Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Mixing Ratio between Pork Loin and Chicken Breast on Textural and Sensory Properties of Emulsion Sausages
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Mixing Ratio between Pork Loin and Chicken Breast on Textural and Sensory Properties of Emulsion Sausages
Kim, Hyun-Wook; Choi, Min-Sung; Hwang, Ko-Eun; Song, Dong-Heon; Kim, Yong-Jae; Ham, Youn-Kyung; Chang, Seong-Jin; Lim, Yun-Bin; Choi, Yun-Sang; Kim, Cheon-Jei;
  PDF(new window)
This study is conducted to evaluate the effects of the mixing ratio between pork loin and chicken breast for textural and sensory properties of emulsion sausages. Meat homogenates are prepared by using five mixing ratios between pork loin and chicken breast (100:0, 70:30, 50:50, 30:70, and 0:100), and the emulsion sausages are also formulated with five mixing ratios. The additions of chicken breast increase the salt soluble protein solubility due to high pH levels of chicken breast, thereby resulting in the reduction of cooking losses. In addition, the apparent viscosity of meat homogenates increase with increasing amounts of chicken breast. In terms of emulsion sausages formulated with pork loin and chicken breast, the addition of chicken breast above 50% may contribute to a softer and more flexible texture of emulsion sausages. For sensory evaluations, an increase in the added amount of chicken breast contributes to a rich umami taste and deeper flavor within the emulsion sausages, resulting in the high overall acceptance score for the formulation of 0-30% pork loin and 70-100% chicken breast. Therefore, the optimal mixing ratios between pork loin and chicken breast are 0-30% and 70-100% for enhancing the textural and sensory properties of emulsion sausages.
chicken breast;emulsion sausage;pork loin;sensory characteristics;
 Cited by
Asghar, A., Samejima, K., Yasui, T., and Henrickson, R. L. (1985) Functionality of muscle proteins in gelation mechanisms of structured meat products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 22, 27-106. crossref(new window)

ASTM. (1981) American Society for Testing and Materials. Guidelines for the selection and training of sensor and panel members. ASTM STP 758, ASTM Philadelphia, 3-33.

Barbut, S., Zhang, L., and Marcone, M. (2005) Effects of pale, normal, and dark chicken breast meat on microstructure extractable proteins, and cooking of marinated fillets. Poult. Sci. 84,797-802. crossref(new window)

Bourne, M. C. (1978) Texture profile analysis. Food Technol. 32, 62-66.

Choi, Y. S., Choi, J. H., Han, D. J., Kim, H. Y., Lee, M. A., Kim, H. W., Lee, J. W., Chung, H. J., and Kim, C. J. (2010) Optimization of replacing pork back fat with grape seed oil and rice bran fiber for reduced-fat meat emulsion systems. Meat Sci. 84, 212-218. crossref(new window)

Cofrades, S., Careche, M., Carballo, J., and Colmenero, F. J. (1993) Protein concentration, pH and ionic strength affect apparent viscosity of actomyosin. J. Food Sci. 58, 1269-1272. crossref(new window)

Dorado, M., Martin Gomez, E. M., Jimenez-Colmenero, F., and Masoud, T. A. (1999) Cholesterol and fat contents of Spanish commercial pork cuts. Meat Sci. 51, 321-323. crossref(new window)

Farouk, M. M., Wieliczko, K., Lim, R., Turnwald, S., and MacDonald, G. A. (2002) Cooked sausage batter cohesiveness as affected by sarcoplasmic proteins. Meat Sci. 61, 85-90. crossref(new window)

Fletcher, D. L., Qiao, M., and Smith, D. P. (2000) The relationship of raw broiler breast meat color and pH to cooked meat color and pH. Poultry Sci. 79, 784-788. crossref(new window)

Forrest, J. C., Aberle, E. D., Hedrick, H. B., Judge, M. D., and Merkel, R. A. (1975) Principles of meat processing. Principles of meat science. W. H. Freeman and Company. San Francisco, CA. pp. 190-226.

