JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Apparent Ileal Digestibility of Nutrient in Plant Protein Feedstuffs for Finishing Pigs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Apparent Ileal Digestibility of Nutrient in Plant Protein Feedstuffs for Finishing Pigs
Han, Y.K.; Kim, I.H.; Hong, J.W.; Kwon, O.S.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Min, B.J.; Lee, W.B.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Five barrows (average initial body weight 58.6 kg) were used to determine the apparent ileal digestibilities of amino acids, DM, N and energy in various soybean meal, rapeseed meal and coconut meal in finishing pigs. Dietary treatments included 1) KSBM (Korean soybean meal), 2) CSBM (Chinese soybean meal), 3) ASBM (Argentine soybean meal), 4) RSM (Rapeseed meal), and 5) CNM (Coconut meal). The diets were corn starch-based and formulated so that each protein source provided the same amount of total ME (3,490 kcal/kg), CP (15.70%), lysine (1.00%), Ca (0.80%) and P (0.60%). Protein content of the KSBM was higher than the CSBM and ASBM, with all values similar to those expected, and protein content of the CNM was lower than that of the SBM preparation and RSM. Apparent ileal digestibilities of histidine, lysine, threonine, alanine, asparatic acid, cystine, glutamic acid and serine were greater for the KSBM, CSBM, ASBM and RSM than for the CNM (p<0.05). Also, the apparent ileal digestibilities of methionine, leucine, phenylalanine, valine and tyrosine were greater for the KSBM than for the CSBM, ASBM, RSM and CNM (p<0.05). Overall, the apparent ileal digestibilities of total essential amino acids were greater for the KSBM than for the CSBM, ASBM, RSM and CNM (p<0.05), and the apparent ileal digestibilities of total non essential amino acids were greater for the KSBM, CSBM, ASBM and RSM than for the CNM (p<0.05). No difference (p>0.05) in apparent digestibility of DM at the small intestine was observed among the treatments. However, the apparent digestibility of DM at the total tract was greater for the KSBM than for the CSBM, ASBM, RSM and CNM (p<0.05). Also, apparent digestibilities of N and digestible energy at the small intestine and total tract were greater for the KSBM than for the RSM and CNM (p<0.05). In conclusion, nutrient digestibility values of SBM preparations and RSM were relatively high compared to CNM.
 Keywords
Soybean Meal;Rapeseed Meal;Coconut Meal;Ileal Digestibility;Pigs;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
AOAC. 1995. Official method of analysis. 16th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

2.
Armstrong, D. G. and H. H. Mitchell. 1955. Protein nutrition and the utilization of dietary protein at different levels of intake by growing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 14:49.

3.
Buraczewska, L., J. Wasilewko, H. Fandrejewski, T. Zebrowska and I. K. Han. 1999. Formulation of pig diets according to ileal digestible amino acid content. Livest. Prod. Sci. 59:13-24. crossref(new window)

4.
Cullison A. E. and R. S. Lowrey. 1987. High protein feeds: A Feeds and Feeding. 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc. USA.

5.
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 11:1. crossref(new window)

6.
Fan, M. Z., W. C. Sauer and C. F. M. de Lange. 1995. Amino acid digestibility in soybean meal, extruded soybean and full-fat canola for early-weaned pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 52:189-203. crossref(new window)

7.
Fan, M. Z., W. C. Sauer and V. M. Gabert. 1996. Variability of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in canola meal for growing-finishing pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 76:563-569.

8.
Flipot, P., R. J. Belzile and G. J. Brisson. 1971. Utilizability of the amino acids in casein, fish meal, soy protein and zein as measured in the chick. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51:801.

9.
Grala, W., L. Buraczewska, J. Gdala and B. Pastuszewska. 1994. Effect of the thermal processing on the protein value of double-low rapeseed products. 1. Effect of toasting temperature on protein value of rapeseed oil meal for pigs. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 3:33-42.

10.
Herkelman, K. L., G. L. Cromwell, T. S. Stahly, T. W. Pfeiffer and D. A. Knabe. 1992. Apparent digestibility of amino acids in raw and heated conventional and low trypsin-inhibitor soybeans for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 818-826.

11.
Im, H. J., J. H. Kong, S. T. Ahn, K. T. Nam and C. W. Kang. 1995. Effects of rapeseed oil meal quality on the performance of weanling pigs. Kor. J. Anim. Sci. 37:363-370.

12.
Just, A., H. Jorgensen and J. A. Fernandez. 1985. Correlations of protein deposited in growing female pigs to ileal and fecal digestible crude protein and amino acids. Livest. Prod. Sci. 12: 145-159. crossref(new window)

13.
Kim, I. H., J. D. Hancock, D. B. Jones and P. G. Reddy. 1999. Extrusion processing of low-inhibitor soybeans improves growth performance of early-weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 12:1251-1257.

14.
Kim, I. H., J. D. Hancock and R. H. Hines. 2000. Influence of processing methods on ileal digestibility of nutrients from soybeans in growing and finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:192-199.

15.
Ko, Y. D., J. H. Kim, S. O. Yoo, Y. M. Song and S. J. Park. 1999. Amino acid availabilities in growing pigs fed various soybean meal sources. Kor. J. Anim. Nutr. Feed. 23:427-436.

16.
Li, S. and W. C. Sauer. 1994. The effect of dietary fat content on amino acid digestibility in young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1737-1743.

17.
Li, D. F., S. Y. Qiao, G. F. Yi, J. Y. Jiang, X. X. Xu, P. A. Thacker, X. S. Piao and I. K. Han. 2000. Nutritional evaluation of Chinese nonconventional protein feedstuffs for growingfinishing pigs: 2. Rapeseed meal. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 13:46-52.

18.
Low, A. G. 1980. Nutrient absorption in pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 31:1087-1130. crossref(new window)

19.
National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th Edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

20.
Noblet, J. and J. M. Perez. 1993. Prediction of digestibility of nutrient and energy values of pig diets from chemical. J. Anim. Sci. 71:3389-3398.

21.
SAS. 1996. SAS user's guide. Release 6.12 edition. SAS Inst Inc Cary NC. USA.

22.
Sauer, W. C., R. Cichon and R. Misir. 1982. Amino acid availability and protein quality of canola and rapeseed meal for pigs and rats. J. Anim. Sci. 54: 292-301.

23.
Thacker, P. A. 1990. Canola meal. In Nontraditional Feed for Use in Sources Swine Production. (Ed. P. A. Thacker and R. N. Kirkwood). Butterworth Publishers, USA.

24.
Thorne, P. J., J, Wiseman, D. J. A. Cole, D. H. Machin. 1992. Effects of level of inclusion of copra meal in balanced diets supplemented with synthetic amino acids on growth and fat deposition and composition in growing pigs fed ad libtum at a constant temperature. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 40:31-40. crossref(new window)

25.
Thorne, P. J., D. J. A. Cole and J. Wiseman. 1990. Copra meal. In Nontraditional Feed for Use in Sources Swine Production. (Ed. P. A. Thacker and R. N. Kirkwood). Butterworth Publishers, USA.

26.
Woodworth, J. C., M. D. Tokach, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, P. R. O'Quinn, D. A. Knabe and N. W. Said. 2001. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids and digestible and metabolizable energy content of dry extruded-expelled soybean meal and its effects on growth performance of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1280-1287.