JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Study on the Impact from the Concentration of Technological Innovation Activity to the Management Achievement : Focused in Listed ICT Companies
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Study on the Impact from the Concentration of Technological Innovation Activity to the Management Achievement : Focused in Listed ICT Companies
Ko, Young-kwon; Park, Jong-woo; Jo, Dong-hyuk;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
ICT sector has been made a great deal of achievements for past 20 or more years in the aspects of the industrial promotion and the efficiency improvement under the strong leadership by the government for the informatization and still leads the Korean industries. However, the previous studies are mostly on how the quantitative growth of patents impacts a company's management achievements while being insufficient on the qualitative level. In this study, an analysis is attempted on the impact from the qualitative level of patents held by a ICT company leading Korean industry to its management achievements. In other words, if the concentration of technological innovation activities, a scale to measure the qualitative level of possessed patents is influential to the growth and the profit of a company is analyzed. The analysis result shows that the current time technological superiority index, RTA and the concentration index, CRn of the technological innovation activities significantly impact to the growth and the profit of company. This study demonstrates the positive impact from a highly qualitative level of patents to the growth and the profit of a company in ICT sector in the current circumstance of insufficient researches on the qualitative level of patents. Therefore, this study is expected to present a new start point for the future studies.
 Keywords
ICT;intellectual property;Patent;tchnological Innovation;RTA;CRn;Management Achievement;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
이광훈, 오정숙, IT 기업의 기술혁신 특성 분석, 정보통신정책연구원, 2003.

2.
이원영, 박용태, 특허 데이터베이스를 활용한 기술-산업간 연계구조 분석과 한국 기업의 특허 전략 평가, 과학기술정책연구원, 2005.

3.
김선우, 최영훈, "국내 화학기업의 특허활동과 기업성과간의 관계 연구," 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회발표논문지, 제5권, 제1호, pp. 389-402, 2003.

4.
고상원, 조명현, 이경남, 권지인, IT 기업의 R&D가 시장가치에 미치는 영향, 정보통신정책연구원, 2004.

5.
박준수, 특허취득의 공시가 기업 가치에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구 : 코스닥시장을 중심으로, 단국대학교 대학원, 경영학박사학위논문, 2003.

6.
이기환, 윤병섭, "특허활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 : 벤처기업 대 일반기업," 기술혁신연구, 제14권, 제1호, pp. 67-99, 2006.

7.
류주한, "중소제조업체의 기술개발방식 선택에 관한 실증연구: 기술환경적 특성과 기업가적 역량의 상호작용을 중심으로," 기업경영연구, 제20권, 제1호, pp. 233-259, 2013.

8.
길상철, 강성민, "특허경영이 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 국내 금속기업 중심으로," 기술혁신학회지, 제11권, 제2호, pp. 171-193, 2008.

9.
신진교, 최영애, "중소기업의 R&D와 혁신: 중소정책지원의 조절효과," 기업경영연구, 제15권, 제1호, pp. 119-132, 2008.

10.
박준형, 곽기영, "특허 인용 관계가 기업 성과에 미치는 영향," 지능정보연구, 제19권, 제3호, pp. 217-139, 2013.

11.
이가희, 이상지, "특허 연계 스토리텔링의 멀티소스/멀티유즈 모델," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제15권, 제10호, pp. 447-456, 2015.

12.
진희정, 이시우, "한의학 특허 동향 조사-한국한의학연구원을 중심으로," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제12권, 제6호, pp. 223-229, 2012.

13.
F. Malerba and L. Orsenigo, "Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation are Technology-Specific," Research Policy, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 451-478, 1996. crossref(new window)

14.
J. Chan, D. J. Martin, and J. W. Kensinger, "Corporate Research and Developmen Expenditures and Share Value," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 255-276, 1990. crossref(new window)

15.
P. K. Chaney and T. M. Devinney, "New Product Innovation and Stock Price Performance," Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 112-145, 1992.

16.
H. Ernst, "Patenting Strategies in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry and Their Relationship to Company Performance," Technovation, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 225-240, 1995. crossref(new window)

17.
Z. Griliches, "Market Value, R&D and Patents," Economic Letters, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 183-187, 1981. crossref(new window)

18.
B. H. Hall, A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, "Market Value and Patent Citations : A First Look," NBER Working Paper, No. 7741, 2000.

19.
F. Narin, E. Noma, and R. Perry, "Patents as Indicators of Corparate Technological Strength," Research Policy, Vol. 16, No. 2/4, pp. 143-155, 1987. crossref(new window)

20.
T. G. Lee, "What affects a patent's value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic, and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach," scientometrics, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 623-633, 2009. crossref(new window)

21.
A. Pakes, "On Patent R&D and the Stock Market Rate of Return," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 390-409, 1985. crossref(new window)

22.
N. Van. Zeebroeck, "The Puzzle of patent value indicators," Solvay Brussels School of Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Working Paper, pp. 1-34, 2008.

23.
D. H. Austin, "An Event-study Approach to Measuring Innovative Output: The Case of Biotechnology," The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 253-258, 1993.

24.
D. Archibugi and M. Pianta, "Measuring Technological Change Through Patents and Innovation Survey," Technovation, Vol. 16, No. 9, pp. 451-468, 1996. crossref(new window)

25.
J. O. Lanjouw, "Patent Protection in the Shadow of Infringement: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value," Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 671-710, 1998. crossref(new window)

26.
J. Lerner, "The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis," Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 319-333, 1994. crossref(new window)

27.
J. Putnam, The Value of International Patent Protection, PhD. Thesis, Yale University, 1996.

28.
S. Scotchme, "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Innovation and the Patent Law," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 29-41, 1991.

29.
X. Ton and J. Frame, "Measuring National Technological Performance with Patent Claims Data," Research Policy, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 133-141, 1992.

30.
M. Trajtenberg, "A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Inventions," Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 172-187, 1990. crossref(new window)

31.
W. S. Comanor and F. M. Scherer, "Patents Statistics as a Measure of Technology Change," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 392-398, 1969. crossref(new window)

32.
D. Harhoff, Frederic M. Scherer, and Kartin Vopel, "Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights," Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1343-1363, 2003. crossref(new window)

33.
A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, "International knowledge: evidence from patent citations," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 105-136, 1999. crossref(new window)

34.
F. Narin, K. S. Hamilton, and D. Olivastro, "The Increasing Linkage between U.S. Technology and Public Science," Research Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 317-330, 1997. crossref(new window)

35.
L. Liang and L. Zhu, "Major Factors Affecting China's Inter-regional Research Collaboration-Regional Scientific Productibity and Geographical Proximity," Scientometrics, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 287-316, 2002. crossref(new window)

36.
L. Soete, "The Impact of Technological Innovation on International Trade Patterns-The Evidence Reconsidered," Research Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 101-130, 1987. crossref(new window)

37.
H. Grupp, "The Measurement of Technical Performance of Innovations by Technometrics and Its Impact on Established Technology Indicators," Research Policy, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 175-193, 1994. crossref(new window)