Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Egg Size and Eggshell Conductance on Hatchability Traits of Meat and Layer Breeder Flocks
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Egg Size and Eggshell Conductance on Hatchability Traits of Meat and Layer Breeder Flocks
Shafey, Tarek M.;
  PDF(new window)
Eggs obtained from 46 and 42 weeks old meat (Hybro) and layer (Leghorn) breeders flocks, respectively were used to examine the effects of genetic type of birds and egg size (small, medium and large) on variables of eggshell characteristics and hatchability traits. The variables measured were egg weight (EW), egg surface area (ESA) and eggshell characteristics (shell conductance (EC), per cent shell (PS), shell thickness (ST), shell volume (SV), shell density (SD) and hatchability traits (per cent hatchability (HP), early dead embryos (ED), late dead embryos (LD), pips with live embryos (PL) and pips with dead embryos (PD)). Genetic type of bird influenced all egg characteristics and HP of eggs. Eggs produced by the small Leghorn bird had lower EW, ESA, EC, ST, SV and HP than those produced by the heavy Hybro bird. The reduction of HP was associated with an increase in the percentage of ED and PL. Egg size influenced all variables measured except ST. Small size eggs had lower EW, ESA and EC and higher PS and SD than those of large eggs. Medium size eggs produced a higher HP when compared with that of large size eggs. The reduction of HP in large eggs was associated with higher percentage of ED, LD and PL. There were significant interactions between the genetic group of birds and egg size on LD and HP. Large egg size of Hybro birds had higher LD and lower HP than those of small size eggs produced by the same flock. However, There was no difference in HP and LD among the different egg sizes produced by Leghorn birds. It was concluded that genetic make up of birds and egg size influence eggshell characteristics and HP. The type of bird (heavy or small) influences the optimum egg size for successful hatching. Attention should be given to the size and eggshell characteristics of eggs of breeders' flocks for achieving maximum HP.
Eggshell;Egg Size;Per Cent Hatchability;Breeder Flocks;
 Cited by
북한강 엷은재첩, Corbicula papyracea (Heude) 의 번식생태,김대희;이완옥;이준상;

한국패류학회지, 2014. vol.30. 2, pp.107-116 crossref(new window)
Domestic Duck Eggs: An Important Pathway of Human Exposure to PBDEs around E-Waste and Scrap Metal Processing Areas in Eastern China, Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47, 16, 9258  crossref(new windwow)
The Effect of Eggshell Thickness on the Hatchability of Guinea Fowl and Pheasants, Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 2016, 18, spe2, 49  crossref(new windwow)
Can feeding the broiler breeder improve chick quality and offspring performance?, Animal Production Science, 2016, 56, 8, 1254  crossref(new windwow)
The effect of eggshell thickness on hatchability of quail eggs, Veterinary World, 2017, 10, 9, 1114  crossref(new windwow)
Effects of egg weight on the egg quality, chick quality, and broiler performance at the later stages of production (week 60) in broiler breeders, The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2017, 1537-0437, pfw061  crossref(new windwow)
Ar, A., C. V. Paganelli, R. B. Reeves, D. G. Greene and H. Rahn. 1974. The avian egg: water vapor conductance, shell thickness, and functional pore area. Condor. 76:153-158. crossref(new window)

Board, R. G. 1980. The avian eggshell-A resistance network. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 48:303-313. crossref(new window)

Christensen, V. L. 1983. Distribution of pores on hatching and nonhatching turkey eggs. Poult. Sci. 62:1312-1316. crossref(new window)

Christensen, V. L. and F. M. McCorkle. 1982. Turkey egg weight losses and embryonic mortality during incubation. Poult. Sci. 61:1209-1213. crossref(new window)

Christensen, V. L. and K. E. Nestor. 1994. Changes in functional qualities of turkey eggshells in strains selected for increased egg production or growth. Poult. Sci. 73:1458-1464. crossref(new window)

