JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Semiotics analysis of Saussure, Peirce, and Myth of Barthes Focused on the film 'Veteran'
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Journal of Digital Convergence
  • Volume 13, Issue 11,  2015, pp.1-6
  • Publisher : The Society of Digital Policy and Management
  • DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2015.13.11.1
 Title & Authors
Semiotics analysis of Saussure, Peirce, and Myth of Barthes Focused on the film 'Veteran'
Kim, Man-Ki;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study is based on semiotic analysis with a focus on film 'Veteran'. The film is to the reproduced movie in the sign for social problems facing our society. The purpose of this study is to interpreted the implication is that referents and presents of the film to be directed by semiotic. The methodology is the study that the Saussure's semiology as a signifier and signified, and Peirce's semiotic as iconic, index, symbols in contemporary scholars. The Semiotics is analyzed on the basis myth and ideology of Barth. The film director thinks the 'veteran' was replaced by the implications of the role of the actor as a signifier that is the out referent of our society. Thus, the film was sublimated into more than the real as myth in our society desires. So, our society is to implement the right ideas as ideologies process. that is, rewarding the good and punishing the evil, and eventually implement justice society. The implications of this study is going to create a society that is not for specific groups tycoon, is for mutual dependence like the interpretation of the song of the film veteran.
 Keywords
Semiotics;signifier;signified;denotation;connotation;myth;ideology;film 'Veteran';
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Marita Sturken & Lisa Cartwright. "Practices of Looking", New York: Oxford University Press, p. 12, 14, 2009.

2.
Marita Sturken & Lisa Cartwright. "Practices of Looking", New York: Oxford University, 2009, 윤태진.허헌주.문경원 옮김, "영상문화이해", 커뮤니케이션북스, p. 10, 2009.

3.
Jeong-Soon Park, "Advertising semiotics", Communication Books, 2007, p.17 quoted in Umberto Eco (in 'social life as a sign ststem'in structralism: an introduction, palsdin press, Oxford, 1973.

4.
Gyeong-Yong Kim, "What is semiotics? "Minumsa Co., p.11, 168, 238, 1995.

5.
Jeong-Soon Park, "Media Semiotics", Nanam Publisher, 2008.

6.
Jeong-Soon Park, "Media Semiotics, Communication Books, 2009.

7.
Guiraud, Pierre," Semiology", London : Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975.

8.
Roland Barthes. "Mythology, translated by Annette Lavers, N.Y. : Hill and Wang, p.109, 1972.

9.
Man-Ki Kim, "Image Culture and Communication, Korea Research Information Co., 2008

10.
Man-Ki Kim, "Political Advertising and Public Relations Theory and Practice", Nam Seoul National University press, p. 451, 2012.

11.
Wollen, Peter, "Signs and meaning in the cinema,"bloomington: In diana university press, 1972.

12.
Metz, Christian, "Film Language : A Semiotic of the Cinema", (trans. Michael Taylor. New York : Oxford University Press, 1974.

13.
http://www.cine21.com/news/view/group/M201/mag_id/

14.
http://www.kin.naver.com/qna/detailYWM656RI

15.
James Monaco, "How to Read a Film", Oxford : Oxford University Press, p.128. 1977.