Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Effect of Harvesting Interval on Herbage Yield and Nutritive Value of Napier Grass and Hybrid Pennisetums
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Effect of Harvesting Interval on Herbage Yield and Nutritive Value of Napier Grass and Hybrid Pennisetums
Manyawu, G.J.; Chakoma, C.; Sibanda, S.; Mutisi, C.; Chakoma, I.C.;
  PDF(new window)
A 6 (accession)5 (cutting interval) factorial experiment was conducted over two years to investigate the effect of stage of growth on herbage production, nutritive value and water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content of Napier grass and Napier grassPearl millet hybrids (hybrid Pennisetum). The purpose of the experiment was to determine the optimum stage of growth to harvest the Pennisetums for ensilage. Two Napier accessions (SDPP 8 and SDPP 19) and four hybrid Pennisetum (SDPN 3, SDPN 29, SDPN 38 and Bana grass) were compared at five harvest intervals (viz. 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 weeks). Basal fertilizers were similar in all treatment plots, although nitrogen (N) top-dressing fertilizer was varied proportionately, depending on the harvesting interval. The application was based on a standard rate of 60 kg N/ha every six weeks. Stage of growth had significant effects on forage yield, WSC content and nutritive value of the Pennisetums. Herbage yields increased in a progressively linear manner, with age. Nutritive value declined as the harvesting interval increased. In particular, crude protein content declined rapidly (p<0.001) from DM at 2 weeks to DM at 8 weeks of growth. In vitro dry matter digestibility decreased from 728 to DM, whilst acid and neutral detergent fibre contents increased from 360 and 704 to 398 and DM, respectively. Rapid changes in nutritive value occurred after 6 weeks of growth. The concentration of WSC increased in a quadratic manner, with peaks ( DM) at about 6 weeks. However, the DM content of the forage was low () at 6 weeks. Therefore, it was concluded that Pennisetums should be harvested between 6 and 7 weeks, to increase DM content and optimize herbage production without seriously affecting nutritive value and WSC content. Accessions SDPN 29 and SDPP 19 appeared to be most suited for ensilage. It was suggested that WSC content should be incorporated as a criterion in the agronomic evaluation and screening of Pennisetum varieties.
Napier Grass;Pennisetum Purpureum;Pennisetum PurpureumP. Americanum;Silage;Cutting Frequency;Water Soluble Carbohydrates;
 Cited by
Management of Perennial Warm-Season Bioenergy Grasses. I. Biomass Harvested, Nutrient Removal, and Persistence Responses of Elephantgrass and Energycane to Harvest Frequency and Timing, BioEnergy Research, 2015, 8, 2, 581  crossref(new windwow)
Seasonal changes in chemical composition and leaf proportion of elephantgrass and energycane biomass, Industrial Crops and Products, 2016, 94, 107  crossref(new windwow)
Allen, S. E. 1989. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. 2nd Edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, United Kingdom. pp. 164-175.

Butt, M. N., G. B. Donart, M. G. Southward, R. D. Pieper and N. Mohammad. 1993. Effect of defoliation on plant growth of Napier grass. Trop. Sci. 33:111-120.

Catchpoole, V. R. and E. F. Henzell. 1971. Silage and silage-making from tropical herbage species. Herb. Abstr. 41:213-221.

Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. (2nd edition). John Wiley and Sons Inc., Canada. p 680.

Gomide, J. A., C. H. Noller, G. O. Mott, J. H. Conrad and D. L. Hill. 1969. Effect of plant age and nitrogen fertilization on the chemical composition and in vitro cellulose digestibility of tropical grasses. Agron. Journ. 61:116-120.

Harrison, J. H., R. L. Kincaid, K. A. Loney, R. E. Riley and J. Cronrath. 1994. Fermentation and nutritive value of Zea mays and lucerne forage ensiled with added rolled barley. Grass and Forage Sci. 49:130-137 crossref(new window)

Johnson, W. L., J. Guerrero and D. Pezo. 1973. Cell wall constituents and in vitro digestibility of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum). J. Anim. Sci. 37:1255-1261.

