Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Utilization of Fruit Processing Wastes in the Diet of Labeo rohita Fingerling
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Utilization of Fruit Processing Wastes in the Diet of Labeo rohita Fingerling
Deka, Abani; Sahu, N.P.; Jain, K.K.;
  PDF(new window)
A feeding trial was conducted for 60 days to study the utilization of fruits processing wastes as feed ingredient in the diet of Labeo rohita fingerlings. One hundred and sixty fingerlings (av. body weight, ) were equally distributed in four experimental groups having 4 replicates each. Four different experimental diets were prepared by replacing wheat flour and rice bran with either orange (T2) (Cirtus qurantium), pineapple (T3) (Ananas spp. and Pseudananas spp.) or sweet lime (T4) (Citrus sinensis) wastes to the basal diet along with the control (T1, without any fruit wastes) keeping the CP level at around 40%. The water quality parameters like DO, , pH, total alkalinity, total hardness, ammonia and water temperature were recorded within the optimum range. The diet containing 25% pineapple wastes (T3) showed significantly higher growth in terms of SGR (1.50), FCR (2.09) and PER (1.19) than the other groups. However, growth of T4 and T2 groups were not significantly different than the control group (T1). Protease activity (17.17 unit/mg protein), protein digestibility (91.57%) and carbohydrate digestibility (41.62%) were not significantly different among the different groups. Survival of the fingerlings were not significantly different among the experimental groups. It concludes that waste of orange, pineapple and sweet lime can be used at 25% level as a substitute of wheat flour and rice bran in the diet of Labeo rohita.
Fruit Waste;Labeo rohita;Orange;Pineapple;Sweet Lime;
 Cited by
AOAC. 1980. Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists., 13th edition, AOAC. Washington. 1018.

APHA. 1985. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (revised edition), Pub. 67. American Water Work Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, 18th edition, Washington DC., USA., 4-80, 4-90.

Jafri, A. K. and M. F. Anwar. 1995. Protein digestibility of some low cost feed stuff in fingerling of Indian major carp. Asian Fish. Sci. 8:47-53.

Jhingran, V. G. 1982. Fish and fisheries of India (3rd Ed.) published by Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi. 273-338.

Maheswari, R. C., C. P. Bohra and P. K. Srivastava. 1984. Energy demand and biomass energy potential. Changing Villages 6 (5):337-341.

Murachi, T. and N. Takahashi. 1970. In: Structure-function Relationship of proteolytic enzymes (Ed. P. Densuella, H. Neurath and Ottenson) Munksagard, Copenhagen, Denmark: 298-309.

Patel, B. M., C. A. Patel and P. M. Talpada. 1972. Evaluation of mango seed kernels and tomato waste in the ration of bullocks. Indian J. Nutr. and Dietet. 9(6):347-350.

Peterson, G. L. 1977. A Simplification of protein assay of Lowry et al. which is generally more applicable. Analytical Biochem. 83:346-356.

Rick, W. 1974. Trypsin measurement with casein as substrate. In: Methods of enzymatic analysis (Ed. H. V. Bergmeyer), Verlag Chemie, Weinhein, Academic Press Inc., New York, London, 2nd ed., 2:1013-1024.

Rick, W. and H. P. Stegbauer. 1974. Alpha-amylase by measurement of reducing groups. Verlag Chemie, Weinhein, Academic Press Inc., New York, London, 885-889.

Snedecor, G. W. and G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Dehli. p. 593.