JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Post Milking Teat Dip Effect on Somatic Cell Count, Milk Production and Composition in Cows and Buffaloes
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Post Milking Teat Dip Effect on Somatic Cell Count, Milk Production and Composition in Cows and Buffaloes
Shailja, Shailja; Singh, Mahendra;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The effect of post milking teat dipping on somatic cell count (SCC) of milk was determined in 20 Crossbred cows and 20 Murrah buffaloes selected from institute's herd. The animals were divided into two groups of 10 each. Animals of Group I (control) were teat washed with water before the milking while Group II animals were applied teat dipping solution after the completion of milking. The cows were milked 3 times a day while buffaloes were milked twice a day. The milk samples were collected from control and treated animals on day 0, 5, 10, 15, respectively. The milk samples were analyzed for milk constituents like fat, protein, lactose, chloride, IgG, NEFA, pH and EC and total and differential somatic cell counts. The changes in milk composition and somatic cell counts were significantly different (p<0.01) between the animals and between the breeds. However SCC, chloride content (p<0.05) and epithelial cells (p<0.01) varied during different days of study. The alterations in SCC, epithelial cells, TLC, lymphocyte, neutrophil, IgG, and protein content were significantly different (p<0.01) between control and treated groups. The pH, EC, protein, SCC, epithelial cells, lymphocyte and neutrophil cells of milk declined significantly (p<0.05) after the application of teat dipping, the respective values were 6.5 vs 6.40, 2.28 vs 2.37 mhos, 3.33 vs 4.04%, 1.00 vs , 0.39 vs , 0.36 vs and 0.17 vs in cows. However in buffaloes, epithelial cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, EC and SCC declined (p<0.05) after application of teat dipping, the values being 0.37 vs , 0.37 vs , 0.14 vs , 2.56 vs 2.37 mhos and 0.94 vs , respectively. The study indicated that post milking teat dipping could be used as an effective method for the lowering of SCC in milk of crossbred cows and buffaloes.
 Keywords
Somatic Cell Counts;Teat Dip;Milk Production and Composition;Cows and Buffaloes;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Allgower, B. 1990. Milk quality and udder health. J. Dairy Sci. 69: 32-37.

2.
Bodoh, G. W., W. J. Battista, L. H. Schultze and R. P. Johnston. 1976. Variation in somatic cell counts in dairy herd improvement milk samples. J. Dairy Sci. 59:1119-1123.

3.
Brander, G. C., R. P. Gord and Watkins. 1975. A large scale mastitis control programme in Somerset. Vet. Rec. 97:300-304.

4.
Cullen, G. A. 1967. Short term variation in the cell count of cows milk. Vet Rec. 80:649-653.

5.
Das, M. and M. Singh. 1999. Variation in blood leucocytes, somatic cell count, yield and composition of milk of crossbred goats. Small Rumin. Res. 35:169- 174. crossref(new window)

6.
Dodd, F. H., D. R. Westgarth, R. G. Kingwill and F. K. Neave. 1969. Mastitis-The strategy of control. J. Dairy Sci. 52:689.

7.
Dohoo, I. R. and A. H. Meek. 1982. Somatic cells counts in bovine milk. Can. Vet. J. 23:119-125.

8.
Eberhart, R. J., H. C. Gilmore, L. J. Hutchison and S. B. Spencer. 1979. Somatic cell counts in DHI samples. In Proc. Nat. Mast. Coun. pp. 32-40.

9.
Erskine, R. J. and R. J. Eberhardt. 1990. Post-milking teat dip use in high and low somatic cell count dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 75(Suppl.1):256.

10.
Everson, T. C. 1980. How the dairy industry can benefit from a somatic cell program. In Proc. Nat. Mast. Coun. pp. 153-166.

11.
Goodhope, R. G. and A. H. Meek. 1980. Factors associated with mastitis in Ontario dairy herds: A case control study. Can. J. comp. Med. 44:351-357.

12.
Haenlein, G. F. W. 1987. Cow and goat milk are not the same especially in somatic cell count. Dairy Goat J. 65:606- 609.

13.
Hamann, J. and J. Reichmuth. 1990. Exogenous influences on quarter milk cell counts with special emphasis on udder health status. Brief Communication of XXIII International Dairy Congress, Montreal, October 12, Vol. I, p. 271.

14.
Harmon, R. J. and B. E. Langlois. 1986. Prevalence of minor mastitis pathogens and associated somatic cell counts. Pages 11-23, In Proc. Natl. Mastitis Counc., 25th Annu. Mtg., Columbus, OH.

15.
Hogan, J. S. and K. L. Smith. 1987. A practical look at environmental mastitis. Comp. Continuing Educ. Pract. Vet., 9:F341.

16.
Hueston, W. D., L. T. Heider, W. R. Harvey and K. L. Smith. 1990. Determinants of high somatic cell count prevalence in dairy herds practising teat dipping and dry cow therapy and with no evidence. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 9(2):131-142. crossref(new window)

17.
I.S.I. 1958. Determination of fat in whole milk, evaporated milk, separated milk, buttermilk and cream by Gerber method. Indian Standards Institution , Manak Bhawan, New Delhi.

