JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Dietary Energy and Protein Contents on Buffalo Milk Yield and Quality during Advanced Lactation Period
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Dietary Energy and Protein Contents on Buffalo Milk Yield and Quality during Advanced Lactation Period
Bovera, F.; Calabro, S.; Cutrignelli, M.I.; Di Lella, T.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Among Italian buffalo farmers, it is widely held that administering diets with high energy and protein concentrations is an effective way to increase milk production. In order to assess the validity of this opinion, we verified milk yield and physico-chemical characteristics from buffaloes that, from the month of lactation, were fed two total mixed rations (TMRs) which, given the same intake, should have led to satisfaction of protein requirements though with a slight energy deficit (diet A) or excessive amounts of energy and protein (diet B). Estimate of the energy and protein value of the diets and that of the corresponding requirements was carried out both by using two software programs derived from the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (1992), and with the method set up by INRA researchers (1988). The results obtained show that the two diets administered did not result in significant changes to the quantity of milk produced. However, with Diet B the protein concentration in the milk was significantly (p<0.01) higher, although this was partly offset by the higher concentration (p<0.05) of non-protein nitrogen (NNP). The Group B buffaloes also showed significantly higher blood urea levels (p<0.01), with concentrations exceeding those considered physiological for lactating buffaloes. Finally, while administering Diet A the Body Condition Score (BCS) was close to 6.5 (Wagner et al., 1988), whereas in buffaloes which used Diet B it sometimes increased by over 0.5 points. As regards which of the two methods compared is more suitable for expressing dietary energy and protein value and corresponding requirements, we feel that due to the high variability in the Italian Mediterranean buffalo's milk production aptitude, it would be premature to express a judgement on methods which rest on a common scientific base and do not differ substantially.
 Keywords
Italian Mediterranean Buffalo;Milk Production;Dietary Energy and Protein Level;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
ASPA. 1980. Food evaluation Commission. Livestock Food evaluation. Chemical analysis. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 6:19-34.

2.
ASPA. 1995. Commission for the Methodology for Evaluating Milk Yield and Quality. Analytical Methods for Milk from the main Livestock Species. Press center, University of Perugia, Italy.

3.
ASPA. 1999. Evaluation Commission of Livestock Endocrine and Metabolic Structure Guide to the interpretation of metabolic profiles. Press center, University of Perugia, Italy.

4.
Bovera, F., M. I. Cutrignelli, S. Calabro, V. Piccolo and T. Di Lella. 2000. Rationing for lactating Mediterranean buffalo cows using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System. Bubalus Bubalis IV: 67-77.

5.
Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System version 4.0.29. 2000. Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

6.
CPM-Dairy version 1.0. 1998. The Center for Animal Health and Productivity, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square PA; The Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca NY; and The William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute, Chazy NY.

7.
Di Lella, T. 1998. Buffalo nutrition. In Third course on biotechnology of reproduction in buffaloes. Bubalus Bubalis II: 207-216.

8.
Di Palo, R. 1992. Produzione lattea nella bufala con diete tradizionali e con impiego di acidi grassi. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Naples, Italy.

9.
Fox, D. G., C. J. Sniffen, J. D. O'Connor, J. B. Russel and P. J. Van Soest. 1992. A Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and diet adequacy. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 3578-3596.

10.
INRA. 1988. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.

11.
Martillotti, F., M. Antongiovanni, L. Rizzi, E. Santi and G. Bittante. 1987. Metodi di analisi per la valutazione degli alimenti di impiego zootecnico. Ed. IPRA.

12.
Russel, J. B., J. D. O'Connor, D. G. Fox, P. J. Van Soest and C. J. Sniffen. 1992. A Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Evaluating Cattle Diets: I. Ruminal Fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3551-3561.

13.
SAS. 2000. SAS/STAT$^{\circledR}$ Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 8.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

14.
Sniffen, C. J., J. D. O'Connor, P. J. Van Soest, D. G. Fox and J. B. Russel. 1992. A Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3562-3577.

15.
Wagner, J. J., J. Lusby, J. W. Oltejen, J. Rakestraw, R. P. Wettermann and L. E. Walters. 1988. Carcass composition in mature Hereford cows: estimation and effect on daily metabolizable energy requirement during winter. J. Anim. Sci. 66: 603-612.