JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Restricted and Ad. libitum Feeding during Late Pregnancy on the Performance of Crossbred Cows and Their Calves
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Restricted and Ad. libitum Feeding during Late Pregnancy on the Performance of Crossbred Cows and Their Calves
Khan, M.A.A.; Islam, M.N.; Khan, M.A.S.; Akbar, M.A.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The present research was undertaken to monitor the effects of restricted and ad. libitum feeding during last trimester of pregnancy on the performance of crossbred dairy cows and their calves. For this purpose two groups of crossbred cows having eight animals in each group were put into two plane of nutrition during their last three months of pregnancy. Dietary energy level in one group was calculated as per Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, (MAFF, UK) and the cows on other group received ad. libitum feeding (concentrate level similar to MAFF, recommendation+ad. libitum roughage). After calving, the cows of both groups were given same diet (ad. libitum) to study the effect of feeding during pregnancy on subsequent lactation performance of the cows. It was observed that during pre-calving period cows on ad. libitum feeding gained significantly (p<0.05) more body weight than that of cows on restricted feeding ( vs ). There was no significant differences between the birth weight of calves of restricted () and ad. libitum () groups. Dietary energy intake of ad. libitum group ( MJ ME/d/cow) was significantly higher (p<0.01) than that of restricted group ( MJ ME/d/cow). During lactation period cows that were on restricted feeding produced little more milk (3.06 lit/cow/day), than that of the cows on ad. libitum feeding (2.84 lit/cow/day). Although growth rate of the calves of restricted group upto one month () was significantly (p<0.01) higher than that of ad. libitum group () but after four months the growth rate of the calves of two groups become nearly similar ( vs ) and difference between them was non-significant. During lactation period cows of restricted group gained little weight but cows of ad. libitum group lost significantly (p<0.05) more weight. Per day metabolizable energy intake in both group during lactation period was nearly similar (67.54 vs 69.58 MJ ME). It is concluded that ad. libitum feeding during last trimester of pregnancy is neither economic for getting maximum milk yield nor for calf growth rate and MAFF, recommended level of dietary energy during that period could be applied on our pregnant crossbred dairy cows.
 Keywords
Crossbred Cows;Pregnancy;Pre-calving Nutrition and Lactation;Feed Intake;Reproduction;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Anderson, W. J., A. B. Pleasants and R. A. Barton. 1981. Effects of plane of nutrition on calf birth weight, calf growth rate and subsequent performances of Angus heifers calving in the spring. N.Z.J. Agric. Resh. 24:269-275.

2.
Anthony, R. V., R. A. Bellows, R. E. short, R. B. Staigmiller, C. C. Kaltenbach and T. G. Dunn. 1986. Fetal growth of beef calves. 1.Effect of pre-partum dietary crude protein on birth weight, blood metabolites and steroid hormone concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 1986. 62:1363-1374.

3.
Corah, L. R., T. G. Dunn and C. C. Kaltenbach. 1975. Influence of prepartum nutrition on the reproductive performance of beef females and the performance of their progeny. J. Amin. Sci. 41:819.

4.
Drennan, M. J. and I. H. Bath. 1976. Single suckled beef production, (3) effect of plane of nutrition during late pregnancy on cow performance. Ir. J. Agric. Resh. 15:157-168.

5.
Ducker, M. J. 1980. The effect of feeding strategy on the reproductive performance of dairy cows. In: Feeding Strategies for Dairy Cows (Ed. W. H. Broster, C. l. Johnson and J. C. Tayler). Agricultural Research Council, London. pp. 13-1-13.2.

6.
Ducker, M. J. and S. V. Morant. 1984. Observations on the relationships between the nutrition, Milk yield, live weight and reproductive performance of dairy cows. J. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. 38(1-3).

7.
Garnsworthy, P. C. and G. P. Jones. 1987. The influence of body condition at calving and dietary protein supplements on Voluntary food intake and performance in dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 66:347-353.

8.
Garnsworthy, P. C. and J. H. Topps. 1982. The effect of body condition of dairy cows at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets. J. Anim. Prod. 35: 113-119.

9.
Hight, G. K. 1966. The effects of under nutrition in late pregnancy on beef cattle production. N.Z.J. Agric Res. 9:479-490.

10.
Jordan, W. A., E. E. Lister and G. L. Rowland. 1967. Effects of planes of nutrition on wintering pregnant beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 48:145-154.

11.
Lodge, G. A. L. J. Fisher and J. R. Lessard. 1975. Influence of prepartum feed intake on performance of cow's fed ad. libitum during lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 58:696-702.

12.
McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards and J. F. D. Greenhalgh. 1985. Animal nutrition. Third edn. Longman Group Limited. Longman House. Burnt Mill. Harlow Essex, CM20 2 JE, England.

13.
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding system for ruminants. Tech. bull. 433. Her majestry's Stationery Office, London.

14.
Moe, P. W. and H. F. Tyrrell. 1972. Metabolisable energy requirements of pregnant dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 55:480.

15.
Russel, A. J. E., J. N. Peart, J. Eadie, A. J. MacDonald and I. R. White. 1979. The influence of energy intake during late pregnancy on the production from two genotypes of Suckler cow. J. Amin. Prod. 28:309-327.

16.
Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principle and procedure of statistic: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edn. Mc-Graw-Hill Book Company New York, New York.

17.
Treacher, R. J., J. M. Reid and C. J. Robert. 1986. Effect of body condition at calving on the health and performance of dairy cows. J. Anim. Prod. 43:1.