Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Variety on Proportion of Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value of Different Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Relationship between Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Variety on Proportion of Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value of Different Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Relationship between Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value
Islam, M.R.; Saha, C.K.; Sarker, N.R.; Jalil, M.A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.;
  PDF(new window)
Five varieties of napiergrasses (Pennisetum purpureum) were fractionated botanically into leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem and head. Chemical composition of each of whole napiergrass and their botanical fractions were determined. Correlation, linear and multiple regressions between botanical fractions and nutritive value of varieties of napiergrass were also estimated. All botanical fractions differed due to the effect of variety. Napier Pusha contained the highest proportion of leaf blade and internode, but the lowest proportion of leaf sheath. Napier Hybrid contained the lowest proportion of leaf blade, but highest proportion of node. Consequently, napier Pusha contained the highest (p<0.01) crude protein (CP, 9.0%), but Napier Hybrid had the lowest CP (7.0%). Chemical composition of whole plant differed significantly (p<0.01; except NFE, p>0.05) due to the variety. Not only the whole plant, chemical composition of most botanical fractions of whole plant differed (p<0.05 to 0.01) due to the variety. The intrarelationships between leaf blade and leaf sheath was negative (r=-0.43). Leaf sheath was also negatively correlated to CP, but positively correlated to ash of whole Napier or their botanical fractions. Leaf blade, on the other hand, increases CP but decreases ash content of whole plant or their fractions. These results, therefore, suggest that napiergrass varieties differ widely in terms of botanical fractions and nutritive value, which may have important implications on intake and productivity of animals. Furthermore, napiergrass varieties should be selected for leaf blade only for a better response.
Napier;Variety;Botanical Fractions;Leaf Blade;Selection;
 Cited by
Estimating Nutritive Values ofJasminum fruticans L. Plant Species in Northern Rangelands of Golestan Province, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2017, 0  crossref(new windwow)
Minerals profile of forages for grazing ruminants in Pakistan, Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 2012, 02, 03, 133  crossref(new windwow)
Nutritive value of selected grasses in North Sumatra, Indonesia, Animal Science Journal, 2005, 76, 5, 461  crossref(new windwow)
Whole crop rice silage: Predictions of yield and content of metabolizable energy, metabolizable protein and other nutrients for dairy cows from crop maturity and botanical fractions at harvest, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011, 163, 2-4, 222  crossref(new windwow)
Aman, P. and E. Nordkvist. 1983. Chemical composition and in vitro degradability of botanical fractions of cereal straw. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 13:61-67

AOAC. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D. C.

Herbert, F. and E. F. Thomson. 1992. Chemical composition, intake, apparent digestibility and nylon-bag disappearance of leaf and stem fractions from straw of four barley genotypes. Anim. Prod. 55: 407-412

Islam, M. R., E. Owen, D. I. Givens and A. R. Moss. 1996. Effects of variety, sowing date and fertilizer nitrogen on botanical fractions of oat straw. Anim. Sci. 62:687

Islam, M. R., E. Owen, D. I. Givens and A. R. Moss. 1997a. Effects of variety, fertilizer nitrogen and sowing date on in vitro digestibility and botanical fractions of oat straw. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. p.74

Islam, M. R., E. Owen, D. I. Givens and A. R. Moss. 1997b. Effect of amount offered on total intake of oat straw and straw botanical fractions by sheep. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. p.75

Kibria, S. S., M. R. Islam and M. M. Rahman. 1993. Feasibility study on the production of different fodder crops in Bangladesh. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 25-33

Laredo, M. A. and D. J. Minson. 1973. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time by sheep of leaf and stem fractions of five grasses. Austra. J. Agric. Res. 24: 875-888 crossref(new window)

Nakashima, Y. and E. R. Orskov. 1990. Rumen degradation of straw. 9. Effect of cellulase and ammonia treatment on different varieties of rice straws and their botanical fractions. Anim. Prod. 50: 309-317

Orskov, E. R. 1988. Consistency of differences in nutritive value of straw from different varieties in different seasons. In: Plant Breeding and the Nutritive Value of Crop Residues, J. D. Reed, B. S. Capper and P. J. H. Neate (Ed.). International Livestock Center for Africa, pp. 163-173. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Poppi, D. P., D. J. Minson and J. H. Ternouth. 1981. Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. I. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time in the reticulo-rumen. Austra. J. Agric. Res. 32: 99-108 crossref(new window)

Ramanzin, M., L. Bailoni and G. Beni. 1991. Varietal differences in rumen degradation of barley, wheat and hard wheat straws. Anim. Prod. 53:143-150

Ramanzin, M., E. R. Orskov and A. K. Tuah. 1986. Rumen degradation of straw. 2. Botanical fractions of straw from two barley cultivars. Anim. Prod. 43: 271-278

SAS. 1988. Statistical Analysis System, Version 6.08, SAS Institute, SAS Inc, Cary, USA.

Shand, W. J., E. R. Orskov and L. A. Morrice. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 5. Botanical fractions and degradability of different varieties of oat and wheat straws. Anim. Prod. 47:387-392.

Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biomedical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.

Thiago, L. R. L. and R. C. Kellaway. 1982. Botanical composition and extent of lignification affecting digestibility of wheat and oat straw and paspalum hay. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 7:71-81. crossref(new window)

Wahed, R. A., E. Owen, M. Naate and B. J. Hosking. 1990. Feeding straw to small ruminants: effect of amount offered on intake and selection of barley straw by goats and sheep. Anim. Prod. 47: 105-110.

Wales, W. J., P. T. Doyle, G. R. Pearce. 1990. The feeding value of cereal straws for sheep. I. Wheat straws. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 29, 1-14. crossref(new window)

Walli, T. K., E. R. Orskov and P. K. Bhargava. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 3. Botanical fractions of two rice straw varieties and effects of ammonia treatment. Anim. Prod. 46:347-352.