JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Sociological Understanding of Architecture and Architectural Activity - Architectural Sociology Approach Based on Symbolic Interactionism -
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Sociological Understanding of Architecture and Architectural Activity - Architectural Sociology Approach Based on Symbolic Interactionism -
Song, Jong-Eun; Park, Yong-Seo;
 
 Abstract
Symbolic Interactionism could be a useful theoretical basis for the sociological understanding about three themes derived from definitions of "architecture" and "architectural activity". The themes include 1)What is the meaning of social activity served by architecture, 2)What is the meaning of concretizing human being through symbolic forms and its relationship between human being and symbolic forms. and 3)How could architectural design be a process of self-understanding. The paper explores these themes in the topics of architectural sociology based on main concepts of Symbolic Interactionism. For this purpose, firstly, the paper outlines main concepts of the theory: symbol, objects, self & human behavior, secondly, discusses three topics related with these concepts in architectural sociology; 1)people, social behavior and material environment. 2)social space, space and social interaction, 3)architectural symbol, materiality and self. thirdly, summarize the sociological meaning of the definition of architecture and architectural activity, finally, the paper suggests the implication of Symbolic Interactionism to the architectural design thinking.
 Keywords
Symbolic Interactionism;Architectural Activity;Social Behavior;Symbolic Form;Self-Understanding;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Ankerl, Guy (1981). Experimental Sociology of Architecture, Mouton.

2.
Bugni, Valerie & Smith, Ronald W., Designed physical en vionments as related to selves, symbols, and social reality, Haumanity and Society, 26(4), 2002, p.p.293-311.

3.
Delitz, Heike (2009). Architektursoziologie. Transcript Verlag.

4.
Fischer, Joachim & Delitz, Heike (2009), Die Architektur der Gesellschaft, Transcript Verlag.

5.
Gagliardi, Pasquale(1996), Exploring the Aesthetic Side of Organizational Life, in S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord(eds), Handbook of Organization Studies. London:Sage Publications. p.p.701-725.

6.
Gieryn, Thomas F. (2000), A space for place in sociology, Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26, p.p. 463-496. crossref(new window)

7.
Gutman, Robert (1972), People and Buildings, Basic Books, Inc.

8.
Hatch, Mary Jo(1997), Organization theory, New York:Oxford University Press.

9.
Hillier, Bill (2008), Space and spatiality: what the built en vironment needs from social theory, Building Research & Information, 36:3, p.p.216-230. crossref(new window)

10.
Hillier, Bill & Hanson, Julienne (1984). The social logic of space, Cambridge University Press.

11.
Prior, Lindsay (1988), A study of spatial organization and medical knowledge, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 39, No. 1, p.p.86-113. crossref(new window)

12.
Schafer, Bernhard (2003). Architektursoziologie, VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.

13.
Simonsen, Kirsten (1996), What kind of space in what kind of social theory, Progress in Human Geography, Dec 1996; 20, p.p. 494 -512.

14.
Smith, Ronald W. & Bugni, Valerie (2006), Symbolic Inte raction Theory and Architecture, Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 29, p.p.123-155. crossref(new window)

15.
Sommer, Robert (1983), Social Design, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

16.
Weresch, Katharina (1993). Bibliografie zur Architektursoziologie.Peter Lang.

17.
Zeisel, John (1975). Sociology and Architectural Design, Russell Sage Foundation.

18.
김덕영(1999), 현대의 현상학-게오르그 짐멜연구, 나남출판

19.
김동원 외(2000), 현대사회학의 이해, 일신사

20.
앙리 르페브르/ 양여란 역(2011), 공간의 생산, 에코리브르

21.
앤소니 기든스/ 권기돈 역, 현대성과 자아정체성, 새물결, 1991

22.
어빙고프만/ 김병서 역(1987), 자아표현과 인상관리 -연극적 사회분석론, 경문사

23.
하버트 블루머/ 박영신 역(1982), 사회과학의 상징적 교섭론, 도서출판 까치 (원저: Blumer, Herbert(1969), Symbolic Interactionsm: Perspectives and Method, Berkeley: University of California Press)