JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Risk Performance Measurement System for the Mega-Project
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Architectural research
  • Volume 12, Issue 1,  2010, pp.57-64
  • Publisher : Architectural Institute of Korea
  • DOI : 10.5659/AIKAR.2010.12.1.57
 Title & Authors
A Risk Performance Measurement System for the Mega-Project
Kim, Seon-Gyoo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In recent years, interests and studies on the urban regeneration projects have been increased and largely conducted. It is a part of the effort that solves some social and economical problems occurred by deteriorated buildings and degraded infrastructures through new urban regeneration projects or redevelopment projects. However, the urban regeneration projects show the characteristics that can not guarantee in the project performance because the projects have various and complex stakeholders related to these projects and are exposed to lots of risks due to its huge scale. This study proposed the risk performance index method to improve the efficiency of the overall performance measurement for a mega-project by extending from the traditional cost/schedule based performance measurement system. The risk performance index method proposed in this study has a similar system to the EVMS, and makes possible to perform a three dimensional integrated performance measurement in cost/schedule/risk through 18 different indexes that compose the risk performance index.
 Keywords
Risk Management;Performance Index;Performance Measurement;Mega-Project;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
CII (2004) "Benchmarking & Metrics Implementation Toolkit." Construction Industry Institute, 2004

2.
Department of Energy, "Earned Value Management System", U.S. Department of Energy

3.
Fleming, Q. W. and Koppleman, J. M. (1996) "Earned Value Project Management", Project Management Institute, 1996

4.
Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N. and Rothengatter, W. (2003), "Megaprojects and Risk-An Anatomy of Ambition", Cambridge University Press, 2003

5.
Kang, M. J. Kim, J. H. and Ha, J. M. (2008) "Development of Indicators Evaluating the Level of Blight in Commercial Zones for Urban Regeneration." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 2008.2, 227-235

6.
Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1993) "Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work", Harvard Business Review, 1993

7.
The KPI Working Group (2000) "KPI Report for the Minister for Construction", Department of the Environment, Transportation and the Regions, UK, 2000