JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Evaluation of Diet for Buffalo Dairy Cows Using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Evaluation of Diet for Buffalo Dairy Cows Using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System
Calabro, S.; Piccolo, V.; Infascelli, F.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The aim of this paper was to use the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS), that reports diet energy and protein value and animal requirements, as net energy for lactation () and metabolizable protein (MP) respectively, to evaluate some rations for lactating Italian Mediterranean buffaloes. The investigation was carried out on six farms in the province of Caserta (southern Italy), where the milk production was controlled four times monthly on 10 animals (changing every time) chosen at different lactation days (5 categories): <2 months (A), 2-4 months (B), 4-6 months (C), 6-8 months (D), >8 months (E). Milk fat and protein were determined. Diet and MP were estimated with the CPM-Dairy program (1998) using diet component chemical characteristics; then energy and protein intakes were estimated. and MP requirements were estimated with two methods: 1) using CPM-Dairy that considers produced milk, fat and protein content, lactation phase and body condition score as main factors; 2) by applying the theory that to produce 1 kg of energy corrected milk, the buffalo needs 3.56 MJ of and the efficiency to convert the absorbed aminoacids into milk protein is lower than cow (CNCPS). As regards energy, with method 1 the requirements were satisfactory starting from category A (4 out of 6 farms) and category B (5/6 farms); however, a surplus resulted for category E (5/6 farms). With method 2 a deficit in category A (5/6 farms) and B (3/6 farms) was observed, while the energy requirements were satisfied for all categories except E, where on only one buffalo farm had a surplus of energy intake. As regards protein, with method 1 the requirements were substantially satisfied for all the categories except E (3/6 farms); with method 2 the MP trend was much less favourable than with method 1. Indeed, a protein deficit was observed for all animals in categories A and B (5/6 farms). Moreover, on one farm the protein intake never satisfied animal requirements. In our experimental conditions, the use of the CNCPS to characterise diets for lactating buffalo and to calculate their requirements led to satisfactory results. By contrast, we cannot say the same for method 2, which applies a lower use efficiency of NE and MP for lactation in buffalo compared to cow.
 Keywords
Italian Mediterranean Buffalo;The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System;Net Energy for Lactation;Metabolizable Protein;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Associazione Italiana Allevatori. 2001. Controlli della produttivita del latte in Italia. Statistiche ufficiali.

2.
ASPA 'Commissione Valutazione degli Alimenti'. 1980. Valutazione degli alimenti di interesse zootecnico. 1. Analisi chimica. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 6:19-34.

3.
Bertoni, G., T. Di Lella and S. Bartoocci. 1993. Nuove acquisizioni nel campo dell’alimentazione dei bufali. Atti 5$^{a}$ giornata di divulgazione 'Miglioramento dell’efficienza produttiva e riproduttiva della specie bufalina' Bella (PZ), 16 December.

4.
Bovera, F., M. I. Cutrignelli, S. Calabrò, V. Piccolo and T. Di Lella. 2000. Razionamento di bufale in lattazione mediante il Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System. Bubalus bubalis IV:67-77.

5.
Bovera, F., S. Calabro, M. I. Cutrignelli and T. Di Lella. 2002. Effect of dietary energy and protein contents, on buffalo milk yield and quality during advanced lactation period. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15(5):675-681.

6.
Campanile, G., C. De Filippo, R. Di Palo, W. Taccone and L. Zicarelli. 1998. Influence of dietary protein on urea levels in blood and milk of buffalo cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 55:135-143.

7.
Campanile, G., R. Di Palo and L. Zicarelli. 2001. Bilancio energetico e attivita riproduttiva nella specie bufalina. Proc. $1^{circ}$ Congresso Nazionale sull'Allevamento del Bufalo, Eboli, Salerno (Italy) 114-127.

8.
CPM-Dairy version 1.0 1998. The Center for Animal Health and Productivity, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennet Square PA; The Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca NY; and The William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute, Chazy NY.

9.
Di Lella, T. 1998. Advances in Buffalo Nutrition. Bubalus Bubalis, Suppl. N.1 207-215.

10.
Di Palo, R. 1992. Produzione lattea nella bufala con diete tradizionali e con impiego di acidi grassi. PhD thesis, Universita di Napoli.

11.
Di Palo, R. and F. Cheli. 1995. Supplementation of dairy buffalo diet with calcium salts of long chain fatty acids: effect on milk yield and composition. Bubalus bubalis II:43-56.

12.
Fox, D. G., C. J. Sniffen, J. D. O'Connor, J. B. Russel and J. B. Van Soest. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and diet adequacy. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3578-3596.

13.
Licitra, G., T. M. Hernandez and P. J. Van Soest. 1996. Standardization of preocedures for nitrogen fraction of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57:347-355.

14.
O'Connor, J. D., C. J. Sniffen, D. J. Fox and W. Chalupa. 1993. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: IV. Predicting amino acid adequacy. J. Anim. Sci. 71:1298-1311.

15.
Russel, J. B., J. D. O'Connor, D. G. Fox, J. B. Van Soest and C. J. Sniffen. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3551-3561.

16.
SAS Institute Inc. 2000. SAS/STAT User’s guide: Version 8.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

17.
Sniffen, C. J., J. D. O'Connor, P. J. Van Soest, D. G. Fox and J. B. Russel. 1992. A Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3562-3577.

18.
Stallings, C. C. and M. L. McGilliard. 1984. Lead factors for Total Mixed Ration Formulation. J. Dairy Sci. 67:902-907.

19.
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3595.

20.
Wagner, J. J., J. Lusby, J. W. Oltjen, J. Rakestraw, R. P. Wettermann and L. E. Walters. 1988. Carcass composition in mature Hereford cows: estimation and effect on daily metabolizable energy requirement during winter. J. Anim. Sci. 66:603-612.

21.
Zicarelli, L. 2001. Nutrition in dairy buffaloes. Bubalus bubalis, s.r.l. Salerno (Italy).