JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Minimum Embedded Length of Hybrid Steel Coupling Beam
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Minimum Embedded Length of Hybrid Steel Coupling Beam
Lim, Woo-Young; Hong, Sung-Gul;
 
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to estimate the minimum embedded length of the hybrid steel coupling beam. Cyclic loading tests for six hybrid steel coupling beams were performed. Primary variables of the tests were the embedded length of the steel beam. Test results indicated that the embedded length of the steel beam and top - seat angles had influence on the shear strength and energy dissipation capacity of the hybrid steel coupling beam. Required embedded length of hybrid steel coupling beam was proposed. Minimum embedded length was expressed as function of concrete compressive strength and plastic shear strength of the steel coupling beam.
 Keywords
Hybrid steel coupling beam;Embedded length;Plastic shear strength;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
ACI 318-08 (2008). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, 203-367.

2.
Astaneh-Asl, A., McMullin, K. M., & Call, S. M. (1993). Behavior and Design of Steel Single Plate Shear Connections, Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(9), 2421-2440. crossref(new window)

3.
Gong, B., & Shahrooz B. M. (2001). Steel-Concrete Composite Coupling Beams-Behavior and Design, Engineering Structures, 23, 1480-1490. crossref(new window)

4.
Harries, K. A., Mitchell, D., Cook, W. D., & Redwood, R. G. (1993). Seismic Response of Steel Beams Coupling Concrete Walls, Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(12), 3611-3629. crossref(new window)

5.
Harries, K. A., Gong, G., & Shahrooz, B. M. (2000). Behavior and Design of Reinforced Concrete, Steel, and Steel-Concrete Coupling Beams, Earthquake Spectra, 16(4), 775-800. crossref(new window)

6.
Kent, D. C., & Park, R. (1971). Flexural Members with Confined Concrete, Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 97(7), 1969-1990.

7.
Korea Concrete Institute (2008). Concrete Design Code and Commentary, Kimoondang Publishing Company, Seoul, Korea.

8.
Korea Society of Steel Construction (2009). KBC 2009 Steel Structure Design, Goomiseokwan, 417.

9.
Marcakis, A. H. & Gaffar, G. H. (1980). Precast Concrete Connections with Embedded Steel Member, PCI Journal, 25(4), 88-116. crossref(new window)

10.
Mattock, A. H & Gaffar, G. H. (1982). Strength of Embedded Steel Sections as Brackets, ACI Journal, 79(9), 83-93.

11.
Minami, K. (1985). Beam to Column Stress Transfer in Composite Structures, Composite and Mixed Construction, C. Roeder, ed., ASCE, 216-226.

12.
Paulay, T., & Binney, J. R. (1974). Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams of Shear Walls, Special publication ACI, 42, Detroit, 579-589.

13.
Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute. (1999). PCI Design Handbook Precast and Prestressed Concrete, Fifth Edition, Chicago, Illinois.

14.
Shahrooz, B. M. (1993). Seismic Design and Performance of Composite Coupled Walls, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119(11), 3291-3309. crossref(new window)

15.
Song, H. B., & Yi, W. H. (2005). Embedded Length of Steel Coupling Beam in Coupled Shear Wall System, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 21(11), 43-50.

16.
Yoon, H. D., Park, W. S., Han, B. C., Hwang, S. K., Lee, J. Y., & Yi, W. H. (2004). Shear Strength of Steel Coupling Beams Connections Embedded in Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 20(5), 43-50.