JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Bondline Strength Evaluation of Honeycomb Sandwich Panel For Cure Process and Moisture Absorption
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Bondline Strength Evaluation of Honeycomb Sandwich Panel For Cure Process and Moisture Absorption
Choe, Heung-Seop; Jeon, Heung-Jae; Nam, Jae-Do;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this paper, through a series of comparative experiments, effects of two different cure processing methods, cocure and precure, on the mechanical properties of honeycomb core materials for aircraft applications are considered. Mass of moisture accumulated into the closed cells of the sandwich panel specimen from the measured mass of moisture diffused to the full saturation state into the elements(skin, adhesive layer, Nomex honeycomb), consisting the honeycomb sandwich specimen has been calculated. Water reservoir of 70 was used to have specimens absorb moisture to see the influence of moisture absorbed into sandwich panel on its mechanical properties. For the repair condition holding for 2 hours at 177(350℉) temperature, a pressure due to the vapor expansion in each cell of the sandwich panel, which may result in the local separation of the interface between laminated skin and the surface of the honeycomb, has been estimated by vapor pressure-temperature relation from the thermodynamic steam table and compared to the pressure from the ideal gas state equation. The bonding strengths of the laminated skins on the flat surface of the Nomex honeycomb have been compared by the flatwise tension test and climbing drum peel test performed at room temperature for dry, wet and wet-repair specimens, respectively.
 Keywords
Nomex Honeycomb;Cocure;Precure;Moisture Absorption;Composite;Repair;Bondline Strength;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Vinson, J.R., 1999, The Behavior of Sandwich Structures of Isotropic and Composite Materials, Technomic Pub

2.
Niu, M.C.Y., 1992, Composite Airframe Structures-Practical Design Information and Data, Hong Kong Conmilit Press

3.
Douglas Aircraft Company, 1977, Core Material: Aromatic Polyamide Paper/Phenolic Resin, DMS1974, DAC

4.
박인경, 안영선, 남재도, 최홍섭, 1999, '복합재료/하니콤 샌드위치 구조물의 반복충격에 의한 손상 연구,' 한국고분자학회 99' 춘계학술대회 초록집

5.
엄용성, 정정화, 안규종, Seferis, J.C., 1994, 'Cocure 공정용 프리프레그의 특성분석,' 한국복합재료학회, 94' 추계학술발표대회 논문집, 서울대학교

6.
Armstrong, K.B. and Barret, R.T., 1998, Care and Repair of Advanced Composites, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc

7.
Yosomiya, R. & Morimoto, K. etal., 1990, Adhesion and Bonding in Composites, Marcel Dekker

8.
Choi, H.S., Ahn, K.J., Chun, H.J. and Nam, J.D., Sep. 2000, 'Hygroscopic Aspects of Epoxy/Carbon Fiber Composite Laminates in Aircraft Environments,' Accepted for Publication at Composites PartA crossref(new window)

9.
Weibel, Nicolas 1996, Close Cell Thermoplastic Sandwich Core Foam Material For Radome Application; Comparative Study between: AIREX R82.110, ROHACELL 71HF and DIVINYCELL HT90(Performed by Korean Air-EPFL co-work), Diploma Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne

10.
Walton, J.D., 1970, Radome Engineering Handbook-Design and Principles, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

11.
Garrett, R.A., Bohlmann, R.E. and Derby, E.A., 1978, 'Analysis and Test of Graphite/Epoxy Sandwich Panels Subjected to Internal Pressures Resulting from Absorbed Moisture,' Advanced Composite Materials-Environmental Effects, ASTM STP 658, pp. 234-253

12.
Brayden, T.H., Ayres, T.K. and Darrow, D.C., 1989, 'Estimation of Adsorbed Moisture Using a Freundlich Adsorption Isotherm,' 34th International SAMPE Symposium, pp. 1385-1394

13.
최흥섭, 유원재, Lanz, R., 전흥재, 남재도, 'Repair Characteristics of Honeycomb Panels with Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composite Skins for Structure Usage,' 한국복합재료학회, 98' 추계학술발표대회 논문집, 건국대학교

14.
하종민, 최흥섭, 정기모, 안규종, 1995, 환경변화에 따른 H/C 샌드위치 구조물의 특성분석, 한국복합재료학회, 95' 춘계학술발표대회 논문집, 충남대학교

15.
Standard Test Method for Flatwise Tensile Strength of Sandwich Constructions, Annual Book of ASTM D297-94

16.
Standard Test Method for Flatwise Compressive Properties of Sandwich Cores, Annual Book of ASTM C365-94

17.
Standard Test Method for Climbing Drum Peel Adhesives, Annual Book of ASTM D1781-93

18.
Douglas Aircraft Company, 1989, Carbon Epoxy Prepreg-Impact Resistant, $350^{\circ}F$ Cure, DMS2224, DAC

19.
Douglas Aircraft Company, 1989, $250^{\circ}F$ Service Application, DMS2177, DAC

20.
Renn, DJ., Tulleau, T. and Seferis, J.C., Curran, R.N. and Ahn, K.J., Oct. 1995, 'Composite Honeycomb Core Crush in Relation to Internal Pressure Measurement,' Journal of Advanced Materials, pp. 31-40

21.
Van Wylen, G.J. and Sonntag, R.E., 1986, Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics, 3rd Ed., Wiley