Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Extreme Light Regime on Production and Characteristics of Egg in Laying Geese
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Extreme Light Regime on Production and Characteristics of Egg in Laying Geese
Wang, S.D.; Wang, C.M.; Fan, Y.K.; Jan, D.F.; Chen, L.R.;
  PDF(new window)
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of long light regime (20 h light and 4 h dark, 20L:4D) and short light regime (4 h light and 20 h dark, 4L:20D) on egg production and egg characteristics of laying geese. Thirty-six laying birds, 4 replicates of 3 birds per treatment were allotted to three light regimes, i.e., 20L:4D, 4L:20D, and natural light (NAT) from March 7 to June 20. Results showed that the geese in 20L:4D consumed 54 g less feed per goose daily and laid 17.5 less eggs per goose (p<0.05) comparing to those in 4L:20D. The number of days from initiation of light treatment till cease of laying was 22 days shorter (p<0.05) in 20L:4D comparing to that in NAT. Five geese (41.7%) in 4L:20D kept laying by the end of applying light regime. Weight and surface area of the eggs in 4L:20D were greater (p<0.05) comparing to those in the other two light regimes. It is concluded that the period of egg production in goose could be manipulated by light regime in the ways such as using short light regime of 4 h light daily to prolong egg production through summer and using long light regime of 20 h light daily to induce cease of egg production.
Laying Goose;Light Regime;Egg Production;Egg Characteristics;
 Cited by
Effect of Self-photoperiod on Live Weight, Carcass and Growth Traits in Quails (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica),Coban, Omer;Lacin, Ekrem;Sabuncuoglu, Nilufer;Ozudogru, Zekeriya;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009. vol.22. 3, pp.410-415 crossref(new window)
Etches, R. J. 1996. The egg, In: Reproduction in Poultry, CAB International. Cambridge. pp. 10-39.

Gillette, D. D. 1976. Laying patterns of geese in the Mid West. Poult. Sci. 55:1143-1146.

Kinney, T., R. E. Burger and R. N. Shoffner. 1959. Response of Emden geese to light. Poult. Sci. 38:1469-1470.

Lewis, P. D., G. C. Perry and T. R. Morris. 1994. Lighting and egg shell quality. World's Poult. Sci. J. 50:288-291.

Parry, D. M., A. R. Goldsmith, R. P. Millar and L. M. Glennie. 1997. Immunocytochemical localization of GnRH precursor in the hypothalamus of European starlings during sexual maturation and photorefractoriness. J. Neuroendocrinol. 9:235-243. crossref(new window)

Petersen, C. F., E. A. Sauter, E. E. Steele and J. F. Parkinson. 1983. Use of methionine intake restriction to improve egg shell quality by control of egg weight. Poult. Sci. 62:2044-2047.

Pingel, H. 1990. Genetics of egg production and reproduction in waterfowl. In: Poultry Breeding and Genetics (Ed. R. D. Crawford). Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. pp. 771-780.

Rosinski, A., R. Rouvier, S. Wezyk, N. Sellier, H. Bielinska and D. Rousselot-Pailley. 1995. Reproductive performance of geese kept in different management systems. Proceedings of 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. Halle, Germany. pp. 20-28.

Rosinski, A., R. Rouvier, G. Guy, D. Rousselot-Pailley and H. Bielinska. 1996. Possibilities of increasing reproductive performance and meat production in geese. Proceedings XX World's Poultry Congress. New-Dehli, India. pp. 724-735.

Rousselot-Pailley, D. and N. Sellier. 1990. Influence de quelques facteurs zootechniques sur la fertilite des oies. In: Control of Fertility in Domestic Birds (Ed. J. P. Brillard). Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. Versailles, France. pp. 145-154.

SAS Institute Inc. 1996. The SAS$^{\circledR}$ System for Windows. Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Carry, North Carolina.

Sauveur, B. 1982. Programmes lumineux a un etalement de la periode de reproduction de l'oie. Annales de Zootech. 31:171-186. crossref(new window)

Schneider, K. H., H. Jurk and R. Schlagel. 1980. The effect of light upon the egg yield in geese. Proceedings of International Conference Breeding and Geese Production. Koluda Wielka, Poland. pp. 49-63.

Scragg, R. H., N. B. Logan and N. Geddes. 1987. Response of egg weight to the inclusion of various fats in layer diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 28:15-21. crossref(new window)

Sellier, N. and D. Rousselot-Pailley. 1999. Effects of lighting programs, artificial insemination and improvement of gosling production. A synthesis of results in experimental station of waterfowl producing fatty liver. Symposium INRA/COA on Scientific Cooperation in Agriculture. Toulouse, France. pp. 123-135.

Sharp, P. J. 1993. Photoperiodic control of reproduction in the domestic hen. Poult. Sci. 72:897-905.

Sharp, P. J. 1996. Strategies in avian breeding cycles. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 42:505-513. crossref(new window)

Summer, J. D. and S. Leeson. 1985. Poultry Nutrition Handbook. University of Guelph.

Wang, S. D., L. T. Yeh and S. K. Yang. 1998. Effects of short days and long days on reproduction in female geese. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci. 27(Suppl.):64(Abstr.).

Wang, S. D., G. C. Wu and L. T. Yeh. 1999. Effects of crude fiber in holding diet and crude protein in breeding diet on performance of first laying geese. Taiwan Livestock Res. 32:343-352.

Wilson, F. E. and B. D. Reinert. 1998. Effect of withdrawing long days from male American Tree Sparrows (Spizella arborea):Implications for understanding thyroid-dependent programming of seasonal reproduction and postnuptial molt. Biol. Reprod. 58:15-19. crossref(new window)