JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of reproducibility of prepared tooth impression scanning utilized with white and blue light scanners
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparison of reproducibility of prepared tooth impression scanning utilized with white and blue light scanners
Jeon, Jin-Hun; Sung, Hwan-Kyung; Min, Byung-Kuk; Hwang, Jae-Sun; Kim, Ji-Hwan; Kim, Woong-Chul;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study compared of reproducibility of prepared tooth impression scanning utilized with white and blue light scanners. Methods: To evaluate reproducibility with white and blue light scanners, the impression of premolar were rotated by and scanned. These data were compared with the first 3-D data (STL file), and the error sizes were measured (n
 Keywords
white light scanner;blue light scanner;reproducibility;color-difference-map;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Alikhasi M, Monzavi A, Bassir SH, Naini RB, Khosronedjad N, Keshavarz S. A comparison of precision of fit, rotational freedom, and torque loss with copy-milled zirconia and prefabricated titanium abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28(4), 996-1002, 2013. crossref(new window)

2.
Chang MH, Park SC. Automated scanning of dental impressions. Computer-Aided Design, 41(2), 404-411, 2009. crossref(new window)

3.
Cho SH, Schaefer O, Thompson GA, Guentsch A. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent, 113, 310-315, 2015. crossref(new window)

4.
Codari M, Pucciarelli V, Pisoni L, Sforza C. Laser scanner compared with stereophotogrammetry for measurements of area on nasal plaster casts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, Jun 2, 2015.

5.
Dahlmo KI, Andersson M, Gellerstedt M, Karlsson S. On a new method to assess the accuracy of a CAD program. Int J Prosthodont, 14, 276-283, 2001.

6.
Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent, 109(2), 121-128, 2013. crossref(new window)

7.
Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144(3), 471-478, 2013. crossref(new window)

8.
Hayashi K, Sachdeva AU, Saitoh S, Lee SP, Kubota T, Mizoguchi I. Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of new 3-dimensional scanning devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144(4), 619-625, 2013. crossref(new window)

9.
Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white-and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent, 114(4), 549-553, 2015. crossref(new window)

10.
Jeon JH, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of 3D white light scanning of abutment teeth impressions: evaluation of trueness and precision. J Adv Prosthodont, 6(6), 468-473, 2014. crossref(new window)

11.
Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Makynen A. Recent advances in dental optics -Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng, 54, 203-221, 2014. crossref(new window)

12.
Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent, 8(4), 283-294, 2005.

13.
Naidu D, Freer TJ. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144(2), 304-310, 2013. crossref(new window)

14.
Technical Committee ISO/TC 106, Dentistry, Subcommittee SC 9, Dental CAD/CAM Systems. ISO12836: 2012(E) Dentistry-digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations-test methods for assessing. Switzerland, International Organization for Standarization, 17, 2012.

15.
Trifkovic B, Budak I, Todorovic A, Vukelic D, Lazic V, Puskar T. Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. Measurement, 47, 45-53, 2014. crossref(new window)