Christensen, V. L., G. B. Havenstein and G. S. Davis. 1995. Egg characteristics, carbohydrate metabolism and thyroid hormones in late chick embryos from different genetic lines. Poult. Sci. 74:551-562. crossref(new window)

Marshall, W. and D. B. Cruickshank. 1938. The function of the cuticle in relation to the porosity of eggs. J. Agric. Sci. 28:24-42. crossref(new window)

Meir, M., A. Ar and A. Nir. 1984. Preincubation dipping of turkey eggs. Does it affect eggshell conductance? Poult. Sci. 63:2475-2478. crossref(new window)

Moran, E. T. and B. S. Reinhart. 1979. Physical and chemical characteristics of Small White turkey eggs from older commercial breeder flocks with an examination of changes due to weight and time after lay. Poult. Sci. 58:341-349. crossref(new window)

Nestor, K. E., K. I. Brown and S. A. Touchburn. 1972. Egg quality and poult production in turkeys. 1. Variation during a seven month lay period. Poult. Sci. 51:341-349. crossref(new window)

Peebles, E. D. and J. D. Brake. 1987. Eggshell quality and hatchability in broiler breeder eggs. Poult. Sci. 66:596-604. crossref(new window)

Peebles, E. D., J. D. Brake and R. P. Gildersleeve. 1987. Effects of cuticle removal and incubation humidity on embryonic development and hatchability of broilers. Poult. Sci. 66:834-840. crossref(new window)

Rahn, H., A. Ar and C. V. Paganelli. 1979. How bird eggs breathe. Scientific Am. 240:46-55.

Rahn, H., C. V. Paganelli, I. C. T. Nisbet and G. C. Whittow. 1976. Regulation of incubation water loss in eggs of seven species of terns. Physiol. Zool. 49:245-259. crossref(new window)

Rahn, H., V. L. Christensen and F. W. Eden. 1981. Changes in egg conductance, pores, and physical dimensions of egg and shell during the first breeding cycle of turkey hens. Poult. Sci. 60:2536-2541. crossref(new window)

SAS Institute.1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC..

Taylor, L. W., A. Sjodin and C. A. Gunn. 1956. The gaseous environment of the chick embryo in relation to its development and hatchability. 1. Effect of carbon dioxide and oxygen levels during the period of the first four days of incubation upon hatchability. Poult. Sci. 35:1206-1215. crossref(new window)

Tullett, S. G. 1978. Pore size versus pore number in avian eggshells. In: Respiratory Function in Birds, Adult and Embryonic (Ed. J. Riiper). Springer, Berlin, Germany. pp. 217-226.

Tullett, S. G. 1981. Theoretical and practical aspects of eggshell porosity. Turkeys. 29:24-28.

Tullett, S. G. 1984. Minireview. The porosity of avian eggshells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78A:5-13. crossref(new window)

Tullett, S. G. 1990. Science and the art of incubation. Poult. Sci. 69:1-15. crossref(new window)

Tullett, S. G. and R. G. Board. 1977. Determinants of avian eggshell porosity. J. Zool., London 183:203-211. crossref(new window)

Tullett, S. G. and F. G. Burton. 1982. Factors affecting the weight and water status of the chick at hatch. Br. Poult. Sci. 23:361-369. crossref(new window)

Tullett, S. G. and F. G. Burton. 1986. The recent reawakening of interest in bird physiology particularly eggs, eggshell porosity and embryonic respiration. Wiss. Z. Humboldt-Univ. Berl. Math.-Naturiss. Reihe 35:273-284.

Visschedijk, A. H. J. 1968. The air space and embryonic respiration. 1. The pattern of gaseous exchange in the fertile egg during the closing stages of incubation. Br. Poult. Sci. 9:173-184. crossref(new window)

Wangensteen, O. D., D. Wilson and H. Rahn. 1970/71. Diffusion of gases across the shell of the hen's egg. Res. Physiol. 11:16-30. crossref(new window)

Wilson, H. R. 1991. Interrelationships of egg size, posthatching growth and hatchability. World's Poult. Sci. J. 47:5-20. crossref(new window)