JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Analysis of Inquiry Activity in the Material Domain of the Elementary Science Textbook by Science and Engineering Practices
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Analysis of Inquiry Activity in the Material Domain of the Elementary Science Textbook by Science and Engineering Practices
Cho, Seongho; Lim, Jiyeong; Lee, Junga; Choi, GeunChang; Jeon, Kyungmoon;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
We examined the inquiry activities in the material domain of the elementary science textbooks and experimental workbooks based on 2009 revised curriculum. The analysis framework was SEP (Science and Engineering Practices) - `Asking questions and defining problems`, `developing and using models`, `planning and carrying out investigations`, `analyzing and interpreting data`, `using mathematics and computational thinking`, `constructing explanations and designing solutions`, `engaging in argument from evidence`, and `obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information`. Sub-SEP of each grade band were also used. The results showed that the grade science textbooks and workbooks mainly emphasized `make observations and/or measurements`, `represent data in tables and/or various graphical displays`, or `use evidence to construct or support an explanation or design a solution to a problem` among around 40 sub-SEP. In the case of the inquiry activities for grade, majority of sub-SEP included were also only `collect data to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence to answer scientific questions or test design solutions`, `analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for phenomena` or `construct a scientific explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from sources`. The type of `asking questions and defining problems`, `using mathematics and computational thinking` or `obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information` were little found out of 8 SEP. Educational implications were discussed.
 Keywords
elementary science textbook;inquiry;science and engineering practice;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D. & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education:International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. crossref(new window)

2.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. crossref(new window)

3.
Asay, L. D. & Orgill, M. (2010). Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in The Science Teacher, 1998-2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 57-79. crossref(new window)

4.
Cho, H. J., Han, I. K. & Kim, H. N. (2008). Analysis of elementary teachers' views on barriers in implementing inquiry-based instructions. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(8), 901-921.

5.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.

6.
Ireland, J., Watters, J. J., Brownlee, J. L. & Lupton, M. (2014). Approaches to inquiry teaching: Elementary teacher's perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1733-1750. crossref(new window)

7.
Jeon, S. S. & Park, J. H. (2014). Analysis of relationships of scientific communication skills, science process skills, logical thinking skills, and academic achievement level of elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 34(7), 647-655. crossref(new window)

8.
Jeon, Y. (2015). An analysis of inquiry activities in high school chemistry II textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum: 8 Practices of science. Ewha Womans University Graduate School of Education, Dissertation of master.

9.
Kang, N. H. & Lee, E. M. (2013). An analysis of inquiry activities in high school physics textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(1), 132-143. crossref(new window)

10.
Kim, J. Y., Han, J. E. & Park, J. S. (2012). The analysis of inquiry activities in high school chemistry II textbooks on the revised 2009 curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(5), 928-937. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim, Y. S. (2015). Analysis of scientific and engineering practices within STEAM programs in Korea. Ewha Womans University Graduate School of Education, Dissertation of master.

12.
Krajcik, J. (2015). Project based science. The Science Teacher, 8(1), 25-27.

13.
Lim, S. M. (2015). An analysis of concepts and inquiry activities related to the ‘earth science' area in the South Korean elementary school textbooks to the current and a study on the improvement of future textbook. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(3), 288-296. crossref(new window)

14.
Lotter, C. Singer, J. & Godley, J. (2009). The influence of repeated teaching and reflection on preservice teachers' views of inquiry and nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 553-582. crossref(new window)

15.
Lucero, M., Valcke, M. & Schellens, T. (2013). Teachers' beliefs and self-reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1407-1423. crossref(new window)

16.
Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37.

17.
McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793-823. crossref(new window)

18.
Ministry of Education (2015). Science curriculum. http://nice.go.kr/

19.
Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2012). Science curriculum. http://nice.go.kr/

20.
National Educational Association [NEA]. (1894). Report of the committee of ten on secondary school studies with the reports of the conferences arranged by the committee. New York: The American Book Company.

21.
National Research Council [NRC] (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

22.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

23.
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In P. E. Bradwein (Ed.), The teaching of science (pp. 1-103). Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

24.
Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing "Science Practice" in learning settings. Science Education, 99(6), 1033-1040. crossref(new window)

25.
Wargo, B. M. (2014). Incorporating science and engineering practices into preservice secondary science teachers' planning practices: Testing the efficacy of an intervention. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

26.
Zhai, J., Jocz, J. A. & Tan, A.-L. (2014). Am I like a scientist?': Primary children's images of doing science in school. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 553-576. crossref(new window)