JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
How Visibility Related Physical Elements of Street affects Burglary? - in Low-rise Residential areas -
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
How Visibility Related Physical Elements of Street affects Burglary? - in Low-rise Residential areas -
Gu, Tae-Yeon; Jang, Kyung-Ran; Lee, Myung-Sik; Jung, Sung-Won;
 
 Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the effects of street-level visibility on the occurrence of burglaries in multi-family and multi-unit housing areas and provide an evidence-based understanding that would be useful in predicting future crime at finer scales than are usually considered in previous studies. For this, streets in the multi-family and multi-unit housing areas in Seoul, were set as the basic units of analysis, and data on burglaries in the area over 12 month period in 2010 were collected. Considering building, street, spatial and behavior characteristics of street components as independent variables to explain street-level visibility, we carry out visibility graph analysis (VGA), field survey and pedestrian volume counting. The results from multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrate that it is connectivity, volume of pedestrian, rate of the front entrance and visual control that have positive effects on burglary rates, while Integration, whether the CCTV, average of the window and clustering coefficient have negative effects. We discuss further how these empirical results can shed new light on crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) principles as well as on our understanding of burglary behaviors in multi-family and multi-unit housing areas.
 Keywords
CPTED;Environment design;Crime prediction;Crime safety;Visibility;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Abdullah, A., Marzbali, M. H., & Tilaki, M. J. M. (2013). Predicting the influence of CPTED on perceived neighbourhood cohesion: Considering differences across age. Journal of environmental psychology, 36, 54-64. crossref(new window)

2.
Baran, P. K., Smith, W. R., & Toker, U. (2007). The space and crime: Evidence from a suburban community. 6th International space syntax symposium.

3.
Chang, D. (2009). Social crime or spatial crime? Exploring the effects of social, economical, and spatial factors on burglary rates. Environment and behavior.

4.
Choi, Y., & Kang, I. (1993). Spatial structure of crime in apartment sites. Journal of architectural institute of Korea, 58('93.8), 25-33.

5.
Choi, J., & Jo, H. (2010). A study on the form-element of buildings affecting in street spaces. Journal of the Korean association of geographic information studies, 13(1), 16-27.

6.
Desyllas J., Connoly, P., & Hebbert, F. (2003). Modelling natural surveillance. Environment and planning B, 30(5), 643-656. crossref(new window)

7.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage publications.

8.
Foster, S., Giles-Corti, B., & Knuiman, M. (2011). Creating safe walkable streetscapes: Does house design and up keep discourage incivilities in suburban neighbourhoods?. Journal of environmental psychology, 31(1), 79-88. crossref(new window)

9.
Greenberg, S. W., Rohe, W. M., & Williams, J. R. (1982). Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Population and environment, 5(3), 141-165. crossref(new window)

10.
Hillier, B. (2003). The knowledge that shapes the city: the human city beneath the social city. 4th International space syntax symposium.

11.
Hillier, B. (2004). Can streets be made safe?. Urban design international, 9(1), 31-45. crossref(new window)

12.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge university press.

13.
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement-or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and planning B, 20(1), 29-66. crossref(new window)

14.
Hillier, B., & Shu, S. (2000). 12. Crime and urban layout: The need for evidence. Secure foundations: Key issues in crime prevention, Crime reduction and community safety, 224.

15.
Jacobs, J (1961). The death and life of great American cities, NewYork, Vintage Books.

16.
Jang, K. R. (2014). A study of the correlation between visibility-related street components and residential burglaries in multi-family & multi-unit housing areas. Sejong university.

17.
Lockwood, D. (2007). Mapping crime in Savannah social disadvantage, land use, and violent crimes reported to the police. Social science computer review, 25(2), 194-209. crossref(new window)

18.
Minnery, J. R., & Lim, B. (2005). Measuring crime prevention through environmental design. Journal of architectural and planning research, 22(4), 330-341.

19.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York: Macmillan.

20.
Park, H. H., Oh, G. S., & Paek, S. Y. (2012). Measuring the crime displacement and diffusion of benefit effects of open-street CCTV in South Korea. International journal of law, Crime and justice, 40(3), 179-191. crossref(new window)

21.
Reis, A. T., Dutra, M., & Zago, G. (2013). Effects of some segments features on residential crime in two boroughs. 9th International space syntax symposium.

22.
Takizawa, A. (2013). Emerging pattern based street crime analysis. Journal of environmental engineering, 78(686), 957-967. crossref(new window)

23.
Takizawa, A., Koo, W., & Katoh, N. (2010). Discovering distinctive spatial patterns of snatch theft in Kyoto city with CAEP, Journal of asian architecture and building engineering, 9(1), 103-110. crossref(new window)

24.
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 28(1), 103-121.

25.
Wu, L., Liu, X., Ye, X., Leipnik, M., Lee, J., & Zhu, X. (2015). Permeability, space syntax, and the patterning of residential burglaries in urban China. Applied geography, 60, 261-265. crossref(new window)