Jones, D. I. H., R. Jones and G. Morseley. 1990. Effect of incorporating rolled barley in autumn-cut ryegrass on effluent production, silage fermentation and cattle performance. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 115:399-408. crossref(new window)

Manyawu, G. J., S. Sibanda, I. Chakoma and B. Dzowela. 1998. Screening Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and interspecific hybrids between Napier grass and Pearl millet (P. americanum) for fodder production in different agro-ecological environments of Zimbabwe. Project Review on Intergrated Livestock/crop production systems in the smallholder farming systems in Zimbabwe. Proceedings of a Workshop held at the University of Zimbabwe, Dept. of Animal Science, Zimbabwe, on 13-26 January 1998. pp 81-109䡇Ⰰ਀首䡇 ソ首䡇㈀଀骖䡇㌀Ѐ˜䡇㤀฀肘䡇㼀﷿￿リ䡇䔀؀肙䡇䘀￿ル䡇䜀￿羚䡇䠀؀›䡇䤀￿羛䡇䨀܀肜䡇䬀￿￿䡇爀Ȁ€餖䥇猀ऀ䥇琀￿缘䥇甀Ā䥇瘀刺￿9䥇眀ఀ䥇砀刺￿ソ䥇騀￿首䥇鬀଀骗䥇鰀￿羛䥇鴀￿￿䥇뤀ﳿ羙ᰘ䩇먀Ѐ耛䩇묀Ȁ€䩇츀﷿リᢙ䩇케ﳿ羘馚䩇퀀ࠀ䭇Ȁ˜頚䭇ﯿ;鬜䭇

Mugerwa, J. S. and B. H. Ogwang. 1976. Dry matter production and chemical composition of Elephant grass hybrids. East Afri. Agric. and Forestry Journ. 42:60-65.

Muldoon, D. K. and C. J. Pearson. 1979. The Hybrid between Pennisetum americanum and P. purpureum -A review. Herb. Abstr 49 (Suppl. 5):189-199 (Abstr.).

Mwakha, E. 1972. Effect of cutting frequency on the productivity of Napier and Guatemala grasses in Western Kenya. East Afric. Agric. and Forestry Journ. 37:206-210.

Odhiambo, J. F. 1974. The nutritive value of various growth stages of Pennisetum purpureum. East Afric. Agric. and Forestry Journ. 39:325-329.

SAS. 1996. Statistical package of the Statistical Analytical Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Spitaleri, R. E., L. E. Sollenberger, C. R. Staples and S. C. Schank. 1995. Harvest management effects on silage nutritive value of seeded Pennisetum hexaploid hybrids. Postharv. Bio. and Technol. 5: 353-362. crossref(new window)

Tilley, J. M. A. and R. A. Terry. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Brit. Gras. Soc. 33:13-18.

Tosi, H., V. P. D., Faria, L. E., Guitierrez and A. C. Silveira. 1983. Evaluation of Elephantgrass Taiwan A-148 cultivar for ensilage. (in Portuguese) Pesqui. Agropecu. Bra. 18: 295-299.

Vicente-Chandler, J., S. Selva and J. Figarella, 1959. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and frequency of cutting. Agron. Journ. 51: 202.

Wilkinson, J. M. 1983. Silages made from Tropical and Temperate crops. Part 1;The ensiling process and its influence on feed value. World Ani. Rev. 45:36-41.

Woodard, K. R. and G. M. Prine. 1991. Forage yield and nutritive value of Elephantgrass as affected by harvest frequency and genotype. Agron. Journ. 83 (3):541-546.

Woodard, K. R., G. M. Prine and D. T. Bates. 1991. Silages characteristics of Elephant grass as affected by harvesting frequency and genotype. Agron. Journ 83:547-551.