JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Developing an Accident Model for Rural Signalized Intersections Using a Random Parameter Negative Binomial Method
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Developing an Accident Model for Rural Signalized Intersections Using a Random Parameter Negative Binomial Method
PARK, Min Ho; LEE, Dongmin;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study dealt with developing an accident model for rural signalized intersections with random parameter negative binomial method. The limitation of previous count models(especially, Poisson/Negative Binomial model) is not to explain the integrated variations in terms of time and the distinctive characters a specific point/segment has. This drawback of the traditional count models results in the underestimation of the standard error(t-value inflation) of the derived coefficient and finally affects the low-reliability of the whole model. To solve this problem, this study improves the limitation of traditional count models by suggesting the use of random parameter which takes account of heterogeneity of each point/segment. Through the analyses, it was found that the increase of traffic flow and pedestrian facilities on minor streets had positive effects on the increase of traffic accidents. Left turning lanes and median on major streets reduced the number of accidents. The analysis results show that the random parameter modeling is an effective method for investigating the influence on traffic accident from road geometries. However, this study could not analyze the effects of sequential changes of driving conditions including geometries and safety facilities.
 Keywords
accident analysis;heterogeneity;marginal effect;random parameter negative binomial;rural intersection;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Bhat C. (2003), Simulation Estimation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models Using Randomized and Scrambles Halton sequences, Transportation Research Part B, 37(1), 837-855. crossref(new window)

2.
Chin H. C., Quddus M. A. (2003), Applying the Random Effect Negative Binomial Model to Examine Traffic Accident Occurrence at Signalized Intersections, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 253-259. crossref(new window)

3.
Engel J. (1984), Models for Response Data Showing Extra-Poisson Variation, Statistica Neerlandica, 38(3), 159-167. crossref(new window)

4.
Greene W. (2007), Limdep, Version 9.0. Econometric Software Inc., Plainview, NY.

5.
Highway Safety Manual Knowledge Base, NCHRP 17-27(2009).

6.
Joshua S. C., Garber N. J. (1990) Estimating Truck Accident Rate and Involvements Using Linear and Poisson Regression Models, Transportation Planning and Technology, 15(1), 41-58. crossref(new window)

7.
Jovanis P. P., Chang H. L. (1986), Modeling the Relationship of Accidents to Miles Traveled, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1068, 42-51.

8.
Lee G. H., Park M. H., Roh J. H. (2014), Random Parameter Negative Binomial Models of Interstate Accident Frequencies on Interchange Segment by Interchange Type/Region, International Journal of Highway Engineering,16(5), 133-142. crossref(new window)

9.
Lord D., Washington S., Ivan J. (2007), Further Notes on the Application of Zero Inflated Models in Highway Safety, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(1), 53-57. crossref(new window)

10.
Maher M. (1991), A New Bivariate Negative Binomial Model for Accident Frequencies, Traffic Engineering and Control, 32(9), 422-433.

11.
Miaou S. (1994), The Relationship Between Truck Accidents and Geometric Design of Road Sections: Poisson Versus Negative Binomial Regressions, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(4), 471-482. crossref(new window)

12.
Milton J., Shankar V., Mannering F. (2008), Highway Accident Severities and the Mixed Logit Model: an Exploratory Empirical Analysis, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(1), 260-266. crossref(new window)

13.
Park M. H. (2013), Relationship Between Interstate Highway Accidents and Heterogeneous Geometrics by Random Parameter Negative Binomial Model-A Case of Interstate Highway in Washington State, USA, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 33(6), 2437-2445. crossref(new window)

14.
Shankar V. N., Albin R. B., Milton J. C., Mannering F. L. (1998), Evaluating Median Cross-Over Likelihoods with Clustered Accident Counts: An Empirical Inquiry Using Random Effects Negative Binomial, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1635, 44-48.

15.
Shankar V., Mannering F., Barfield W. (1995), Effect of Roadway Geometrics and Environmental Factors on Rural Freeway Accident Frequencies, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27(3), 542-555.

16.
Shankar V., Milton J., Mannering F. (1997), Modeling Accident Frequencies as Zero-Altered Probability Processes: An Empirical Inquiry, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(6), 829-837. crossref(new window)

17.
Stamatiadis N., Hedges A., Kirk A. (2015), A Simulation-based Approach in Determining Permitted Left-turn Capacities, Transportation Research Part C(online version). crossref(new window)

18.
Train K. (1997), Mixed logit models for recreation demand, In: King, C., Herriges. J.(Eds), Valuing the Environment Using Recreation Demand Models, Elgar Press, New York.

19.
Venkataraman N. S., Ulfarsson G. F., Shankar V. N., Oh J., Park M. (2011), Model of Relationship Between Interstate Crash Occurrence and Geometrics - Exploratory Insights from Random Parameter Negative Binomial Approach, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2236, 41-48.

20.
Washington S., Karlaftis M., Mannering F. (2010), Statistical and Econometric Models for Transportation Data Analysis, Chapman Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.