JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
TAM3-based Analysis of the Differences in the Attitude toward FMS between User Groups by Experience in Higher Education Facilities
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
TAM3-based Analysis of the Differences in the Attitude toward FMS between User Groups by Experience in Higher Education Facilities
Uhm, Miyoung; Lee, Ghang;
 
 Abstract
The facility management solution (FMS) has recently been introduced to a number of higher education facilities; however, the actual use rates of FMS are still low. To identify the reasons for differences between FMS experienced and unexperienced in terms of FMS evaluation, a survey was conducted with 68 facility managers from three universities using 12 questions developed on the basis of technology acceptance model3 (TAM3). For statistical analysis of the resulting data was used. The survey results show that 64.9% of FMS users were not satisfied with FMS due to lack of information, while 83.3% evaluated FMS as complicated. However, 58.9% of users replied that FMS helped to improve task efficiency. Task efficiency improvement is not only the major expectation of FMS but also the major benefit of FMS as perceived by both users and non-users. The survey also highlighted statistical differences, with FMS users stressing on-the-job relevance as a factor in considering FMS adoption, and non-users expressing an interest in the expected effects of FMS. There were also differences between users and non-users in terms of users' attitudes and preferred assistance methods, with users indicating a more passive attitude than non-users. Finally, the results revealed a correlation between experiences of FMS and three factors (perceived job relevance, self-evaluation of the ability to operate new technology, and preferred assistance methods in the case of errors).
 Keywords
Technology acceptance model3(TAM3);Facility management system(FMS);Difference of user attitude;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Alsyouf, I. (2009). Maintenance practices in Swedish Industries: survey results, International Journal of Production Economics, 12(1), 212-223

2.
Archibus, Inc. (2015). Archibus, Retrieved December 2, 2014 from http://www.archibus.com/success-story-by-industry/section/Industry%20Success%20Stories/menuid/84

3.
Berger, D. (2009). 2009 CMMS/EAM review: power up a winner, Retrieved October 2, 2014 from www.plantservices.com/articles/ 2009/066.html

4.
Capterra Inc. (2015). Capterra - The Smart Way to Find Business Software, Retrieved January 25, 2015 from http://www.capterra.com/facility-management-software/

5.
Elmualim, A. & Pelumi, A. (2009). Application of computer-aided facilities management(CAFM) for intelligent buildings operation, Facilities, 27(11/12), 421-428 crossref(new window)

6.
Jagdish, S. (1981). Psychology of innovation resistance: The less developed concept (LDC) in diffusion research. Research in Marketing, 4(3), 273-282

7.
Jung, Y., Park. T., Kim, K., Kim, C., Kim, O., Hwang, Y., & Park, H. (2004). CAFM system development for alternative examination of rental apartment long-term maintenance, Proceeding of Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 24(1), 515-518

8.
Kang, D., Seong, Y., Kim, S., Yeo, M., Choi, J., & Kim, K. (2003). A study on the CAFM system planning strategy for the campus facility, Architectural Institute of Korea Planning and Design, 23(2), 973-976

9.
Keller, J. & Keller, C. (2005). Bring strategic efficacy to facility management through CAFM tools, Journal of Facility Management, 3(2), 125-144 crossref(new window)

10.
Kim, C. (2001). The functional characteristics of program module in computer-aided facility management system related to spatial performance evaluation, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea Planning and Design, 17(2), 57-66

11.
Kong, M. (2011). A study on the efficiency plan of facility management in university-focus on Dong-A University, Thesis, Dong-A University, 29-39

12.
Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Yeo, W. (2007). Data modeling for smart apartment facility management based on well-defined spatial information, Journal of the architectural institute of Korea, 23(11), 87-94

13.
Madritsch, T. & May, M. (2009). Successful IT Implementation in Facility Management, Facilities, 27(11/12), 429-444 crossref(new window)

14.
Ministry of Education (2014). Request for proposals of National University resource management system, Retrieved August 10, 2014 from http://www.g2b.go.kr/pt/

15.
Moore, A. (2006). Crossing the chasm: marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers, New York: Collins Business Essentials, 15-17

16.
Na, K. (2015). A study on users' satisfaction with the college facility management system and its reform measures-focused on the case of the space management by 'S' University, Thesis, Yonsei University, 55-91

17.
Parasuraman, V., Zeithaml, A., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research, Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50

18.
Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance, Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 208-212

19.
Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press, 5-7

20.
Saengratwatchara, S. & Elsworth, J. (2008). Antecedents of intention to adopt the web-based computer aided facility management system, Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36(4), 350-357 crossref(new window)

21.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, Information Management, 27(3), 425-478

22.
Wang, B., Wan, T., Burke, D., Bazzoli, G., & Lin, B. (2005). Factors influencing health information system adoption in American hospitals, Health Care Management Review, 30(1), 44-51 crossref(new window)