JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Research on Pecking Order Theory of Financing: The Case of Korean Manufacturing Firms
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Research on Pecking Order Theory of Financing: The Case of Korean Manufacturing Firms
Lee, Jang-Woo; Hurr, Hee-Young;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This paper empirically tests pecking order theory. Korean listed firms are used as the samples. On the whole we find supportive results for pecking order theory. The fixed effect model on the whole period shows that as pecking order theory suggests that debt ratio decreases as cash flow. ROA, physical assets, and firm size increase. Again, it is shown that corporate debt ratio significantly decreases as cash flow or ROA increases in every sub-sample, which coincides with the prediction of pecking order theory. Corporate debt ratio significantly decreases as physical assets or jinn size increases in case of the whole sample, pre-financial crisis period, and the sub-samples by q-ratio, which also supports the prediction of pecking order theory. Statistical significance of the coefficients of physical assets or firm size completely disappears after Korean financial crisis. Perhaps it is because the role of physical assets or firm size as a mitigator of information asymmetry significantly weakens after the financial crisis as Korean financial market becomes more transparent. For small firms only size variable is negatively and significantly related with debt to assets. It seems that size is an important factor for smaller firms in making financing decision.
 Keywords
Pecking order theory;Korean financial crisis;fixed effect model;OLS;q-ratio;size;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Chirinko, Robert S. and Anuja R. Singha, Testing Static Trade-off against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure: A Critical Comment, Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 417-425, 2000. crossref(new window)

2.
Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French, Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and Debt, Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1-33, 2002. crossref(new window)

3.
Fisher, E.O., R. Heinkel and J. Zechner, Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests, Journal of Finance, 44, 19-40, 1988. crossref(new window)

4.
Frank, Murray Z. and Vidhan K. Goyal, Testing the Pecking Oder Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 217-248, 2003. crossref(new window)

5.
Harris, M. and A. Raviv, The Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Finance, 46, 297-355, 1991 crossref(new window)

6.
Helwege and Liang, Is There a Pecking Order? Evidence from Panel of IPO Firms, Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 429-458, 1996. crossref(new window)

7.
Jangwoo Lee, A Study on Growth Options and Debt Policies, The Korean Journal of Financial Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, 115-133, 2006. (translated in English)

8.
Jangwoo Lee, Sung-Ki Chang, Choong-Seop Lee, A research on the information content of free cash flow in the KSE before and after the Korean financial crisis in 1997, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 1323-1343, 2004. (translated in English)

9.
Kim Pil Kyu, The Financing Behavior and Financial structure Determinants of Korean Manufacturing Firms, Working Paper, 2006.

10.
Kwack Seh Young, A Study on Pecking Order Theory, The Korean Journal of Financial Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, 215-229, 2004. (translated in Korean)

11.
Myers, S. C., Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147-175, 1977. crossref(new window)

12.
Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf, Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187-221, 1984. crossref(new window)

13.
Narayanan, M. P., Debt versus Equity under Asymmetric Information, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23, 39-51, 1988. crossref(new window)

14.
Shyam-Sunder, L. and S. C. Myers, Testing Static Tradeoff against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 219-244, 1999. crossref(new window)

15.
Titman, Sheridan and Robert Wessels, The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice, Journal of Finance, 43, 1-19, 1988. crossref(new window)

16.
Yoon Soon Suk, Cash from Operations, Source of Cash Requirements and Financing Policy, Korean Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 1, 203-231, 2003. (translated in Korean)

17.
Yoon Jong In, Kim Hyeong Chul, An Empirical Study on the Validity of Pecking Order Theory and Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: the Case of Korean Listed Firms, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, Vol. 25, 301-342, 1999. (translated in Korean)