Gillett, T. A., Meiburg, D. E., Brown, C. L., and Simon, S. (1977) Parameters affecting meat protein extraction and interpretation of model system data for meat emulsion formation. J. Food Sci. 42, 1606-1610. crossref(new window)

Gornall, A. G., Bardawill, C. J., and David, M. M. (1949) Determination of serum proteins by means of the Biuret reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 177, 751-766.

Hämäläinen, N. and Pette, D. (1995) Patterns of myosin isoforms in mammalian skeletal muscle fibres. Microsc. Res. Techniq. 30, 381-389. crossref(new window)

Joo, S. T., Kauffman, R. G., Kim, B. C., and Park, G. B. (1999) The relationship of sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar protein solubility to colour and water-holding capacity in porcine longissimus muscle. Meat Sci. 52, 291-297. crossref(new window)

Karlsson, A. H., Klont, R. E., and Fernandez, X. (1999) Skeletal muscle fibres as factors for pork quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 60, 255-269. crossref(new window)

King, N. J. and Whyte, R. (2006) Does it look cooked? a review of factors that influence cooked meat color. J. Food Sci. 71, R31-R40. crossref(new window)

Klont, R. E., Brocks, L., and Eikelenboom, G. (1998) Muscle fibre type and meat quality. Meat Sci. 49, S219-S229. crossref(new window)

Kranene, R. W., Van Kuppevelt, T. H., Goedhart, H. A., Veerkamp, C. H., Lambooy, E., and Veerkamp, J. H. (1999) Hemoglobin and myoglobin content in muscles of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 78, 467-476. crossref(new window)

Lan, Y. H., Novakofski, J., McCusker, R. H., Brewer, M. S., Carr, T. R., and McKeith, F. K. (1995) Thermal gelation myofibrils from pork, beef, fish, chicken and turkey. J. Food Sci. 60, 941-945. crossref(new window)

Lawrie, R. A. (1998) Lawrie's meat science. 6thed, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England, pp. 212-219.

Lesiow, T. and Xiong, Y. L. (2003) Chicken muscle homogenate gelation properties: effect of pH and muscle fiber type. Meat Sci. 64, 399-403. crossref(new window)

Maughan, C. and Martini, S. (2012) Identification and quantification of flavor attributes present in chicken, lamb, pork, beef, and turkey. J. Food Sci. 77, S115-S121. crossref(new window)

Newcom, D. W., Stalder, K. J., Baas, T. J., Goodwin, R. N., Parrish, F. C., and Wiegand, B. R. (2004) Breed differences and genetic parameters of myoglobin concentration in porcine longissimus muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 82, 2264-2268. crossref(new window)

Saffle, R. L. and Galbreath, J. W. (1964) Quantitative determination of salt-soluble protein in various types of meat. Food Technol. 18, 1943-1944.

Samejima, K., Lee, N. H., Ishioroshi, M., and Asghar, A. (1992) Protein extractability and thermal gel formability of myofibrils isolated from skeletal and cardiac muscles at different post-mortem periods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 58, 385-393. crossref(new window)

Smith, D. P. and Fletcher, D. L. (1987) Chicken breast muscle fiber type and diameter as influenced by age and intramuscular location. Poultry Sci. 67, 908-913.

Tornberg, E. (2005) Effects of heat on meat proteins - Implication on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Sci. 70, 493-508. crossref(new window)

Tsai, R., Cassens, R. G., and Briskey, E. J. (1972) The emulsifying properties of purified muscle proteins. J. Food Sci. 37, 286-288. crossref(new window)

Whiting, R. C. and Jenkins, R. K. (1981) Comparison of rabbit, beef, and chicken meats for functional properties and frankfurter processing. J. Food Sci. 46, 1693-1696. crossref(new window)

Ziegler, G. R., Rizvi, S. S. H., and Acton, J. C. (1987) Relationship of water content to textural characteristics, water activity, and thermal conductivity of some commercial sausages. J. Food Sci. 52, 901-905. crossref(new window)

Zorba, O. and Kurt, S. (2006) Optimization of emulsion characteristics of beef, chicken and turkey meat mixtures in model system using mixture design. Meat Sci. 73, 611-618. crossref(new window)