JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Growth and Nutrient Utilization in Buffalo Calves Fed Urea-ammoniated Wheat Straw and Hydrochloric Acid plus Urea Treated Wheat Straw
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Growth and Nutrient Utilization in Buffalo Calves Fed Urea-ammoniated Wheat Straw and Hydrochloric Acid plus Urea Treated Wheat Straw
Nair, P.V.; Verma, A.K.; Dass, R.S.; Mehra, U.R.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Ten growing male buffalo calves (aged 6-8 months, average body weight kg were divided randomly into two groups. Animals in group I were fed on concentrate mixture A (CP 20.2%, TDN 77.4%) and urea- ammoniated wheat straw (UAWS) while the animals in group II were fed on concentrate mixture B (CP 17.9%, TDN 77.6%) and HCl plus urea treated wheat straw (HCl UAWS) to meet their nutrient requirement for 500 g gain/d as per Kearl (1982). This feeding practice lasted for 120 days, during which fortnightly body weight were recorded to assess their growth rate. A metabolism trial was conducted after 90 days of experimental feeding to compare the digestibility of nutrients, their balance, plane of nutrition and relative cost of feeding in two groups of animals. Results revealed a significant increase in the CP content of ammoniated wheat straw due to addition of HCl viz 12.1% from 7.5%. There was a decrease in the intake of DM (p<0.05), OM (p<0.05), EE (p<0.05), NDF (p<0.01), ADF (p<0.01), cellulose (p<0.01) and hemicellulose (p<0.01) in group II as compared to group I. The digestibility (%) of DM, OM and CP was significantly (p<0.01) more in group II, whereas the digestibility (%) was significantly more for NDF (p<0.05) and hemicellulose (p<0.01) in group I than group II. There was no significant difference in the N, Ca and P balance in two groups. Intake of total DM (g/d) or (g/kg ) was significantly (p<0.01) more in group I as compared to group II, whereas the intake of DCP and TDN (g/d or g/kg ) was alike in two groups. The total body weight gain (kg), average daily gain (g/d) and feed conversion efficiency were significantly (p<0.01) more in UAWS fed group as compared to HCl UAWS fed group. Feeding cost (Rs./kg. weight gain) was significantly (p<0.05) more in group II as compared to group I. It is concluded that HCl UAWS is not suitable for the feeding of growing buffalo calves as it reduced the growth rate in comparison to UAWS fed buffalo calves.
 Keywords
Buffalo Calves;Urea-Ammoniation;Hydrochloric Acid;Urea Ammoniated Wheat Straw;Growth;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Influence of Urea Treatment and Soybean Meal (Urease) Addition on the Utilization of Wheat Straw by Sheep,;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2005. vol.18. 7, pp.957-965 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official Methods of Analysis; 13th ed. Washington, DC.

2.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis; 15th ed. Washington, DC.

3.
Borhami, B. E. A., F. Sundstol and T. H. Garmo. 1982. Studies on ammonia treated straw. II. Fixation of ammonia in treated straw by spraying with acids. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 7:53-59. crossref(new window)

4.
Cloette, S. W. P. and N. M. Kritzinger. 1984. The fixation of nitrogen in urea-ammoniated wheat straw by means of different acids. South African J. Anim. Sci. 14(4):173-176.

5.
Dass, R. S., Jai Kishan and U. B. Singh. 1984. Effect of feeding urea (ammonia) treated paddy straw on rumen metabolism in crossbred animals. The Indian J. Nutr. Dietet. 21:342-349.

6.
Dass, R. S., U. R. Mehra and U. B. Singh. 1993a. Effect of acidified sodium sulphite and urea-ammonia treatment on the utilization of wheat straw by rumen micro-organisms. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 62:324-328.

7.
Dass, R. S., U. R. Mehra, U. B. Singh and G. S. Bisht. 1993b. Degradability of DM and fiber constituents of lingo-cellulosic residues treated with SO2 (evolved from acidified sodium sulphite) and urea/ammonia. World Review of Animal Production 28:55-64.

8.
Dass, R. S., U. R. Mehra and A. K. Verma. 2000. Nitrogen fixation and in situ dry matter and fiber constituents disappearance of wheat straw treated with urea and boric acid in Murrah buffaloes. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 13(8):1133-36.

9.
Dass, R. S., A. K. Verma, U. R. Mehra and D. S. Sahu. 2001. Nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation pattern in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) fed urea and urea plus hydrochloric acid treated wheat straw. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14(11):1542-1548.

10.
Fahmy, S. T. M. and E. R. Orskov. 1989. Digestion and utilization of straw Effect of different chemical treatments on degradability and digestibility of barley straw by sheep. Anim. Prod. 38:69-74.

11.
Khan, M. J., J. R. Scaife and F. D. Hovell. 1999. The effect of different sources of urease enzyme on nutritive value of wheat straw treated with urea as source of ammonia Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 12:1063-1067.

12.
Kearl, L. C. 1982. Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants in Developing countries International Feedstuff Institute, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.

13.
L'Estrange, J. L. and F. Murphy. 1972. Effects of dietary minerals acids on voluntary food intake, digestion, mineral metabolism and acid-base balance of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 28:1-17. crossref(new window)

14.
Mehra, U. R., R. S. Dass, A. K. Verma and D. S. Sahu. 2001. Effect of feeding urea and acetic acid treated wheat straw on the digestibility of nutrients in adult male Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14(11):1690-1695.

15.
Mehra, U. R., N. N. Pathak, U. B. Singh and R. S. Dass. 1989. Studies on the nutritional improvement of sorghum stover (Jowar kadbi) through ammoniation by urea ensiling. Biological Waste 29:67-71. crossref(new window)

16.
Rath, S. S., A. K. Verma, Putan Singh, R. S. Dass and U. R. Mehra. 2001. Performance of growing lambs fed urea-ammoniated and urea supplemented based diets. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14(8):1078-83.

17.
Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical Methods, 6th edn. Oxford and IBH Publication, Calcutta, India.

18.
Taiwo, A. A., E. A. Adebowale, J. F. D. Greenhalgh and O. Akinsoyinu. 1995. Techniques for trapping ammonia generated from urea treatment of barley straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 56:133-141. crossref(new window)

19.
Talapatra, S. K., S. C. Roy and K. C. Sen. 1940. Estimation of phosphorus, chlorine, calcium, sodium and potassium in foodstuffs. Indian J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 10:243-258.

20.
Toroitich, M. J. 1992. Minimizing the loss of ammonia during urea treatment of wheat straw for growing calves. M.Sc. Thesis CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar, India.

21.
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3553-3597.

22.
Yadav, B. S. and A. S. Virk. 1994a. The fixation of nitrogen using acid, green forage and germinated barley during urea treatment of straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 50:123-135. crossref(new window)

23.
Yadav, B. S. and A. S. Virk. 1994b. Effect of acid treatment in reducing ammonia loss during urea ammoniation of straw. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 64(7):762-766.