JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Supplementary Feeding of Concentrate on Nutrient Utilization and Production Performance of Ewes Grazing on Community Rangeland during Late Gestation and Early Lactation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Supplementary Feeding of Concentrate on Nutrient Utilization and Production Performance of Ewes Grazing on Community Rangeland during Late Gestation and Early Lactation
Chaturvedi, O.H.; Bhatta, Raghavendra; Santra, A.; Mishra, A.S.; Mann, J.S.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Malpura and Kheri ewes (76) in their late gestation, weighing were randomly selected and divided into 4 groups of 19 each (G1, G2, G3 and G4). Ewes in all the groups were grazed on natural rangeland from 07.00 h to 18.00 h. Ewes in G1were maintained on sole grazing while ewes in G2, G3 and G4, in addition to grazing received concentrate mixture at the rate of 1% of their body weight during late gestation, early lactation and entire last quarter of pregnancy to early quarter of lactation, respectively. The herbage yield of the community rangeland was 0.82 metric ton dry matter/hectare. The diet consisted of (%) Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) bhusa, (59.2), Babool pods and leaves (17.2), Bajra (Pennisetum typhoides) stubbles (8.8), Doob (5.3), Aak (4.2) and others (5.3). The nutrient intake and its digestibility were higher (p<0.01) in G2, G3 and G4 as compared to G1 because of concentrate supplementation. The intakes of DM (), DCP () and ME () were 56.7, 5.3 and 0.83; 82.7, 12.2 and 1.16; 82.7, 12.1 and 1.17 and 83.1, 12.3 and 1.18 in G1, G2, G3 and G4, respectively. The per cent digestibility of DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF and cellulose was 57.9, 68.8, 68.7, 52.3, 37.5 and 68.4; 67.6, 76.1, 82.3, 60.6, 44.5 and 73.4; 67.6, 76.1, 81.5, 60.6, 44.8 and 74.5 and 67.6, 76.1, 82.3, 60.6, 44.7 and 73.3 in G1, G2, G3 and G4, respectively. The nutrient intake of G2, G3 and G4 ewes was sufficient to meet their requirements. The ewes raised on sole grazing lost weight at lambing in comparison to advanced pregnancy. However, ewes raised on supplementary feeding gained 1.9-2.5 kg at lambing. The birth weight of lambs in G2 (3.92) and G4 (4.07) was higher (p<0.01) than G1 (2.98), where as in G1 and G3 it was similar. The weight of lambs at 15, 45 and 60 days of age were higher in G2, G3 and G4 than in G1. Similarly, the average daily gain (ADG) after 60 days was also higher in G2, G3 and G4 than in G1. The milk-yield of lactating ewes in G2, G3 and G4 increased up to 150-250 g per day in comparison to G1. The birth weight, weight at 15, 30, 45 and 60 days, weight gain and ADG at 30 or 60 days was similar both in male and female lambs. It is concluded from this study that the biomass yield of the community rangeland is low and insufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of ewes during late gestation and early lactation. Therefore, it is recommended concentrate supplementation at the rate of 1% of body weight to ewes during these critical stages to enhance their production performance, general condition as well as birth weight and growth rate of lambs.
 Keywords
Supplementary Feeding;Nutrient Utilization;Production Performance;Ewes;Community Rangeland;Gestation;Lactation;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Influence of Restricted Grazing Time Systems on Productive Performance and Fatty Acid Composition of Longissimus dorsi in Growing Lambs,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2015. vol.28. 8, pp.1105-1115 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.

2.
ARC. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Agricultural Research Council Supplement 1, pp.78-80. Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.

3.
Bhatta, Raghavendra, A. K. Shinde, S. K. Sankhyan and D. L. Verma. 2002. Nutrition of range goats in a shrubland of Western India. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15(12):1719-1724.

4.
Chaturvedi, O. H, A. S. Mishra, S. A. Karim and R. C. Jakhmola. 2000. Effect of supplementary feeding on growth performance of lambs under field condition. Indian J. Small Ruminants. 6:110-112.

5.
Chaturvedi, O. H., A. S. Mishra, A. Santra, S. A. Karim and R. C. Jakhmola. 2001. Effect of supplementary feeding during late gestation on production performance of ewes grazing on community rangeland. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 71:714-717.

6.
Chaturvedi, O. H., M. K. Tripathi, A. S. Mishra, D. L. Verma, P. S. Rawat and R. C. Jakhmola. 2002. Land as well as livestock holding pattern and feeding practices of livestock in Malpura taluk of semiarid eastern Rajasthan. Indian J. Small Ruminants. 8:143-146.

7.
ICAR. 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Livestock and Poultry. Publication and Information Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

8.
McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards and J. F. D. Greenhalgh. 1988. Animal Nutrition. 5th Edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, Group UK Limited, Longman House, Burnt Mill, Harlow, Essex CM20 2JE, England.

9.
Osbourn, D. F., S. B. Cammell, R. A. Terry and G. E. Outen. 1970. The effect of chemical composition and physical characteristics of forages on their voluntary intake by sheep (Abstract). In GRI Report. p. 67.

10.
Papanastasis, P. V. 1977. Optimum size and shape of quadrate for sampling herbage weight in grassland of Northern Greece. J. Range Management. 30:446-448. crossref(new window)

11.
Ramirez, R.G., D. S. Alonso, G. Hernandez and B. Ramirez. 1995. Nutrient intake of range sheep on a bufflegrass (Cenchrus ciliaris) pasture. Small Ruminant Research. 17:123-128. crossref(new window)

12.
Sankhyan, S. K., A. K. Shinde, R. Bhatta and S. A. Karim. 1999b. Comparison of diet and faecal collection methods for assessment of seasonal variation in dry matter intake by sheep maintained on a Cenchrus ciliaris pasture. Anim. Feed Sci. & Tech. 82: 261-269. crossref(new window)

13.
Sankhyan, S. K., A. K. Shinde and S. A. Karim. 1999a. Seasonal changes in biomass yield, nutrient intake and its utilization by sheep maintained on public rangeland. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69:617-620.

14.
Santra, A. and N. N. Pathak. 1999. Nutrient utilization and compensatory growth in crossbred (Bos indicus${\times}$Bos taurus) calves. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 12:1285-1291.

15.
Shinde, A. K., B. C. Patnayak, S. A. Karim and J. S. Mann. 1994. Plane of nutrition and economics of ram raising under different system of grazing management. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 11:85-89.

16.
Shinde, A. K., S. A. Karim, J. S. Mann and B. C. Patnayak. 1996. Performance of sheep under different silvipastoral systems. Indian J. Animal Production and Management. 12:30-33.

17.
Shinde, A. K., S. A. Karim, S. K. Sankhyan and R. Bhatta. 1998. Seasonal changes in biomass growth and quality and its utilization by sheep on semiarid Cenchrus ciliaris pasture of India. Small Ruminant Research. 30:29-35. crossref(new window)

18.
Tilley, J. M. A. and R. A. Terry. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crop. J. British grassland Society. 18:104-111. crossref(new window)

19.
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597