JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Difficulties and Needs of Pre-service Elementary Teachers in the Science Class utilizing Smart Technologies in Teaching Practice
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Difficulties and Needs of Pre-service Elementary Teachers in the Science Class utilizing Smart Technologies in Teaching Practice
Na, Jiyeon; Jang, Byung-Ghi;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify pre-service elementary school teachers` difficulties and needs in the science class utilizing smart technologies. The participants were nine pre-service elementary teachers who had practical training at an elementary school and took classes related to technology, pedagogy, and science knowledge. The data was collected through semi-constructed and in-depth interviews. The documents such as participants` guidance plans, daily records produced in teaching practice was collected and analyzed. The results of the research are as follow: Pre-service teachers have usually used the technology as a secondary transfer media to convey the knowledge. We found that the pre-service elementary teachers had 15 difficulties in the science class utilizing smart technologies. In addition, they needed a class to focus more on teaching them by integrating technology knowledge, pedagogy knowledge, and science knowledge, and by sharing a real case of science class utilizing smart technologies.
 Keywords
technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK);science class utilizing smart technologies;smart education;pre-service elementary teacher;teaching practice;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
강경희(2009). 중등 과학 예비교사들이 교육실습에서 겪는 어려움 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(5), 580-591.

2.
강훈식, 김은경, 최숙영, 노태희(2010). 교육실습이 초등예비교사들의 과학 교수에 대한 자기 이미지에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 30(2), 261-274.

3.
강훈식, 유지연, 김경순, 이정순, 노태희(2009). 교육실습이 중등 예비교사들의 순환학습에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(4), 450-462.

4.
교육과학기술부(2011). 인재대국으로 가는 길: 스마트교육 추진전략 실행계획. 서울: 교육과학기술부.

5.
교육부(2000). 초.중등학교 정보통신기술교육 운영 지침-해설서(교육과정 자료 2000.12). 서울: 교육부.

6.
교육부(2015). 과학과 교육과정(교육과학기술부 고시 제 2015-74호 별책9). 서울: 교육부.

7.
나지연, 송진웅(2014). 테크놀로지 도입에 대한 과학교육학 연구동향의 분석 및 과학교사의 테크놀로지 활용 교수내용지식(TPCK)을 위한 시사점. 교사교육연구, 53(3), 511-524.

8.
박철용, 민희정, 백성혜(2008). 교육실습을 통한 예비과학교사의 교수내용지식 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), 641-648.

9.
배성아, 안정희(2014). 예비교사의 반성적 저널에서 나타난 수업시연과정에서 경험한 어려움과 의미 분석. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 14(11), 393-417.

10.
유기웅, 정종원, 김영석, 김한별(2012). 질적 연구방법의 이해. 서울: 박영사.

11.
윤혜경(2004). 초등 예비교사들이 과학 수업에서 겪는 어려움. 초등과학교육, 23(1), 74-84.

12.
윤혜경, 심재규, 박승재(1997). 물리교육 전공 학생들의 교육실습 과정 사례 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(3), 289-299.

13.
임병노, 임정훈, 성은모(2013). 스마트 교육 핵심 속성 및 스마트 교육 콘텐츠 유형 탐색. 교육공학연구, 29(3), 459-489.

14.
정애란, 맹승호, 이선경, 김찬종(2007). 교육실습에 참여한 예비과학교사의 과학수업 실행에 대한 관심 영역과 반성적 사고. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(9), 893-906.

15.
최무영(2008). 최무영 교수의 물리학 강의. 서울: 책갈피.

16.
Angeli, C. & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168. crossref(new window)

17.
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

18.
Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55, 1259-1269. crossref(new window)

19.
Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 3-29). NY: Routledge.

20.
McCrory, R. (2008). Science, technology, and teaching: The topic-specific challenges of TPCK in science. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 193-206). NY: Routledge.

21.
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers' knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054. crossref(new window)

22.
Niess, M. L. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and revising teacher preparation. From http://math.unipa.it/-grim/21_project/Niess445-449.pdf

23.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2010). Freamework for 21st century learning. Retrieved April 28, 2015, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework.

24.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

25.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. crossref(new window)

26.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. crossref(new window)

27.
Solomon, G. & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools. 엄우용, 최명숙, 박은실 역(2009). 웹 2.0과 교육. 서울: 아카데미 프레스.