JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Influencing factors of satisfaction and revisiting intention of dental implant patients
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Influencing factors of satisfaction and revisiting intention of dental implant patients
Lee, Jong-Hwa; Park, Chun-Man;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of the study is to investigate the influencing factors of satisfaction and revisiting intention of dental implant patients. Methods: An interview and a self-reported questionnaire were completed by 190 patients in 10 dental clinics in Daegu, Gyeongbuk, and Gyeongnam from September 17 to October 31, 2015. The questionnaire consisted of the general characteristics of the subjects and satisfaction of implant. The instrument for implant interview was adapted form Pjetursson et al. by Likert 5 points scale. Cronbach`s in the study was 0.768. Data were analyzed by SPSS/AMOS version 21.0 program. Results: Cost satisfaction had direct effect on satisfaction of expectation and indirect effect on revisiting intent. Mastication satisfaction had the direct effect on satisfaction of expectation and revisiting intent, and indirect effect on revisiting intent. Satisfaction of aesthetic function had the direct effect on satisfaction of expectation, and the indirect effect on revisiting intent. Conclusions: The determining factors of successful dental implant included expenses, mastication function, and aesthetic satisfaction. The competent dental implant teamwork and appropriate expenses can satisfy the implant patients.
 Keywords
dental implant;path analysis;revisiting intention;satisfaction;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Jeon JH, Min HH, Kim YS. Relationship between satisfaction of dental service, value quality, and reuse intention. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2014; 14(5): 765-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.05.765. crossref(new window)

2.
Branemark PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: I. experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3(2): 81-100. crossref(new window)

3.
Kim SW, Cho IH. On the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants installed at defect site filled with xenograft material. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2014; 52(1): 9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.1.9. crossref(new window)

4.
Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate functional loading of Branemark single tooth implants: An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11(1): 26-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001026.x. crossref(new window)

5.
Lee SU, Kim JH. A study on satisfaction factors with dental implant patients. J Kor Aca Den Tech 2006; 28(1): 67-81.

6.
Cho MS, Yoo SJ, Yang DH. Associated factors which influence satisfaction of dental implant patients and intention to revisit using structural equation model. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2013; 13(2): 221-30. crossref(new window)

7.
Kim JH, Ji KJ, Park CM. Impact of medical service quality by attribute on overall satisfaction: focused on out-patient and in-patient in high-level general hospital. Korean Journal of Hospital Management 2013; 18(1): 18-41.

8.
Kim MY, Choi HN, Shin HS. Dental implant bottom-up cost analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2014; 52(1): 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.1.18. crossref(new window)

9.
Kim TI. The rehabilitation in implant prosthesis for partially edentulous. J Kor Dent Assoc 2001; 39(9): 724-31.

10.
Choi SO. A study on patients' perception on and expectation about dental implant. J Korean Acad Dent Hyg 2005; 7(1): 99-112.

11.
Jamiyandorj O, Kim JH, Kim MS, Park YB, Shim JS. Comparison of removal torque between prefabricated and customized abutment screw. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2012; 50(4): 243-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.4.243. crossref(new window)

12.
Go EJ, Jang GW. A study on subjective awareness and expectations of implant patients. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2010; 10(1): 107-25.

13.
Kim SK, Kim SY, Jeon HY, Lee KH. Awareness and satisfaction on dental implant treatment. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2013; 13(3): 395-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2013.13.3.395. crossref(new window)

14.
Choi HS, Gu IY, Yu EM. A study on implant awareness and attitude to oral hygiene care: The case of dental consumers in seoul and gyeonggi province. J Korean Acad Dent Hyg 2010; 12(1): 37-45.

15.
Kim GU, Choi SM. A study on the factors giving effects to patient's satisfaction in the selection of implant operation. J Korea Acad Industr Coop Soc 2010; 11(11): 4354-9. crossref(new window)

16.
Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. Parasuraman A. The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Marketing 1996; 60(2), 31-46.

17.
Jeong IH, Lee SJ, Kim BS, Park YD, Ji KJ, Park JY. et al. The influence that the medical service quality of the dental clinic affects to the patient satisfaction and use intention. J Kor Aca Den Tech 2013; 35(4): 387-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2013.35.4.387. crossref(new window)

18.
Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy: A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16(2): 185-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x. crossref(new window)

19.
Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang BR. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78(6): 574-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70008-8. crossref(new window)

20.
Kim JS, Park JY, Baek JM, Lee JH. Treatment satisfaction and oral health behavior of the before and after dental implanting treatment. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2013; 13(6): 1087-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2013.13.06.1087. crossref(new window)

21.
Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7(1): 40-4.

22.
Lee KB. Considerations of occlusion for implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Kor Dent Assoc 2013; 51(5): 242-9.

23.
Hudson JD, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74(6): 647-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80319-1. crossref(new window)

24.
Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. Current status of zirconia-based fixed restorations. J Oral Sci 2010; 52(4): 531-39. crossref(new window)