JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Sexual Identity on the Personality of Marxism
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Sexual Identity on the Personality of Marxism
Kim, Yeoung-Sook;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The personality in Marx's philosophy can be defined as an 'activity on the basis of social relations'. This concept suggests two significant implications to the difference of sexual identity between the sexes. First, according to Marx's philosophy the personality is partially influenced by the ideology. Freud's theory of Oedipus is founded on the patriarchal culture including the ideology. Freud's concept of personality ignores that aspect. That's why Freud's theory of Oedipus complex can be criticized. This is because of his ignorance of the affecting power of male chauvinism in patriarchal society. Second, more importantly and definitely, the difference of activity, especially labor, that is, male's social labor and female's private labor, has influenced the difference of the personality of both sexes.
 Keywords
Personality;Activity;Ideology;Social Labor;Private Labor;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
H. J. Hrsg, Europaische Enziklopadie zu Philosophie und Wissenschftenn, Band 3, Felix Meiner Verlag, s.650-658, 1974.

2.
K. Marx, Thesen Uber Feuerbach, MEW, 3, Institut fur Marxismus-Leninismus, s.6, 1979.

3.
K. Marx, Okonomisch-philosophische Manuscripte, MEW, EB 1, Institut fur Marxismus-Leninismus, s.542, 1979.

4.
K. Marx, F. Engels, Die deutsche Ideologie, MEW, 3, Institut fur Marxismus-Leninismus, s.21, 1979.

5.
K. Marx, F. Engels, Die deutsche Ideologie, MEW, 3, Institut fur Marxismus-Leninismus,s.517, 1979.

6.
K. Marx, Grundrisse, MEW, 42, Institut fur Marxismus-Leninismus, s.396, 1979.

7.
K. Marx, Grundrisse, MEW, 42, Institut fur Marxismus-Leninismus, s.512, 1979.

8.
캐롤 길리건, 심리이론과 여성의 발달, 다른 목소리로 (허란주 옮김), 철학과 현실사, pp.20-41, 1994.

9.
Blum and Lawrence, "Kant's and Hegel's Moral Rationalism : A Feminist Perspective," in Canadian in Journal of Philosophy, Vol.13, No.2, pp.287-302, 1982.

10.
지그문트 프로이트, 프로이트 성애론(정성호 편역), 문학세계사, p.246, 1997.

11.
Margaret Whitford, "Introdution," The Irigaray Reader, Blackwell, p.6, 1991.

12.
뤼스 이리가레이, 성적 차이와 페미니즘 (권현정 엮음), 도서출판 공감, p.293, 1997.

13.
유진희, "김수현 홈드라마의 장르문법과 젠더 이데올로기 <엄마가 뿔났다>를 중심으로", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제10권, 제11호, p.104, 2010. crossref(new window)

14.
Nancy Chodorow, The Reproduction of Mothering, Berkeley, University of Califonia Press, p.47, 1978.

15.
조현순, "여성성과 젠더 정체성", 새 여성학 강의, (사)한국여성연구소 지음, 동녘, p.34, 1999.

16.
이연정, 모성의 담론과 현실, 나남출판, p.100, 1999.

17.
김영숙, "'지배하는 이성'과 '배려하는 이성'이라는 개념 쌍을 통해 본 영화<피아노>", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제11권, 제10호, p.141, 2011. crossref(new window)