JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Development of a Similarity Evaluation System for Offshore Plants` 3D Piping CAD Models Created Using Aveva Marine and SmartMarine 3D
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Development of a Similarity Evaluation System for Offshore Plants` 3D Piping CAD Models Created Using Aveva Marine and SmartMarine 3D
Lee, Jaesun; Kim, Byung Chul; Kim, Hyungki; Cheon, Sanguk; Cho, Mincheol; Lee, Gwang; Kim, Jin-Hyun; Mun, Duhwan; Han, Soonhung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Diverse stakeholders engaged in design, construction, and operation and maintenance of offshore plants typically operate heterogeneous plant 3D CAD systems. Engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) companies are required to submit plant design result to the owner in the form of a plant 3D CAD model, as specified in the contract. However, because of the limitations of data interface of plant 3D CAD systems, EPC companies frequently perform manual remodeling to fulfill the terms and conditions of the contract. Therefore, comparison should be performed between the source plant 3D CAD model and the remodeled plant 3D CAD model to prove the validity of the remodeled plant 3D CAD model. To automate the comparison process, we have developed a system for quantitatively assessing the similarity of the plant 3D CAD models. This paper presents the architecture and detailed functions of the system. In addition, experimental results using this system are explained.
 Keywords
3D Design;Aveva Marine;Evaluation Metrics;Offshore Plant;SmartMarine 3D;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
PARTSolutions, 2014, http://partsolutions.com/.

2.
ENOVIA Live Similarity, 2014, http://www.3ds.com/.

3.
Geolus Search, 2014, http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/.

4.
Aveva Marine, 2014, http://www.aveva.com/.

5.
SmartMarine 3D, 2014, http://www.intergraph.com/

6.
Tangelder, J.W. and Veltkamp, R.C., 2008, "A Survey of Content Based 3D Shape Retrieval Methods," Multimedia tools and applications, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 441-471. crossref(new window)

7.
Iyer, N., Jayanti, S., Lou, K., Kalyanaraman, Y. amd Ramani, K., 2005, "Three-dimensional Shape Searching: State-of-the-art Review and Future Trends," Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 509-530. crossref(new window)

8.
Paquet, E., Rioux, M., Murching, A., Naveen, T. and Tabatabai, A., 2000, "Description of Shape Information for 2-D and 3-D Objects," Signal Processing: Image Communication, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 103-122.

9.
Ramesh, M., Yip-Hoi, D., Dutta, D., 2001, "Feature Based Shape Similarity Measurement for Retrieval of Mechanical Parts," Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 245-256. crossref(new window)

10.
El-Mehalawi, M., Miller, R.A., 2003, "A Database System of Mechanical Components Based on Geometric and Topological Similarity Part I: Representation," Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 83-94. crossref(new window)

11.
Horn, B.K.P., 1984, "Extended Gaussian Images," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 72, No. 12, pp. 1671-1686. crossref(new window)

12.
Herrmann, J.W. and Singh, G., 1997, Design Similarity Measures for Process Planning and Design Evaluation, MARYLAND UNIV COLLEGE PARK DEPT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING.

13.
Rodriguez, M.A. and Egenhofer, M.J., 2003, "Determining Semantic Similarity Among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 442-456. crossref(new window)

14.
Alizon, F., Shooter, S.B. and Simpson, T.W., 2006, "Reuse of Manufacturing Knowledge to Facilitate Platform-based Product Realization," Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 170-178. crossref(new window)

15.
Mun, D. and Ramani, K., 2011, "Knowledge-based Part Similarity Measurement Utilizing Ontology and Multi-criteria Decision Making Technique," Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 119-130. crossref(new window)

16.
Osada, R., Funkhouse, T., Chazelle, B. and Dobkin, D., 2002, "Shape Distributions," ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 807-832. crossref(new window)

17.
Ohbuchi, R., Minamitani, T. and Takei, T., "Shape-similarity Search of 3D Models by Using Enhanced Shape Functions," International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 23, No. 2-4, pp. 70-85.

18.
Tangelder, J. W. and Veltkamp, R.C., 2003, "Polyhedral Model Retrieval Using Weighted Point Sets," International journal of image and graphics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 209-229. crossref(new window)

19.
Hwang, T.J., Lee, K., Oh, H.Y. and Jeong, J.H., 2004, "Shape Similarity Measurement Using Ray Distances for Mass Customization," Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, pp. 279-284.

20.
Ip, C.Y., Lapadat, D., Sieger, L. and Regli, W.C., 2002, "Using Shape Distributions to Compare Solid Models," Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, pp. 273-280.

21.
Cheng, H., Lo, C., Chu, C. and Kim, Y., 2011, "Shape Similarity Measurement for 3D Mechanical Part Using D2 Shape Distribution and Negative Feature Decomposition," Computers in Industry, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 269-280. crossref(new window)

22.
Chu, C.H. and Hsu, Y.C., 2006, "Similarity Assessment of 3D Mechanical Components for Design Reuse," Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 332-341. crossref(new window)