JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Effects of Elementary Science Teaching Program strengthening Aesthetic Experiences on Science Learning Motivation and Achievement
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Effects of Elementary Science Teaching Program strengthening Aesthetic Experiences on Science Learning Motivation and Achievement
Kim, Eun-Jeong; Bae, Jinho; So, Keum-Hyun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of elementary science teaching program strengthening aesthetic experiences on science learning motivation and achievement. The subjects of this study were divided into two groups. The experiment group practiced elementary science teaching program strengthening aesthetic experiences, while the control group practiced teacher guided-based instruction. The results of this study were as follows. First, science teaching program strengthening aesthetic experiences gave a significant influence on increasing the science learning motivation. Second, science teaching program strengthening aesthetic experiences gave a significant influence on increasing the science achievement. In conclusion, this study showed that elementary science teaching program strengthening aesthetic experiences gave a positive influence on the science learning motivation and science achievement in elementary school science.
 Keywords
aesthetic experiences;science learning motivation;science achievement;elementary science education;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Bloom, B. S. (1971). Affective consequence of school achievement. In J. M. Block(Ed), Mastery learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston.

2.
Bloom, J. D. (1992). The development of scientific knowledge in elementary school children: A context of meaning perspective. Science Education, 76, 399-413. crossref(new window)

3.
Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E. & Eliovitch, R. (1990). Applying the cognitive conflict strategy for conceptual changesome implications, difficulties, and problems. Science Education, 74, 555-569. crossref(new window)

4.
Girod, M. & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 102(3), 199-226. crossref(new window)

5.
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and it's contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 1, 69-82.

6.
Hidi, S. (2006). Interest and it's contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.

7.
Hoffman, L. (2002). Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447-465. crossref(new window)

8.
Hong, M., Jeong, E., Lee, M. & Kwak, Y. (2006). Analysis of Korean middle school student science achievement at international benchmarks in TIMSS 2003. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(2), 246-257.

9.
Hutcheson, F. (1973). An inquiry concerning beauty, order, harmony, design (Martinus Nijhoff, the hague).

10.
Jang, K. (1993). Gender difference on experience, attitude, future job preference and achievement concerning physics. Master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

11.
Jeong, E. (2005). An analysis of Korean middle school students' achievement of life science in TIMSS 2003. Biology Education, 33(3), 277-290.

12.
Jeong, E., Park, J. & Kim, K. (2006). An analysis of Korean middle school student science achievement in Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS 2003). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(1), 99-113.

13.
Kahle, J. B., Lakes, M. L. & Cho, H. H. (1985). An assessment of the impact of science experiences on the career choice of male and female biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 385-394. crossref(new window)

14.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

15.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.

16.
Kelly, G. A. (1977). The psychology of the unknown, In Bannister, D. (Ed). New perspectives in personal construct theory. N. Y.; Academy Press.

17.
Kim, B. & Kwon, J. (1995). The influence of the types of scientific concepts and the patterns of cognitive conflict on the change of students conceptions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 15(4), 472-486.

18.
Kim, H. (2010). Types of high-school students' aesthetic experiences and the effects on their affinity for science. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 60(3), 293-299.

19.
Kim, S. (1996). A study of causal relationship on science process skills and students' characteristics by covariance structure analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, South Korea.

20.
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an onto genetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383-409. crossref(new window)

21.
Kwak, Y., Kim, C., Lee, Y. & Jeong, D. (2006). Investigation on elementary and secondary students' interest in science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(3), 260-268.

22.
Lee, H. (2012). A study on scientific experience and motivation to leam science of elementary students. Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, South Korea.

23.
Lee, J. (2000). (A) Study on the interest and achievement of the elementary school science. Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, South Korea.

24.
Lee, M. & Jeong, E. (2004). A study on factors in school science influencing students' attitudes toward science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 946-058.

25.
Lee, M. & Kim, K. (2004). Relationship between attitudes toward science and science achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 399-407.

26.
Lee, S., Shin, H., Myeong, J. & Kim, C. (2010). The effect of science museum educational program on primary school students' science learning motivation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(1), 47-55.

27.
Milne, I. (2005) Creative aesthetic experiences and awe, wonder, and interest. Implications for primary science Key note address NZASE/TRRC primary science conference.

28.
Milne, I. (2010). A sense of wonder, arising from aesthetic experiences, should be the starting point for inquiry in primary science. Science Education International, 21(2), 102-115.

29.
Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2009). 2009 Revision curriculum : Science curriculum.

30.
National Science Board (1991). Science and engineering indicators 1991. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

31.
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86, 548-571. crossref(new window)

32.
Oh, J. (2004). The effects of science instruction using ARCS model on learning motive and academic achievement. Master's thesis, Busan National University of Education, Busan, South Korea.

33.
Park, Y. (2005). The correlation between the middle and high school students' level of science-related experience and their attitude toward science. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.

34.
Reynold, A. J. & Welberg, H. J. (1991). A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 97-107. crossref(new window)

35.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. crossref(new window)

36.
Ryu, J. (2006). (The) development and application of classified framework of asking questions for elementary science teaching. Doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, South Korea.

37.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173-208. crossref(new window)

38.
Schunk, D. H.(1984). Sequential attributional feedback and children's achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1159-1169. crossref(new window)

39.
Shirly, L. L. & Reynolds, R. E. (1988). Effects of interest on attention and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 159-166. crossref(new window)

40.
Solomon, J. (2004). Do primary school children ask spiritual questions. Education in Science, 207, 10-11.

41.
Uitto, A., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J. & Meisalo, V. (2006) Students' interest in biology and their out-of-school experiences. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 124-129. crossref(new window)

42.
Wellington, J. J. (1991). Newspaper science, school science: Friends of enemies. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 363-372. crossref(new window)

43.
Yoon, M. & Kim, S. (2003). A study on constructs of subject-specific interests and its relationship with academic achievement. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(3), 271-290.

44.
Zion, M. & Sadeh, I. (2007). Curiosity and open inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 162-168. crossref(new window)