JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
User Perceptions of Uncertainty in the Evaluation of Search Results
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : International Journal of Contents
  • Volume 8, Issue 1,  2012, pp.100-107
  • Publisher : The Korea Contents Association
  • DOI : 10.5392/IJoC.2012.8.1.100
 Title & Authors
User Perceptions of Uncertainty in the Evaluation of Search Results
Kim, Yang-Woo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
While considerable research suggests that users` uncertainty gradually decreases, as they proceed through the information seeking process, others argue that it can arise at any stage of their information seeking process. Reflecting the latter view, this study examined user perceptions of uncertainty in the final stage of users` information seeking process, the stage of search results evaluation. Considering the significance of Web search engines for academic study, this study investigated the relevance decision stage of scholarly researchers in the field of science, who use Web search engines for their academic study. Based on the analysis of the users` uncertainty, this study provided implications to improve information systems and Web contents design.
 Keywords
Web Contents Design;Relevance;Uncertainty;Information Education;Information System;Interdisciplinary Studies;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
C. C. Kuhlthau, "A principle of uncertainty for information seeking," Journal of Documentation, vol. 49, no. 4, 1993, pp. 339-355. crossref(new window)

2.
C. C. Kuhlthau, Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 1993.

3.
T. D. Wilson, D. Ellis and N. Ford, Uncertainty in information seeking: A research project in the Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2000, Available at: http://www.shef.ac.uk/-is/research/imrg/uncerty.html, accessed 28 Nov. 2011.

4.
T. D. Wilson, D. Ellis, N. Ford and A. Foster, "Uncertainty in information seeking. Final report to the British Library Research and Innovation Centre/Library and Information Commission on a research project carried out at the Department of Information Studies," Library and Information Commission Research Report vol. 59, 1999, Available at:http://www.shef.ac.uk/-is/publications/unis/, accessed 28 Nov. 2011.

5.
T. D. Wilson, N. Ford, D. Ellis, A. Foster and A. Spink, "Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 2. Uncertainty and its correlates," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 9, 2002, pp. 704-715. crossref(new window)

6.
Y. Kim, "User perceptions of uncertainty in the selection of information retrieval system: Implications for system and service improvement," International Journal of Contents, vol. 5, no. 3, 2009, pp.40-49.

7.
Y. Kim, "Typology of user uncertainty in the selection of Web search terms: Insight into the information seeking context of scholarly researchers in the field of science," Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, vol. 23, no. 2, 2006, pp. 287-309. crossref(new window)

8.
L. Rodriguez, "Uncertain relevance judgments: A quantitative and qualitative study," Proc. Great Lakes Conference, 2000, pp.17-25.

9.
A. Spink, "Partial relevance judgments during interactive information retrieval: An exploratory study," Proc. The 60th ASIS Annual Meeting, 1997, pp.111-122.

10.
A. Spink and H. Greisdorf, "Users' partial relevance judgments during online searching," Online and CD-ROM Review, vol. 21, 1997, pp. 271-279. crossref(new window)

11.
A. Spink, H. Greisdorf and J. Bateman, "From highly relevant to not relevant: Examining different regions of relevance," Information Processing and Management, vol. 34, 1998, pp. 599-621. crossref(new window)

12.
J.C. Spender, "Exploring uncertainty and emotion in the knowledge-based theory of the firm," Information Technology & People, vol. 16, no. 3, 2003, pp. 266-288. crossref(new window)

13.
T. D. Anderson, 2006. "Uncertainty in action: observing information seeking within the creative processes of scholarly research," Information Research, vol.12, no.1, 2006, pp. 283-303. [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/12-1/paper283.html]

14.
S. Chowdhury & F. Gibb, "Relationship among activities and problems causing uncertainty in information seeking and retrieval," Journal of Documentation, vol., 65, n.3, 2009, pp.470-499. crossref(new window)

15.
K. A. McKibbon, et al., "How primary care physicians' attitudes toward risk and uncertainty affect their use of electronic information resources," Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol.95, no.2, 2007, pp. 138-146. crossref(new window)

16.
E. J. Brumfield, "Using online tutorials to reduce uncertainty in information seeking behavior," Journal of Library Administration, vol. 48, n. 3/4, 2008, pp.365-377. crossref(new window)

17.
I. Fourie, I. "Learning from research on the information behaviour of healthcare professionals: a review of the literature 2004-2008 with a focus on emotion," Health Information & Libraries Journal, vol. 26, no.3, 2009, pp. 171-186. crossref(new window)

18.
J. Kallehauge, "Stage-driven information seeking process: Value and uncertainty of work tasks from initiation to resolution," Journal of Information Science, vol. 36, no. 2, 2010, pp. 242-262. crossref(new window)

19.
L. Adams, "Uncertainty in information seeking behavior in the virtual playground of Generation Y students at Stellenbosch University," Innovation, vol.40, 2010, pp. 69-81.

20.
S. Chowdhuary, F. Gibb & M. Landoni, "Uncertainty in information seeking and retrieval: A study in an academic environment," Information Processing and Management, vol. 47, no.2, 2011, pp. 157-175. crossref(new window)

21.
B. Guo,"The scope of external information seeking under uncertainty: An individual-level study," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 31, no.2, 2011, pp. 137-148. crossref(new window)

22.
G. Krampen, et al., "Psychologists' research activities and professional information-seeking behaviour: Empirical analyses with reference to the theory of the Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences," Journal of Information Science, vol. 37, no. 4, 2011, pp. 439-450. crossref(new window)

23.
A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.

24.
A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.), SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1998

25.
H. Rieh and S.Y. Rieh, "Information seeking, evaluation, and use on the Internet: A case study of science and engineering scholars," Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, vol. 18, no.4, 2001, pp.163-181.

26.
O. R. Holsti, Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.

27.
K. Krippendorff, Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage