JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Chemical Composition of Nut Material on the Fracture Behavior in Nut Projection Welding of Hot-Stamped Steel Sheet
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Journal of Welding and Joining
  • Volume 34, Issue 2,  2016, pp.1-10
  • Publisher : The Korean Welding and Joining Society
  • DOI : 10.5781/JWJ.2016.34.2.1
 Title & Authors
Effect of Chemical Composition of Nut Material on the Fracture Behavior in Nut Projection Welding of Hot-Stamped Steel Sheet
Lim, Sung-Sang; Kim, Young-Tae; Chun, Eun-Joon; Nam, Ki-Sung; Park, Young-Wan; Kim, Jae-Wan; Lee, Sun-Young; Choi, Il-dong; Park, Yeong-Do;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The use of materials for modern lightweight auto-bodies is becoming more complex than hitherto assemblies. The high strength materials nowadays frequently used for more specific fields such as the front and rear sub frames, seat belts and seats are mounted to the assembled body structure using bolt joints. It is desirable to use nuts attached to the assembled sheets by projection welding to decrease the number of loose parts which improves the quality. In this study, nut projection welding was carried out between a nut of both boron steel and carbon steel and ultra-high strength hot-stamped steel sheets. Then, the joints were characterized by optical and scanning electron microscope. The mechanical properties of the joints were evaluated by microhardness measurements and pullout tests. An indigenously designed sample fixture set-up was used for the pull-out tests to induce a tensile load in the weld. The fractography analysis revealed the dominant interfacial fracture between boron steel nut weld which is related to the shrinkage cavity and small size fusion zone. A non-interfacial fracture was observed in carbon steel nut weld, the lower hardness of HAZ caused the initiation of failure and allowed the pull-out failure which have higher in tensile strengths and superior weldability. Hence, the fracture load and failure mode characteristics can be considered as an indication of the weldability of materials in nut projection welding.
 Keywords
Nut projection welding;Hot stamped steel;Carbon steel nut;Boron steel nut;Failure mode;Shrinkage cavity;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Jin-Woo Lee, Myoung-Gye Lee, Forming Technology in Advanced High Strength Steels, Journal of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 36(3) (2014), 33-38 (in Korean)

2.
H. Karbasian, A.E. Tekkaya, A review on hot stamping. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210(15) (2010), 2103-2118 crossref(new window)

3.
E. tolf, J.hedegard, Resistance Nut Welding, Improving the Weldability and Joint Properties of Ultra High Strength Steels, Welding in the World, 51(3) (2007), 28-36 crossref(new window)

4.
M. Pouranvari, S.P.H. Marashi, Failure mode Transition in AHSS Resistance spot welds. Part I. Controlling factors, Materials Science and Engineering, A, 528(29) (2011), 8337-8343 crossref(new window)

5.
M. I. Khan, M. L. Kuntz, Y. Zhou, Effects of weld microstructure on static and impact performance of resistance spot welded joints in advanced high strength steels, Science and Technology of Welding & Joining, 13(3) (2008), 294-304 crossref(new window)

6.
X. Sun, E. V. Stephens, M. A. Khaleel, Effects of fusion zone size and failure mode on peak load and energy absorption of advanced high strength steel spot welds under lap shear loading conditions, Engineering Failure Analysis, 15(4) (2008), 356-367 crossref(new window)

7.
Sang-Soon Park, Young-Min Choi, Dae-Geun Nam, Youngeok Kim, Ji-Hun Yu, Yeong-Do Park, Evaluation of Resistance Spot Weld Interfacial Fractures in Tensile-Shear Tests of TRIP 1180 Steels, Journal of KWJS, 26(6) (2008), 81-91 (in Korean)

8.
AWS D8.9M,2012, Test Methods for Evaluating the Resistance Spot Welding Behavior of Automotive Sheet Steel Materials, 91-99

9.
H. Oikawa, T. Sakiyama, T. Ishikawa, G. Murayama, Y. Takahashi, Resistance Spot Weldability of High Strength Steel(HSS) Sheets for Automobiles, NSC Technical Bulletin, No. 385 2006, 36 (in Japanese)

10.
C. Ma, D. L. Chen, S. D. Bhole, G. Boudreau, A. Lee, E. Biro, Microstructure and fracture characteristics of spot-welded DP600 steel, Materials Science and Engineering, A, 485(1) (2008), 334-346 crossref(new window)

11.
A. Joaquin, A. N. A. Elliott, C. Jiang: Reducing Shrinkage Voids in Resistance Spot Welds, WELDING JOURNALNEW YORK, 86(2) (2007), 24-27

12.
M. Pouranvari, S. P. H, Marashi, Key factors influencing mechanical performance of dual phase steel resistance spot welds, Science and Technology of Welding & Joining, 15(2) (2010), 149-155 crossref(new window)

13.
M. Marya, X. Q. Gayden, Development of Requirements for Resistance Spot Welding Dual-Phases(DP600) Steels Part 1- The Causes of Interfacial Fracture, Welding Journal, 84(11) (2005), 172-182

14.
X. Sun, E. V. Stephens, R. W. Davies, M. A. Khaleel, D. J. Spinella, Effects of Fusion Zone Size on Failure Modes and Static Strength of Aluminum Resistance Spot Welds, Welding Journal, 83(11) (2004), 188-195