JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of Conventional and Organic Cattle (Hanwoo) Farm System
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Journal of Animal Environmental Science
  • Volume 20, Issue 4,  2014, pp.161-166
  • Publisher : Korean Association for Livestock Housing and Environment
  • DOI : 10.11109/JAES.2014.20.4.161
 Title & Authors
Comparison of Conventional and Organic Cattle (Hanwoo) Farm System
Cheon, Si-Nae; Lee, Jun-Yeob; Yang, Seung-Hak; Park, Kyu-Hyun; Jeon, Jung-Hwan;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
We conducted investigations of the information and welfare of cattle in Korea. The livestock housing of conventional cattle farms and organic cattle farms were open side wall type with winch curtain and used litter floor. The stocking density of conventional (ranging from to ) and organic cattle farms (ranging from to ) met the demand for conventional or organic standards, respectively. The galvanized plate and sunlight plate were used as the roof material in all of farms. Especially, additional areas were provided to produce forage or to improve animal welfare in organic cattle farms. Thus we believe that present data contribute to develop the animal welfare certification for cattle and to improve animal welfare in Korea.
 Keywords
Hanwoo;Conventional cattle farm;Organic cattle farm;Livestock housing;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Blom, J.Y., 1983. Traumatic injuries and foot diseases as related to housing systems. Farm Animal Housing and Welfare, Martinus Nijhoff publishers, Boston, Ma, 216-225.

2.
Brscic, M., Heutinck, L.F.M., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., Stockhofe, N., Engel, B., Visser, E.K., Van Reenen, C.G., 2011. Prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders recorded at postmortem inspection in white veal calves and associated risk factors. J. Dairy Sci. 94(2), 853-863. crossref(new window)

3.
Cook, N.B., Bennett, T.B., Nordlund, K.V., 2004. Effect of free stall surface on daily activity patterns in dairy cows with relevance to lameness prevalence. J. Dairy Sci. 87(9), 2912-2922. crossref(new window)

4.
Cook, N.B., Nordlund, K.V., Oetzel, G.R., 2004. Environmental influences on claw horn lesions associated with laminitis and subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87, E36-E46. crossref(new window)

5.
Drissler, M., Gaworski, M., Tucker, C.B., Weary, D.M., 2005. Freestall maintenance: Effects on lying behavior of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 88(7), 2381-2387. crossref(new window)

6.
FAWC. 1992. FAWC updates the five freedoms.

7.
Fisher, A.D., Verkerk, G.A., Morrow, C.J., Matthews, L.R., 2002. The effects of feed restriction and lying deprivation on pituitaryadrenal axis regulation in lactating cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 73(2), 255-263. crossref(new window)

8.
Fregonesi, J.A., Leaver, J.D., 2002. Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behaviour, performance and health of dairy cows housed in straw yard and cubicle systems. Livest. Prod. Sci. 78(3), 245-257. crossref(new window)

9.
Fregonesi, J.A., Veira, D.M., Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., Weary, D.M., 2007. Effects of bedding quality on lying behavior of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90(12), 5468-5472. crossref(new window)

10.
Fregonesi, J.A., Tucker, C.B., Weary, D.M., 2007. Overstocking reduces lying time in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90(7), 3349-3354. crossref(new window)

11.
Haley, D.B., Rushen, J., Passille, A.D., 2000. Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing. Canadian J. Animal Sci. 80(2), 257-263. crossref(new window)

12.
Haley, D.B., De Passille, A.M., Rushen, J., 2001. Assessing cow comfort: effects of two floor types and two tie stall designs on the behaviour of lactating dairy cows. Applied Sci. 71(2), 105-117.

13.
Hansen, L.B., 2000. Consequences of selection for milk yield from a geneticist's viewpoint. J. Dairy Sci. 83(5), 1145-1150. crossref(new window)

14.
Huzzey, J.M., DeVries, T.J., Valois, P., Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., 2006. Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 89(1), 126-133. crossref(new window)

15.
Jensen, M.B., Pedersen, L.J., Munksgaard, L., 2005. The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions. Applied Sci. 90(3), 207-217.

16.
Krawczel, P.D., Klaiber, L.B., Butzler, R. E., Klaiber, L.M., Dann, H.M., Mooney, C. S., Grant, R.J., 2012. Short-term increases in stocking density affect the lying and social behavior, but not the productivity, of lactating Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95(8), 4298-4308. crossref(new window)

17.
Leonard, F.C., O'Connell, J.M., O'Farrell, K.J., 1996. Effect of overcrowding on claw health in first-calved Friesian heifers. British Vet. J, 152(4), 459-472. crossref(new window)

18.
Mattiello, S., Arduino, D., Tosi, M.V., Carenzi, C., 2005. Survey on housing, management and welfare of dairy cattle in tie-stalls in western Italian Alps. Acta Agric. Scand, Section A-Animal Science, 55(1), 31-39.

19.
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Notification 2013-85.

20.
Munksgaard, L., Ingvartsen, K.L., Pedersen, L.J., Nielsen, V.K.M., 1999. Deprivation of lying down affects behaviour and pituitaryadrenal axis responses in young bulls. Acta Agric. Scand, Section A-Animal Science, 49(3), 172-178.

21.
National Agricultural Products Quality Management Sercvice. Notification 2011-40.

22.
Rauw, W.M., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N., Grommers, F.J., 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56(1), 15-33. crossref(new window)

23.
Reich, L.J., Weary, D.M., Veira, D.M., Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., 2010. Effects of sawdust bedding dry matter on lying behavior of dairy cows: A dose-dependent response. J. Dairy Sci. 93(4), 1561-1565. crossref(new window)

24.
RSPCA. 2010. Welfare Standards for Beef cattle. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, UK.

25.
RSPCA., 2011. Welfare Standards for Dairy cattle. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, UK.

26.
Singh, S.S., Ward, W.R., Lautenbach, K., Murray, R.D., 1993. Behaviour of lame and normal dairy cows in cubicles and in a straw yard. Vet. Rec, 133(9), 204-208. crossref(new window)

27.
Somers, J.G.C.J., Schouten, W.G.P., Frankena, K., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N., Metz, J.H. M., 2005. Development of claw traits and claw lesions in dairy cows kept on different floor systems. J. Dairy Sci. 88(1), 110-120. crossref(new window)

28.
Tessitore, E., Boukha, A., Guzzo, L., Cozzi, G., 2010. Effects of pen floor on clinical and behavioural parameters of newly received beef cattle fattened under intensive rearing systems. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 8(3s), 190-192. crossref(new window)

29.
Tucker, C.B., Weary, D.M., Fraser, D., 2003. Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86(2), 521-529. crossref(new window)

30.
Tucker, C.B., Weary, D.M., 2004. Bedding on geotextile mattresses: How much is needed to improve cow comfort? J. Dairy Sci. 87(9), 2889-2895. crossref(new window)

31.
Tucker, C.B., Rogers, A.R., Verkerk, G. A., Kendall, P.E., Webster, J.R., Matthews, L.R., 2007. Effects of shelter and body condition on the behaviour and physiology of dairy cattle in winter. Applied Sci. 105(1), 1-13. crossref(new window)

32.
Valde, J.P., Hird, D.W., Thurmond, M.C., Osteras, O., 1996. Comparison of ketosis, clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, and reproductive performance between free stall and tie stall barns in Norwegian dairy herds with automatic feeding. Acta Vet. Scand, 38(2), 181-192.

33.
Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., Buijs, S., Tuyttens, F. A., 2009. Societal concern related to stocking density, pen size and group size in farm animal production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 123(1), 16-22. crossref(new window)