Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparisons of the corporate credit rating model power under various conditions
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparisons of the corporate credit rating model power under various conditions
Ha, Jeongcheol; Kim, Soojin;
  PDF(new window)
This study aims to compare the model power in developing corporate credit rating models and to suggest a good way to build models based on the characteristic of data. Among many measurement methods, AR is used to measure the model power under various conditions. SAS/MACRO is in use for similar repetitions to reduce time to build models under several combination of conditions. A corporate credit rating model is composed of two sub-models; a credit scoring model and a default prediction model. We verify that the latter performs better than the former under various conditions. From the result of size comparisons, models of large size corporate are more powerful and more meaningful in financial viewpoint than those of small size corporate. As a corporate size gets smaller, the gap between sub-models becomes huge and the effect of outliers becomes serious.
AR;corporate credit rating model;financial model;SAS/MACRO;
 Cited by
방향성 공간적 조건부 자기회귀 모형의 베이즈 분석 방법,경민정;

Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society, 2016. vol.27. 5, pp.1133-1146 crossref(new window)
Bayesian analysis of directional conditionally autoregressive models, Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society, 2016, 27, 5, 1133  crossref(new windwow)
Berry, M. J. A. and Linoff, G. (1997). Data mining techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Choi, J., Kwon, K. and Kim, S. (2002). Credit scoring model, Sechang Pub., Seoul.

Chung, H. (2008). A comparison of statistical methods for the improvement of credit rating models, Master Thesis, Keimyung University, Daegu.

Hong, C. and Lee, N. (2013). Class homogeneous tests with correlation. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Society, 24, 73-83. crossref(new window)

Kang, H., Han, S., Choi, J., Kim, E. and Kim, M. (2001). Data minig with SAS Enterprise Miner 4.0, Freeacademy, Seoul.

Kim, I. (2005). Credit evaluation, Korea Banking Institute, Seoul.

Kim, T. and Kim, Y. (2013). A study on the analysis of customer loan for the credit finance company using classification model. Journal of Korean Data & Information Society, 24, 411-425. crossref(new window)

Lee, E. (2003). Decision tree approach for small enterprise credit evaluation model, Master Thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.

Park, Y., Hong, C. and Lim, H. (2009). Criterion of test statistics for validation in credit rating model. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 16, 239-247. crossref(new window)

Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S. and Koch, G. G. (2000). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.