer Function of Screen-Film Systems, Report of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1986.

11.
R. A. Sones, G. T. Barnes, "A method to measure the MTF of digital x-ray systems," Medical Physics, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 166-237, 1992.

12.
J. Morishita, K. Doi, R. Bollen, P. C. Bunch, D. Hoeschen, G. Sirand-rey, Y. Sukenobu, "Comparison of two methods for accurate measurement of modulation transfer functions of screen-film systems," Medical Physics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 193-200 1995. crossref(new window)