JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Methodology for Estimating Stochastic CO2 Emission for Construction Operation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Methodology for Estimating Stochastic CO2 Emission for Construction Operation
Yi, Chang-Yong; Gwak, Han-Seong; Lee, Dong-Eun;
 
 Abstract
Reducing greenhouse gas(GHG) emissions is a worldwide concern. Low carbon construction is an important operation management goal. Construction resources(i.e., equipment and laborer) are major contributors to producing GHG, and they are the main target for achieving low carbon construction. The amount of Carbon emissions varies depending on the operating conditions. This paper introduces a method which measures the variability of carbon emissions amounts. First, it allows creating construction operation models of which the level of detail is breakdown into the work task level. It makes use of the equipments' hourly fuel consumption and laborers' hourly respiration rate. Second, the method implements sensitivity analysis along with ranges of resources that are allocated in an operation model. It facilitates to find the optimal resource combination using the operation performances such as the amount of emissions, operation completion time, operation completion cost, and productivity. Third, it identifies the best fit probability distribution functions of performance criteria given a certain resource combination. It allows project manager to query the chance to complete the operation within limitations of multiple performance criteria specified by the system users.
 Keywords
Carbon Dioxide;Greenhouse Gas;Discrete Event Simulation;Construction Operation Model;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
에너지 절감을 위한 토공 장비군 최적화 시스템,이창용;이홍철;서종원;이동은;

대한건축학회논문집:구조계, 2015. vol.31. 4, pp.137-144 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Ahn, C. B., An integrated framework for sustainable construction processes: understanding and managing the environmental performance of construction operations, Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Urbana, Illinois, 2012

2.
Bilec, M., Ries, R., Matthews, H. S., and Sharrard, A. L., Example of a hybrid life-cycle assessment of construction process, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(4), 207-215, 2006 crossref(new window)

3.
Caterpillar, Caterpillar performance handbook, 40th Ed., Caterpillar Peoria, 2010

4.
Cole R. J., Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural system, Building and Environment, 34(3), 335-348, 1998 crossref(new window)

5.
EPA, Potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the construction sector, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., 2009

6.
Gonzalez, V., Echaveguren, T., Exploring the environmental modeling of road construction operations using discrete-event simulation, Automation in Construction, 24, 100-110, 2012 crossref(new window)

7.
Guggemos, A. A., and Horvath, A., Decision-Support Tool for Assessing the Environmental Effects of Construction Commercial Buildings, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 12(4), 187-195, 2006 crossref(new window)

8.
Halpin, D. W. and Riggs, L. S., "Planning and analysis of construction operations", John Wiley & Sons, 1992

9.
Hasan, S., Bouferguene, A., Al-Hussein, M., Gillis, P., and Telyas, A., Productivity and $CO_2$ emission analysis for tower crane utilization in high-rise building projects, Automation in Construction, 31, 255-264, 2013 crossref(new window)

10.
Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., and Lave, L. B., Economic input-output models for environmental life cycle analysis, Environmental Science and Technology, 32(7), 184A-191A, 1998 crossref(new window)

11.
Int Panis, L., De Geus, B., Vandenbulcke, G., Willems, H., Degraeuwe, B., Bleux, N., Mishra, V., Thomas, I., and Meeusen, R., Exposure to particulate matter in traffic: a comparison of cyclists and car passengers, Atmospheric Environment, 44(19), 2263-2270, 2010 crossref(new window)

12.
IPCC, Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Vol. 2, 2006

13.
Lee, D. E., Yi, C. Y., Lim, T. K., and Arditi, D., Integrated Simulation System for Construction Operation and Project Scheduling, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 24(6), 557-569, 2010 crossref(new window)

14.
Liu, S., Tao, R., and Tam C. M., Optimizing cost and $CO_2$ emission for construction projects using particle swarm optimization, Habitat International, 37, 155-162, 2013 crossref(new window)

15.
Li, X. D., Zhu, Y. M., and Zhang, Z. H., An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction process, Building and Environment, 45, 766-775, 2010 crossref(new window)

16.
Ochoa, L., Hendrickson, C., and Matthews, H. S., Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of U. S. residential buildings, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8(4), 132-138, 2002 crossref(new window)

17.
Peurifoy, R. L., Schexnayder, C. J., and Shapira, A., "Construction Planning, Equipment, and Methods", 7th Ed., Mcgraw-Hill. 2009

18.
Sharrard, A. L., Matthews, H. S., and Ries, R. J., Estimating construction project environmental effects using an input-output-based hybrid life-cycle assessment Model, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14(4), 327-336, 2008 crossref(new window)

19.
Sherwood, L., Fundamentals of Physiology with Infotrac: A Human Perspective, Cengage Learning, 2006

20.
Vieira, P. M. S., Environmental assessment of office buildings, Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 2007

21.
Wilmore, J. H., Costill, D. L., and Kenney, W. L., Physiology of sport and exercise, USA: Human kinetics, 2004

22.
Yan, H., Shen, Q., Fan, L. C. H., Wang, Y., and Zhang, L., Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of One Peking in Hong Kong, Building and Environment, 45, 949-955, 2010 crossref(new window)