JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
IFC-Based Computational Support Tool for Managing and Using Design Planning Information: Case Application and Evaluation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Architectural research
  • Volume 13, Issue 2,  2011, pp.3-12
  • Publisher : Architectural Institute of Korea
  • DOI : 10.5659/AIKAR.2011.13.2.3
 Title & Authors
IFC-Based Computational Support Tool for Managing and Using Design Planning Information: Case Application and Evaluation
Seo, Jong-Cheol; Kim, In-Han;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Planning information generated during initial architectural design phases significantly influences subsequent phases, and is implemented into architectural design models during the design process. However, failures to manage and use planning information in Korean design offices remain common. Current design tools that incorporate planning information also do not address the issue of interoperability during the life cycles of buildings. To address these problems, the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) extension model was developed to accommodate the need to manage and use planning information for cooperation between design offices carrying out multidisciplinary tasks. This paper introduces a purpose-built software tool that implements the IFC model and demonstrates the efficiency of the proposed method with the software tool.
 Keywords
Design Model;Planning Information;Industry Foundation Classes (IFC);IFC Extension Model;Pm-DPIMS;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Boddy, S., et al. (2007) "Knowledge informed decision making in the building lifecycle: an application to the design of a water drainage system." Automation in Construction, 16, 596-606. crossref(new window)

2.
BuildingSMART. (2010) (http://www.buildingsmart.com/content/buildingsmart_international) .

3.
BuildingSMART. (2011) "IFC releases published by buildingSMART." (http://www.iai-tech.org/products/ifc_specification/ifcreleases/summary) .

4.
Choi, Y., Yi, J., and Bae, J. (2006) "A study on selecting key factors of design management considering current situation of design process." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 22(10), 111-118.

5.
Cooper, G., et al. (2005) "Tracking decision-making during architectural design." Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 10, 125-139.

6.
Gallaher, M., et al. (2004) "Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the U.S." Technical Report, Capital Facilities Industry, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

7.
Hitchcock, R. (1996) Improving life-cycle information management through documentation of project objectives and design rationale. PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

8.
Hong, S., and Song, S. (2002) "A study on the characteristics of communications during design process in large architectural firms." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 18(7), 35-42.

9.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2002) "Industrial automation systems and integration: Product data representation and exchange: Part 21: Implementation methods: Clear text encoding of the exchange structure." TC 184/SC 4, Geneva, Switzerland.

10.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). (2009) "Design Intent Tool." (http://ateam.lbl.gov/DesignIntent/home.html) .

11.
Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM). (2009) "Applying Standard of Construction Information Classification System." 2009-781.

12.
Ozkaya, I., and Akin, O. (2007) "Tool support for computer-aided requirement traceability in architectural design: the case of DesignTrack." Automation in Construction, 16, 674-684. crossref(new window)

13.
Roy, B. (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

14.
Seo, J., and Kim, I. (2009) "Industry Foundation Classes-based approach for managing and using the design model and planning information in the architectural design." Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 8(2), 431-438. crossref(new window)

15.
Shin, J., et al. (2006) "Introducing information-oriented work process modeling method for effective design management in design collaboration." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 22(8), 181-188.

16.
Trelligence Co., Ltd. (2010) "Affinity overview." (http://www.trelligence.com/affinity_overview.php) .

17.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2010) "Facility Compuser." (https://ff.cecer.army.mil/fc) .

18.
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. (2009) "Requirements management - EcoProP." (http://cic.vtt.fi/eco/ecoprop/english/EcoProp_brochure.pdf) .