JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Effectiveness of CT and MRI Contrast Agent for SUV in 18F-FDG PET/CT Scanning
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Effectiveness of CT and MRI Contrast Agent for SUV in 18F-FDG PET/CT Scanning
Cha, Sangyoung; Cho, Yonggwi; Lee, Yongki; Song, Jongnam; Choi, Namgil;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this study, among various factors having influence on SUV, we intended to compare and analyze the change of SUV using CT(4 type) and MRI(3 type) contrast agents which are commercialized now. We used Discovery 690 PET/CT(GE) and NEMA NU2 - 1994 PET phantom as experimental equipment. We have conducted a study as follows; first, we filled distilled water to phantom about two-thirds and injected radioisotope(18F-FDG 37 MBq), contrast agent. Second, we mixed CT contrast agent with distilled water and MRI contrast agent with that water separately. And then, we stirred the fluid and filled distilled water fully not to make air bubble. In emission scan, we had 15minutes scanning time after 40 minutes mixing contrast agent with distilled water. In transmission scan, we used CT scanning and its measurement conditions were tube voltage 120 kVp, tube current 40 mA, rotation time 0.5 sec, slice thickness 3.27 mm, DFOV 30 cm. Analyzing results, we set up some ROIs in 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th, 30th slice and measured SUVmean, SUVmax. Consequently, all images mixed 3 types of MRI contrast agent with distilled water have high SUVmean as compared with pure FDG image but there was no statistical significance. In SUVmax, they have high score and there was statistical significance. And other 4 images mixed 4 types of CT contrast agent with distilled water have significance in both SUVmean and SUVmax. Attenuation correction in PET/CT has been executed through various methods to make high quality image. But we figured out that using CT and MRI contrast agents before PET/CT scanning could make distortion of image and decrease diagnostic value. In that reason, we have to sort out the priority of examination in hospital not to disturb other examination`s results. Through this process, we will be able to give superior medical service to our customers.
 Keywords
Contrast Agents;SUV;PET/CT;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
요오드 조영제 사용이 감마카메라 영상에 미치는 영향,표성재;조윤호;최재호;

대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학, 2016. vol.39. 4, pp.557-564 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Y. G. Kang, Radiation protection and safety, Chunggu Publishing Co., pp. 1-11, 2004.

2.
J. K. Jung, M. C. Lee, Nuclear Medicine 3th, Korea Medicine Publishing Co., pp. 1-7, 2008.

3.
H. Y. Lee, "The analysis of $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT Images According to the Time Flow," Journal of the Korea Society of Radiology, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 47-51, 2012. crossref(new window)

4.
S. O. Park, S. M. An, K. R. Yu, M. G. Lee, S. S. Jang, K. S. Lee, H. J. Kim, H. J. Yang, S. J. Pyo, T. H. Choi, Nuclear medicine science, Daihaks Publishing Co., pp. 179-207, 2011.

5.
G. Antoch, L. S. Freudenberg, T. Beyer, A. Bockisch, J. F. Debatin, "To enhance or not enhance 18F-FDG and CT contrast agents in dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT," Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 56-65, 2004.

6.
G. Antoch, LS. Freudenberg, T. Egelhof, J. Stattaus, W. Jentzen, JF. Debatin, "A potential artifact in contrast enhansed dual-modality PET/CT scan," Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 1339-1345, 2002.

7.
Y. J. Jeong, D. Y. Kang, "The Effect of Intravenous Contrast on SUV Value in 18F-FDG PET/CT using Diagnostic High Energy CT," Korea Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 3 suppl, 169s-175s, 2006.

8.
S. J. Lee, H. H. Park, S. R. An, S. H. Oh, G. H. Nam, H. S. Yim, J. S. Kim, C. H. Lee, "A Comparative Study of the Standard Uptake Values of the PET Reconstruction Methods; Using Contrast Enhanced CT and Non Contrast Enhanced CT," Korea Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 235-240, 2008.

9.
H. K. Son, "Impact of physical factors for attenuation correction in quantitative positron emission tomography images," Graduate School, Yonsei University, pp. 10-81, 2005.

10.
YY. Yau, WS. Cha, YM. Tam, P. Vernon, S. Wong, M. Coel M, "Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: dose it really introduce significant attenuation correction error?," Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 46, pp. 283-291, 2005.

11.
E. H. Cho, "The Effect of MRI&CT Contrast Agents on PET Quantification," Graduate School, Korea University, pp. 13-40, 2012.

12.
J. I. Kim, I. S. Kim, H. J. Lee, J. E. Kim, "Effect of MRI Media Contrast on PET/CT," Korea Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 19-25, 2014.