JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Damage Assessment of Neinforced Concrete Column under Combined Effect of Axial Load and Blast Load by Using P-M Interaction Diagram
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Damage Assessment of Neinforced Concrete Column under Combined Effect of Axial Load and Blast Load by Using P-M Interaction Diagram
Kim, Han-Soo; Choi, Hyung-Bin;
 
 Abstract
In this paper, the damage contour of reinforced concrete columns under blast load was compared with its P-M interaction diagram to evaluate the simplified analysis for blast resisting performance of reinforced concrete column. Autodyn which was specialized for analysis of explosion and impact was used to simulate the structural behavior of the columns under combined effect due to axial and blast loading. The weight of explosive is fixed on most threatening weight, 20kg, and distance of explosive is varied from 1m to 5m. According to the analysis, the damage contour of reinforced concrete column showed very similar shape to P-M interaction diagram as its axial load and blast induced additional bending moment changes. Therefore, the damage and failure behavior of reinforced concrete column can be predicted from damage contour on P-M interaction diagram.
 Keywords
Blast Analysis;RC Analysis;Damage assessment;P-M interaction diagram;Axial load;Blast load;Autodyn;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
폭발해석을 위한 간략 폭발하중 제안식,전두진;한상을;

한국전산구조공학회논문집, 2016. vol.29. 1, pp.67-75 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Longinow, A. and Mniszewski, K.R., Protecting Buildings Against Vehicle Bomb Attacks, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 1, No. 1, p.p. 51-54., 1996 crossref(new window)

2.
Corley, W.G., Mlakar Sr., P.f., Sozen, M.A., and Tornton, C.H., "The Oklahoma City Bombing: Summary and Recommendations for Multihazard Mitigation,", Jornal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 12, No. 3, p.p. 100-112., 1998. crossref(new window)

3.
Aldo M., Kirk M., Manuel D., Alternate Path Method in Progressive Collapse Analysis, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 17., p.p. 152-160, 2012 crossref(new window)

4.
GSA. Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modemization Projects, The U.S. General Services Administration, Washington, D. C., 2003

5.
DoD. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) - Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, Department of Defence, Washington, D. C., 2005

6.
Shi Y. and Hao H. and Li Z., Numerical Derivation of Pressure-Impulse Diagrams for Prediction of RC Column Damage to Blast Loads, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 35, p.p. 1213-1227, 2008 crossref(new window)

7.
Mutalib A. and Hao H., Development of P-I Diagrams for FRP Strengthed RC Columns, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 38, p.p. 290-304, 2011 crossref(new window)

8.
Wu K. Li B. Tsai K., Residual Axial Compression Capacity of Localized Blast-Damaged RC Columns, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 38, p.p. 29-40, 2011 crossref(new window)

9.
Zukas J A., Introduction to Hydrocodes, Elsevier, UK, p.p. 313, 2004.

10.
Smith P.D., Hetherington J.G., Blast and Ballistic Loading of Structure, Laxton's, Great Britain, p.p. 336.

11.
Cormie, David & Mays, Geoff & Smith, Peter, Blast Effects on Buildings, 2nd edition, Thomas telford, UK, p.p. 338, 2009.

12.
Kingery, C. N. and Bulmash, G., Airblast Parameters from TNT Spherical Air Burst and Hemispherical Surface Burst Technical Report ARBRL-TR-02555, US Army Research and Development Centre, 1994.

13.
IATG, International Ammunition Technical Guideline, UN SaferGuard, 1st edition, p.p. 4-6., 2013.

14.
Biggs, John M., Introduction to Structural Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, NY, p. 341, 1964.

15.
Russell C. H., Structural Analysis 7th edition, Prentice Hall, p. 666, 2009.

16.
Nystrom U. and Gylltoft K,. Numerical Studies of The Combined Effects of Blast and Fragment Loading, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 36, p.p. 995-1005, 2009. crossref(new window)

17.
Ansys, AUTODYN Theory Manual, Century dynamics, p.235, 2005.

18.
김한수, 박재표, 전산해석을 이용한 CFT 기둥의 폭발저항성능 평가, 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, Vol. 27, No. 3, p.p. 65-72, 2010

19.
김한수, 안효승, 철근콘크리트 부재의 폭발해석을 위한 침식 기준, 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, Vol. 30, No. 3, p.p. 21-28, 2014

20.
FEMA 452, Risk Assessment, A how to guide to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings, Department of Veterans Affairs, 2005.

21.
Nadim. H. M and Akthem. A, Structural Concrete Theory and Design, Wiley, 4th edition, p.p. 333-351. 2008.

22.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TM 5-1300, Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions, U.S. Army corps of Engineers, Washington, D. C. 1990

23.
Bing L, Anand N, Qian K, Residual Axial Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Simulated Blast Damage, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 26, p. p. 287-299, 2012 crossref(new window)