JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Feeding Value of Sugarcane Stalk for Cattle
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Feeding Value of Sugarcane Stalk for Cattle
Kawashima, T.; Sumamal, W.; Pholsen, P.; Chaithiang, R.; Boonpakdee, W.; Kurihara, M.; Shibata, M.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A metabolism trial with four castrated male Brahman cattle, average body weight 320 kg, was conducted in order to determine the nutritive value of chopped sugarcane stalk (CSS) for the establishment of feeding strategy in the dry season in Northeast Thailand. Animals were subjected to the following four dietary treatments: Treatment 1; 100% of CSS, Treatment 2; 70% of CSS and 30% of commercial complete feed (TMR), Treatment 3; 40% of CSS and 60% of TMR, and Treatment 4; 100% of TMR. The average CP, ether extracts, nitrogen free extracts, crude fiber and ash contents of CSS were 2.0, 0.9, 79.0, 16.1 and 2.2%, respectively. Although the amount of feed given was approximately at maintenance level, animals in treatments 1 and 2 refused a part of feed. The metabolism trial revealed that total digestible nutrient and metabolizable energy contents of CSS were 61.5% and 9.04 MJ/kgDM, respectively, when it was properly supplemented with protein sources. Nutritive value of CSS was lowered when animals were given CSS solely. This was due to the large loss of energy into urine and methane. Voluntary intake of CSS in cattle was not enough to satisfy energy requirement for maintenance. The CSS can be used as a roughage for feeding cattle in the dry season with proper supplementation of protein and energy.
 Keywords
Sugarcane Stalk;Cattle;Metabolizable Energy;Nutritive Value;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Ruminal Degradation of Sugarcane Stalk,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2003. vol.16. 9, pp.1280-1284 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council Secretariat. 1995. Standard Tables of Feed Composition in Japan. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan.

2.
AOAC. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis, 12th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC.

3.
Boontum, A. and P. Thumtong 1997. Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) In: A Guide Book for Field Crops Production in Thailand. Field Crops Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 21-31.

4.
Ferreiro, H. M. and T. R. Preston. 1977. Digestibility and voluntary intake of chopped or derinded sugarcane stalk, with and without addition of cane tops. Trop. Anim. Prod. 2:90-99.

5.
Ffoulkes, D. and T. R. Preston. 1978. The banana plant as cattle feed: Digestibility and voluntary intake of mixtures of sugar cane and banana forage. Trop. Anim. Prod. 3:125-129.

6.
Forbes, J. M. 1995. Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals. CAB International, NY, USA.

7.
Garrett, W. N. 1979. Energy utilization by growing cattle as determined in 72 comparative slaughter experiments. In:Energy Metabolism, Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Energy Metabolism held at Churchill College, Cambridge, September, 1979. (Ed. Laurence E. Mount). Butterworths, London 1-7.

8.
Kawashima, T., W. Sumamal, P. Pholsen, R. Chaithiang and W. Boonpakdee. 2001a. Relative Aerial Biomass Yield and Changes in Chemical Composition after Cutting of Sugarcane in Northeast Thailand. JIRCAS Journal No. 9 47-52.

9.
Kawashima, T., W. Sumamal, F. Terada and M. Shibata. 2001b. Respiration Trial System Using Ventilated Flow-through Method with a Face Mask. JIRCAS Journal No. 9 53-74.

10.
Kearl, L. C. 1982. Nutrient requirements of ruminants in developing countries. International Feedstuffs Institute. Utah State University, Logan, Utah.

11.
Kurihara, M., M. Shibata, T. Nishida, A. Purnomoad and F. Terada. 1997. Methane production and its dietary manipulation in ruminants. Rumen microbes and digestive physiology in ruminants (Ed. R. Onodera et al.). Japan Sci. Soc. Press, Tokyo/S. Karger, Basel 199-208.

12.
Leng, R. A. and T. R. Preston. 1976. Sugar cane for cattle production: Present constraints, perspectives and research priorities. Trop. Anim. Prod. 1:1-27.

13.
Marte, J. A., F. Olivo and F. D. Deb Hovell. 1978. The digestibility of chopped sugar cane supplemented with molasses or wheat bran. Trop. Anim. Prod. 3:56-61.

14.
McLean, J. A. 1972. On the calculation of HP from open-circuit calorimetric measurements. Br. J. Nutr. 27:597-600. crossref(new window)

15.
Montpellier, F. A. and T. R. Preston. 1977. Digestibility and voluntary intake on sugar cane diets: Effects of chopping the cane stalk in particles of different sizes. Trop. Anim. Prod. 2(1)40-43.

16.
Mould, F. L., E. R. Orskov and S. O. Mann. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 10:15-30. crossref(new window)

17.
Obara Y, H. Fuse, F. Terada, M. Shibata, A. Kawabata, M. Sutoh, K. Hodate and M. Matsumoto. 1994. Influence of sucrose supplementation on nitrogen kinetics and energy metabolism in sheep fed with lucerne hay cubes. J. Agric. Sci. 123:121-127. crossref(new window)

18.
Preston, T. R. 1988. Sugarcane as animal feed: Overview. In:Sugarcane as Feed. (Ed. R. Sansoucy, G. Aarts and T. R. Preston). FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 72. FAO Rome, Italy. 61-71.

19.
SAS. 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Volume 2, Version 6, Fourth edition. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.

20.
Sutoh, M, Y. Obara and S. Miyamoto. 1996. The effect of sucrose supplementation on kinetics of nitrogen, ruminal propionate and plasma glucose in sheep. J. Agric. Sci. 126:99-105. crossref(new window)