18.
I.S.I. 1981. Estimation of chloride content of milk by using $AgNo_3$ method. ISI Handbook of Food Analysis. Part XI SP:18.

19.
Kalit, S. and J. L. Havranek. 1999. Incidence of subclinical mastitis on the farm with various numbers of cows. Kljekarstvo, 49(1):9-14.

20.
King, J. O. L. 1978. Cell counts and composition of bovine milk. Vet. Rec. 103:397-398.

21.
Lee, S. J., C. W. Lin and M. C. Chin. 1994. Relationship between somatic cell count and attributes of raw goat milk. J. Chinese Soc. Anim. Sci. 23:287-294.

22.
Mcbride, H. 1994. Quality of milk production - improving the somatic cell count. Agriculture in Northern Ireland. 8(8):18-19.

23.
McEwan, A. D., E. W. Fisher and I. E. Selman. 1970. A turbidity test for the estimation of Immunoglobins level in neonatal calf serum. Clin. Chem. Acta, 17:155. crossref(new window)

24.
Mein, G. A., W. I. D. Gilmour and J. Ballek. 1977. Mastitis control in Victoria: interrelationships between current practices and farmers knowledge, bulk milk cell count and milk yield per cow. Aust. J. Dairy Techol. 32:81-85.

25.
Moxley, J. E., B. W. Kennedy, B. R. Downey and J. S. T. Bowman. 1978. Survey of milking hygiene practises and their relationships to somatic cell counts and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 61:1637-1644.

26.
Natzke, R. P., R. W. Everett, R. S. Guthrie, J. F. Keown, A. M. Meek, W. G. Merrill, S. J. Roberts and G. H. Schmidt. 1972. Mastitis control program: Effect on milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 55:1256-1260.

27.
Neave, F. K., F. H. Dodd and R. G. Kingwill. 1966. A method of controlling udder disease. Vet. Record. 78:521.

28.
Pankey, J. W., R. J. Eberhart, A. L. Cuming, R. D. Daggett, R. J. Farnsworth and C. K. McDuff. 1984. Update on postmilking teat antiseptics. J. Dairy Sci. 67:1336.

29.
Perry, N. A. and R. J. Doon. 1950. Picric acid method for simultaneous determination for lactose and sucrose in dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 33:176.

30.
Philpot, W. N. 1975. Prevention of infection-hygiene. Page 155 in Proc. Int. Dairy Fed. Seminar on Mastitis Control, Reading University, England, April 7-11.

31.
Postle, D. S., R. P. Natzke and R. W. Everett. 1971. Relationship between leucocytes counts in bulk milk and apparent quarter infections in dairy herds. J. Milk. Fd. Tecnol. 34:517-520.

32.
Reichmuth, J. 1975. Somatic cell counting- interpretation of results. In Proc. Sem. on Mast. Cont. IDF Doc. 85. pp. 93-109.

33.
Schukken, Y. H., K. T. Leslie, A. J. Weersink and S. W. Martin. 1992. Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program. I. Impact on somatic cell counts and milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 75(12):3352-3358.

34.
Scott, H. M., J. M. Sargeant, M. J. Ireland, K. D. Lissemore, K. E. Leslie, D. F. Kelton and B. A. Mallard. 1998. Effect of a core vaccine against Gram-negative bacteria and physiologic yield parameters of dairy cows during late lactation and the dry period. J. Dairy Sci. 81(7):1928-1935.

35.
Schultz, L. H. 1977. Somatic cell counting of milk in production testing programs as a mastitis control technique. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 170:1244-1246.

36.
Sheldrake, R. F., R. J. T. Hoare and G. D. McGregor. 1983. Lactation stage, parity, and infection affecting somatic cells, electrical conductivity, and serum albumin in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 66:542-547.

37.
Shipe, W. F., G. F. Senyk and K. B. Fountain. 1980. Modified copper sopa solvent extraction method for measuring free fatty acids in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 193-198.

38.
Singh, M. and R. S. Ludri. 2000a. Somatic cell count in murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) during different stages of lactation, parity and season. Asian- Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:189-192.

39.
Singh, M. and R. S. Ludri. 2000b. Influence of stages of lactation, Parity and season on somatic cell counts in cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1775-1780.

40.
Singhal, O. P. and Deshraj. 1989. New approaches for chemical quality assurance. Indian Dairyman, 41:43-47.

41.
Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1980. Statistical Methods. (7th Edn.), Iowa State, Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.

42.
Wesen, D. P. and L. H. Schultz. 1970. Effectiveness of a postmilking teat dip in preventing new udder infections. J. Dairy Sci. 53:1391.

43.
Wilson, R. J. et al. 1994. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2103-2112.

44.
Winter, P. 1999. Clinical trials of udder and teat disinfection compounds. Tierarztriche-Umschau, 54(12):699-704.