JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Detecting Crime Hot Spots Using GAM and Local Moran`s I
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Detecting Crime Hot Spots Using GAM and Local Moran`s I
Cheong, Jin-Seong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Scientific analysis of crime hot spots is essential in preventing and/or suppressing crime. However, results could be different depending on the analytic methods, which highlights the importance of choosing adequate tools. The purpose of this study was to introduce two advanced techniques for detecting crime hot spots, GAM and Local Moran`s I, hoping for more police agencies to adopt better techniques.GAM controls for the number of population in study regions, but local Moran`s I does not. That is, GAM detects high crime rate areas, whereas local Moran`s I identifies high crime volume areas. For GAM, physical disorder was used as a proxy measure for population at risk based on the logic of the broken windows theory. Different regions were identified as hot spots. Although GAM is generally regarded as a more advanced method in that it controls for population, it`s usage is limited to only point data. Local Moran`s I is adequate for zonal data, but suffers from the unavoidable MAUP(Modifiable Areal Unit Problem).
 Keywords
GAM(Geographical Analysis Machine);Local Moran`s I;Crime Hot Spots;Physical Disorder;Broken Windows Theory;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
E. Jefferis, "A multi-method exploration of crime hot spots," Proc. Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, 1998.

2.
J. Eck, J. Gersh, and C. Taylor, "Mapping hot spots of crime and related events," Proc. Spatial Analysis of Crime, 1997.

3.
C. Mamalian and N. La Vigne, The Use of Computerized Crime Mapping by Law Enforcement: Survey Results, National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1999.

4.
J.Q. Wilson and G.L. Kelling, "The Police and Neighborhood Safety: Broken Windows," Atlantic Monthly, vol. 127, 1982, pp. 29-38.

5.
R.D. Baller, L. Anselin, S.F. Messner, G. Deane, and D.F. Hawkins, "Structural Covariates of U.S. County Homicide Rates: Incorporating Spatial Effects," Criminology, vol. 39, no. 3, 2001, pp. 561-590. crossref(new window)

6.
R.J. Sampson, S.W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls, "Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy," Science, vol. 277, 1997, pp. 918- 924. crossref(new window)

7.
S. Openshaw, M. Charlton, C. Wymer, and A.W. Craft, "A Mark I Geographical Analysis Machine for the Automated Analysis of Point Data Sets," International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, vol. 1, 1987, pp. 335-358. crossref(new window)

8.
L. Anselin, "Local Indicators of Spatial Association- LISA," Geographical Analysis, vol. 27, no. 2, 1995, pp. 93-115.

9.
W.G. Skogan, Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods, Free Press, New York, 1990.

10.
T.C. Bailey and A.C. Gatrell, Interactive Spatial Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Addison-Wesley, 1995.