JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Different Source of Energy on Urea Molasses Mineral Block Intake, Nutrient Utilization, Rumen Fermentation Pattern and Blood Profile in Murrah Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Different Source of Energy on Urea Molasses Mineral Block Intake, Nutrient Utilization, Rumen Fermentation Pattern and Blood Profile in Murrah Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
Hosamani, S.V.; Mehra, U.R.; Dass, R.S.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In order to investigate the effect of different sources of energy on intake and nutrient utilization from urea molasses mineral block (UMMB), rumen fermentation pattern and blood biochemical constituents, 18 intact and 9 rumen fistulated male Murrah buffaloes aged about 3 years and average weight 310.8 kg were randomly allocated into three groups of 9 animals in each, thus each group having 6 intact and three rumen fistulated buffaloes. All animals were fed individually for 90 days. All buffaloes were offered wheat straw as basal roughage and urea molasses mineral block for free choice of licking. Three different energy sources viz., barley grain, (group I), maize grain (group II) and jowar green (group III) were offered to meet their nutrient requirement as per Kearl (1982). At the end of feeding trial, a metabolism trial of 7 days duration was carried out on intact animals to determine the digestibility of nutrients. Rumen fermentation studies were carried out on rumen fistulated animals. After the metabolism trial blood was collected from intact animals to estimate the nitrogen constituents in blood serum of animals fed on different sources of energy. Results revealed no significant difference in the intake of UMMB in three groups. Similarly, the intake of DM (kg), DCP (g) and TDN (kg) per day was similar in three groups statistically. The apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), ether extract (EE) and nitrogen free extract (NFE) was significantly (p<0.05) more in group II than group III, whereas the digestibility of DM, OM and NFE was similar in group I and II. The digestibility of crude fiber (CF) and all the fiber fractions i.e. NDF, ADF, cellulose and hemicellulose was alike in 3 groups. Nitrogen balance (g/d) was significantly (p<0.05) more in group III as compared to group I and II, which were alike statistically, though the N intake (g/d) was similar in 3 groups but N balance (g/d) was significantly (p<0.05) less in group III as compared to other 2 groups. Significantly (p<0.05) higher concentration of total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), total nitrogen (TN) and its fractions were observed in group I and II as compared to group III. There was no effect on rumen pH, rumen volume and digesta flow rate due to different sources of energy in 3 groups. Similarly the blood serum biochemical parameters (NH3-N, urea-N and total protein) were statistically identical in 3 groups.
 Keywords
Urea Molasses Mineral Block;Nutrient Utilization;Rumen Fermentation Pattern;Blood Profile;Murrah Buffaloes;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Ali, A. and I. H. Mirza. 1986. Feeding of urea molasses block 'buffaloes chocolate' to ruminants in the tropics. Asian Livestock, December, pp.160-164

2.
Annino, J. S. 1976. Determination of total proteins and albumins in serum. Clinic chem. Principles and Procedures, 4th edn., Little Brown and Company, Boston, pp.184-188

3.
AOAC. 1985. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Official Methods of Analysis, 13th edn. Washington. D.C.

4.
Barnett, A. J. G. and R. L. Reid. 1957. Studies on the production of volatile fatty acids from the grass by rumen liquor in an artificial rumen I. Volatile fatty acid production from grass. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 48:315-321 crossref(new window)

5.
Bhatia, S. K., K. Pradhan and R. Singh. 1980. Rumen metabolic profile as influenced by dietary non-protein nitrogen and soluble carbohydrates. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 50:16-20

6.
Conway, E. S. 1957. Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error. Crossby Lockwood and Sons Ltd., University Press, Glasgow and London. pp.98-100

7.
Garg, M. R. and B. N. Gupta. 1992. Effect of supplementing urea molasses mineral block lick to straw based diet in DM intake and nutrient utilization . Asian-Aust J. Anim Sci. 5 (5):39-44

8.
Hande, P. S. 1989. Studies on the supplementation of cotton seed cake as an additive on a diet of urea-molasses mineral block and wheat straw in buffaloes. M.V.Sc. Thesis, Deemed University, IVRI, Izatnagar, India

9.
Hosamani, S. V., U. R. Mehra and R. S. Dass. 1995. Effect of dietary urea levels on intake of urea molasses mineral block (UMMB) and utilization of nutrients in adult buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 12:67-72

10.
Hosamani, S. V., U. R. Mehra and R. S. Dass. 1998. Effect of different planes of nutrition on urea molasses mineral block intake, nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation pattern and blood profile in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 76:117-128 crossref(new window)

11.
Jayasuriya, M. C. N. 1987. Improvement of Poor quality roughages. In: Advanced Animal Nutrition for Developing countries ( Ed.U.B. Singh) Indo-vision Pvt. Ltd., Ghaziabad. pp.236-259

