JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Interworking between Physical and Digital Models for Performance-Oriented Design of Kinetic Building Components
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Interworking between Physical and Digital Models for Performance-Oriented Design of Kinetic Building Components
Jang, Do-Jin; Kim, Sung-Ah;
 
 Abstract
Kinetic building components, which respond to the changing environmental conditions or user demands, need different design process from traditional static building components. For performance-oriented design of kinetic building components with dynamic movements, interwoking between the physical model and the digital model via physical computing is advantageous. Even though the digital model can control the actuators of physical model in real-time, the two models cannot correspond with each other, due to physical conditions including material properties and the surrounding environment. For accurate evaluation performance, the shape and motion of physical model needs to be reflected in the digital model. This study aimed to devise a motion-capture-based system of interworking between physical and digital models. The motion-capture data of the physical model can be used for verification of the deviation between it and digital model and, based on its shape, for optimization of Kinetic building components operation.
 Keywords
Kinetic Building Components;Performance Based Design;Interworking between Physical Model and Digital Model;Motion Capture;Kinetic facade;Optimization;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
El-laithy, R. A., Huang, J., & Yeh, M. (2012, April). Study on the use of Microsoft Kinect for robotics applications. In Position Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), 2012 IEEE/ION IEEE. 1280-1288.

2.
Fabio, R. (2003). From point cloud to surface: the modeling and visualization problem. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34(5), W10.

3.
Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive architecture (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.

4.
Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press.

5.
Jang, S. Y., Lee, S., & Kim, S. A. (2013). Collaborative Responsive Facade Design Using Sensor and Actuator Network. In Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering (pp. 11-18). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

6.
Kim, S. A. (2015). Media and tool, View on pedagogy of architectural design, JUDGMENT OF ARCHITECTURE: ARCHITECTURAL CRITICS COMMUNITY, 3, 299-321, JEONGYE publishing Company.

7.
Kolarevic, B., & Malkawi, A. (Eds.). (2005). Peformative Architecture. Routledge.

8.
Kronenberg, R., Lim, J., & Chii, W. Y. (2003). Transportable Environments 2.

9.
Lee, I. K. (2013). Communication between BIM and Physical models for smart building design, MS Thesis, Sungkyunkwan University.

10.
Loonen, R. C. G. M. (2010). Climate adaptive building shells-What can we simulate. Afstudeerrapport, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.

11.
Maver, T. W. (1980). Appraisal in Design, in: Design Studies, 1(3), 160-165. crossref(new window)

12.
Moloney, J. (2011). Designing kinetics for architectural facades: state change. Taylor & Francis.

13.
O'Sullivan, D., & Igoe, T. (2004). Physical computing: sensing and controlling the physical world with computers. Course Technology Press.

14.
Oxman, R. (2008). Performance-based design: current practices and research issues. International journal of architectural computing, 6(1), 1-17. crossref(new window)

15.
Pan, C. A., & Jeng, T. (2010, August). A robotic and kinetic design for interactive architecture. In SICE Annual Conference 2010, Proceedings of IEEE, 1792-1796.

16.
Sharaidin, K., & Salim, F. (2012). Design considerations for adopting kinetic facades in building practice.

17.
Sharaidin, M. (2014). Kinetic facades: towards design for environmental performance, PhD Thesis, RMIT University.

18.
Shea, K., Aish, R., & Gourtovaia, M. (2003, September). Towards integrated performance-based generative design tools. In eCAADe 03, 21st Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Graz, Graz University of Technology, 553-560.

19.
Zarzycki, A. (2014). Reflections on Computational Design Through Interactions With Materiality and Physical Mock-Ups. Journal of Architectural Education, 68(1), 94-103. crossref(new window)