12.
Kearl, L. C. 1982. Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants in Developing Countries. International Feed Stuffs Institute, Utah State University, Logan, UT, p.82

13.
Kumar, N., U. R. Mehra, U. B. Singh and D. N. Verma. 1984. Effect of ammoniation of sugarcane bagasse and molasses supplementation on nutrient utilization in crossbred cattle. J. Vet. Physiol & Allied Sci. 3: 55-62

14.
Leng, R. A. 1984. The potential of solidified molasses based blocks for the correction of multi nutritional deficiencies in buffaloes and other ruminants fed low quality agro-industrial by products.In Use of Nuclear Techniques to Improve Domestic Buffalo Production in Asia. IAEA, Vienna. pp.135-150

15.
Leng, R. A. and T. R. Preston. 1983. Nutritional Strategies for the utilization of agro-industrial by products by ruminants and extension of the principles and technologies to the small farmers in Asia. Proc. 50th world conf. on Animal Production, Vol. 4, pp. 310-318

16.
Mangat Ram and P. J. G. Kunju. 1986. Effect of incorporating concentrate mixture with urea molasses mineral block feeding on rumen metabolites and digesta flow rate in buffalo calves. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 3:244-248

17.
McLaren, G. S., G. C. Anderson, L. I. Tsai and K. M. Barth. 1965. Level of readily fermentable carbohydrates and adaptation of lambs to all urea supplemented rations. J. Nutr. 87: 331-336

18.
Mehra, U. R., J. Challa and U. B. Singh. 1991. Effect of supplementation of urea molasses mineral block and wheat bran in a wheat bhoosa based diet on growth performance and nutrient utilization in buffalo calves. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 44(8): 522-525

19.
Mehra, U. R., J. Challa and U. B. Singh. 1993. Nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation pattern in buffaloes fed rations supplemented with formaldehyde treated urea molasses mineral block. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 4:67-72

20.
Neric, S. P., D. L. Aquino, P. C. Delacuz and S. K. Ranjhan. 1985. Effect of urea molasses mineral block lick on the performance of caracows (swamp buffaloes). Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 2:89-96

21.
Pate, F. M., P. M. Fairhurst and J. T. K. Munthali. 1985. Urea levels and supplemental energy sources in sugarcane diets, J. Anim. Sci. 61:252-259

22.
Pathak, N. N., S. K. Ranjhan and S. J. Daniel. 1984. Nutrient utilization and growth response of male buffalo calves fed adlibitum urea molasses liquid feed with restricted oat forage and ground nut cake. J. Vety. Physiol. Allied Sci. 3 (1):31-35

23.
Rahmatullah, M. and T. R. C. Boyde. 1980. Improvements in the determination of urea using diacetyl monoxime method with and without proteinization. Clin. Chem. Acta. 107:3-9 crossref(new window)

24.
Singh, U. B. and U. R. Mehra. 1980. A preliminary note on the possibility of using cement and wheat flour as binding agents for preparing urea molasses block lick at ambient temperature. J. Vety. Physiol & Allied Sci. 5:43-44

25.
Singh, U. B. and U. R. Mehra. 1990. Utilization of ammoniated wheat straw given in a feed block and supplemented with varying quantities of fish meal and oil extracted rice bran. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 28: 129-134 crossref(new window)

26.
Smith, R. H. and A. B. McAllan. 1970. Nucleic acid metabolism in the ruminant. Br. J. Nutr. 24:545-556 crossref(new window)

27.
Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cocharan. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th edn., Oxford and IBH publication, Calcutta, India, pp 258-259

28.
Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

29.
Sudana, I. B. and R. A. Leng. 1988. Effect of supplementing wheat straw diet with urea or urea molasses block and/or cotton seed meal on intake and live weight changes of lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 16:25-35

30.
Thu, N. V. and P. Uden. 2000. Effect of urea molasses cake supplementation on live weight and milk yield of Murrah buffalo cows. Asian-Aust J. Anim. Sci. 13(9):1329-36

31.
Thu, N. V. and P. Uden. 2001. Effect of work and urea molasses cake supplementation of swamp buffaloes fed rice straw or grasses on rumen environment, feed degradation and intake. Asian-Aust J. Anim Sci. 14(5):631-639

32.
Tiwari, S. P. 1988. Studies on solidified urea molasses based block lick in buffalo calves fed low quality crop residues. Ph. D. thesis I.V.R.I., Deemed University, Izatnagar. India

33.
Toppo, S., A. K. Verma, R. S. Dass and U. R. Mehra. 1997. Nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation pattern in crossbred cattle fed on different planes of nutrition supplemented with urea molasses mineral block. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 64: 101-112 crossref(new window)

34.
Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Cormell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.

35.
Van Soest, P. J., J. B.Robertson and B. S.Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysacharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.